Cargando…
Directional and inter‐acquisition variability in diffusion‐weighted imaging and editing for restricted diffusion
PURPOSE: To evaluate and quantify inter‐directional and inter‐acquisition variation in diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) and emphasize signals that report restricted diffusion to enhance cancer conspicuity, while reducing the effects of local microscopic motion and magnetic field fluctuations. METHOD...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35861268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29385 |
_version_ | 1784804843241603072 |
---|---|
author | Gundogdu, Batuhan Pittman, Jay M. Chatterjee, Aritrick Szasz, Teodora Lee, Grace Giurcanu, Mihai Medved, Milica Engelmann, Roger Guo, Xiaodong Yousuf, Ambereen Antic, Tatjana Devaraj, Ajit Fan, Xiaobing Oto, Aytekin Karczmar, Gregory S. |
author_facet | Gundogdu, Batuhan Pittman, Jay M. Chatterjee, Aritrick Szasz, Teodora Lee, Grace Giurcanu, Mihai Medved, Milica Engelmann, Roger Guo, Xiaodong Yousuf, Ambereen Antic, Tatjana Devaraj, Ajit Fan, Xiaobing Oto, Aytekin Karczmar, Gregory S. |
author_sort | Gundogdu, Batuhan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate and quantify inter‐directional and inter‐acquisition variation in diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) and emphasize signals that report restricted diffusion to enhance cancer conspicuity, while reducing the effects of local microscopic motion and magnetic field fluctuations. METHODS: Ten patients with biopsy‐proven prostate cancer were studied under an Institutional Review Board‐approved protocol. Individual acquisitions of DWI signal intensities were reconstructed to calculate inter‐acquisition distributions and their statistics, which were compared for healthy versus cancer tissue. A method was proposed to detect and filter the acquisitions affected by motion‐induced signal loss. First, signals that reflect restricted diffusion were separated from the acquisitions that suffer from signal loss, likely due to microscopic motion, by imposing a cutoff value. Furthermore, corrected apparent diffusion coefficient maps were calculated by employing a weighted sum of the multiple acquisitions, instead of conventional averaging. These weights were calculated by applying a soft‐max function to the set of acquisitions per‐voxel, making the analysis immune to acquisitions with significant signal loss, even if the number of such acquisitions is high. RESULTS: Inter‐acquisition variation is much larger than the Rician noise variance, local spatial variations, and the estimates of diffusion anisotropy based on the current data, as well as the published values of anisotropy. The proposed method increases the contrast for cancers and yields a sensitivity of [Formula: see text] with a false positive rate of [Formula: see text]. CONCLUSION: Motion‐induced signal loss makes conventional signal‐averaging suboptimal and can obscure signals from areas with restricted diffusion. Filtering or weighting individual acquisitions prior to image analysis can overcome this problem. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9545544 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95455442022-10-14 Directional and inter‐acquisition variability in diffusion‐weighted imaging and editing for restricted diffusion Gundogdu, Batuhan Pittman, Jay M. Chatterjee, Aritrick Szasz, Teodora Lee, Grace Giurcanu, Mihai Medved, Milica Engelmann, Roger Guo, Xiaodong Yousuf, Ambereen Antic, Tatjana Devaraj, Ajit Fan, Xiaobing Oto, Aytekin Karczmar, Gregory S. Magn Reson Med Research Articles–Computer Processing and Modeling PURPOSE: To evaluate and quantify inter‐directional and inter‐acquisition variation in diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) and emphasize signals that report restricted diffusion to enhance cancer conspicuity, while reducing the effects of local microscopic motion and magnetic field fluctuations. METHODS: Ten patients with biopsy‐proven prostate cancer were studied under an Institutional Review Board‐approved protocol. Individual acquisitions of DWI signal intensities were reconstructed to calculate inter‐acquisition distributions and their statistics, which were compared for healthy versus cancer tissue. A method was proposed to detect and filter the acquisitions affected by motion‐induced signal loss. First, signals that reflect restricted diffusion were separated from the acquisitions that suffer from signal