Cargando…
Emotion regulation patterns: Capturing variability and flexibility in emotion regulation in an experience sampling study
Variability and flexibility in emotion regulation (ER) are considered important ingredients in adaptive ER. Few attempts at operationalizing variability and flexibility in ER have been made. In two 10‐day experience sampling studies (N = 51 and 39), healthy participants rated their momentary emotion...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12808 |
_version_ | 1784804848456171520 |
---|---|
author | Elkjær, Emma Mikkelsen, Mai B. O'Toole, Mia Skytte |
author_facet | Elkjær, Emma Mikkelsen, Mai B. O'Toole, Mia Skytte |
author_sort | Elkjær, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | Variability and flexibility in emotion regulation (ER) are considered important ingredients in adaptive ER. Few attempts at operationalizing variability and flexibility in ER have been made. In two 10‐day experience sampling studies (N = 51 and 39), healthy participants rated their momentary emotions and their ER efforts in response to those emotions. We evaluated the association between ER (i.e., between and within ER strategy variability and ER flexibility, operationalized as putatively adaptive, putatively maladaptive and total strategies) and measures of well‐being (psychological distress, satisfaction with life) in general (person‐level) and in everyday life (day‐level). Higher within‐variability indicated that a strategy was used more at some occasions and less at others. Higher between‐variability indicated variation in the extent to which different strategies were engaged at the same time point. Overall, results were mixed, but in some instances, indicators of ER variability and ER flexibility were related to each other and measures of well‐being differently. Total within ER variability was negatively associated with well‐being at the person and day level. Putatively adaptive between and within ER variability were associated with less well‐being at the person level. At the day level, putatively adaptive and maladaptive between ER variability and maladaptive within ER variability were negatively associated with well‐being. Putatively adaptive ER flexibility was negatively associated with satisfaction with life. This study adds to the literature on indicators of variability and flexibility in ER and their potential adaptiveness. The results indicate that variability in ER could be a maladaptive property, but more research is needed to understand this in terms of putatively adaptive and maladaptive strategies. Future studies on the adaptiveness of these indicators should obtain more contextual information. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9545567 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95455672022-10-14 Emotion regulation patterns: Capturing variability and flexibility in emotion regulation in an experience sampling study Elkjær, Emma Mikkelsen, Mai B. O'Toole, Mia Skytte Scand J Psychol Cognition and Neurosciences Variability and flexibility in emotion regulation (ER) are considered important ingredients in adaptive ER. Few attempts at operationalizing variability and flexibility in ER have been made. In two 10‐day experience sampling studies (N = 51 and 39), healthy participants rated their momentary emotions and their ER efforts in response to those emotions. We evaluated the association between ER (i.e., between and within ER strategy variability and ER flexibility, operationalized as putatively adaptive, putatively maladaptive and total strategies) and measures of well‐being (psychological distress, satisfaction with life) in general (person‐level) and in everyday life (day‐level). Higher within‐variability indicated that a strategy was used more at some occasions and less at others. Higher between‐variability indicated variation in the extent to which different strategies were engaged at the same time point. Overall, results were mixed, but in some instances, indicators of ER variability and ER flexibility were related to each other and measures of well‐being differently. Total within ER variability was negatively associated with well‐being at the person and day level. Putatively adaptive between and within ER variability were associated with less well‐being at the person level. At the day level, putatively adaptive and maladaptive between ER variability and maladaptive within ER variability were negatively associated with well‐being. Putatively adaptive ER flexibility was negatively associated with satisfaction with life. This study adds to the literature on indicators of variability and flexibility in ER and their potential adaptiveness. The results indicate that variability in ER could be a maladaptive property, but more research is needed to understand this in terms of putatively adaptive and maladaptive strategies. Future studies on the adaptiveness of these indicators should obtain more contextual information. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-21 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9545567/ /pubmed/35313004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12808 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology published by Scandinavian Psychological Associations and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Cognition and Neurosciences Elkjær, Emma Mikkelsen, Mai B. O'