loss, likely due to microscopic motion, by imposing a cutoff value. Furthermore, corrected apparent diffusion coefficient maps were calculated by employing a weighted sum of the multiple acquisitions, instead of conventional averaging. These weights were calculated by applying a soft‐max function to the set of acquisitions per‐voxel, making the analysis immune to acquisitions with significant signal loss, even if the number of such acquisitions is high. RESULTS: Inter‐acquisition variation is much larger than the Rician noise variance, local spatial variations, and the estimates of diffusion anisotropy based on the current data, as well as the published values of anisotropy. The proposed method increases the contrast for cancers and yields a sensitivity of [Formula: see text] with a false positive rate of [Formula: see text]. CONCLUSION: Motion‐induced signal loss makes conventional signal‐averaging suboptimal and can obscure signals from areas with restricted diffusion. Filtering or weighting individual acquisitions prior to image analysis can overcome this problem. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-21 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9545544/ /pubmed/35861268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29385 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles–Computer Processing and Modeling Gundogdu, Batuhan Pittman, Jay M. Chatterjee, Aritrick Szasz, Teodora Lee, Grace Giurcanu, Mihai Medved, Milica Engelmann, Roger Guo, Xiaodong Yousuf, Ambereen Antic, Tatjana Devaraj, Ajit Fan, Xiaobing Oto, Aytekin Karczmar, Gregory S. Directional and inter‐acquisition variability in diffusion‐weighted imaging and editing for restricted diffusion |
title | Directional and inter‐acquisition variability in diffusion‐weighted imaging and editing for restricted diffusion |
title_full | Directional and inter‐acquisition variability in diffusion‐weighted imaging and editing for restricted diffusion |
title_fullStr | Directional and inter‐acquisition variability in diffusion‐weighted imaging and editing for restricted diffusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Directional and inter‐acquisition variability in diffusion‐weighted imaging and editing for restricted diffusion |
title_short | Directional and inter‐acquisition variability in diffusion‐weighted imaging and editing for restricted diffusion |
title_sort | directional and inter‐acquisition variability in diffusion‐weighted imaging and editing for restricted diffusion |
topic | Research Articles–Computer Processing and Modeling |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35861268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29385 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gundogdubatuhan directionalandinteracquisitionvariabilityindiffusionweightedimagingandeditingforrestricteddiffusion AT pittmanjaym directionalandinteracquisitionvariabilityindiffusionweightedimagingandeditingforrestricteddiffusion AT chatterjeearitrick directionalandinteracquisitionvariabilityindiffusionweightedimagingandeditingforrestricteddiffusion AT szaszteodora directionalandinteracquisitionvariabilityindiffusionweightedimagingandeditingforrestricteddiffusion AT leegrace directionalandinteracquisitionvariabilityindiffusionweightedimagingandeditingforrestricteddiffusion AT giurcanumihai directionalandinteracquisitionvariabilityindiffusionweightedimagingandeditingforrestricteddiffusion AT medvedmilica directionalandinteracquisitionvariabilityindiffusionweightedimagingandeditingforrestricteddiffusion AT engelmannroger directionalandinteracquisitionvariabilityindiffusionweightedimagingandeditingforrestricteddiffusion AT guoxiaodong directionalandinteracquisitionvariabilityindiffusionweightedimagingandeditingforrestricteddiffusion AT yousufambereen directionalandinteracquisitionvariabilityindiffusionweightedimagingandeditingforrestricteddiffusion AT antictatjana directionalandinteracquisitionvariabilityindiffusionweightedimagingandeditingforrestricteddiffusion AT devarajajit directionalandinteracquisitionvariabilityindiffusionweightedimagingandeditingforrestricteddiffusion AT fanxiaobing directionalandinteracquisitionvariabilityindiffusionweightedimagingandeditingforrestricteddiffusion AT otoaytekin directionalandinteracquisitionvariabilityindiffusionweightedimagingandeditingforrestricteddiffusion AT karczmargregorys directionalandinteracquisitionvariabilityindiffusionweightedimagingandeditingforrestricteddiffusion |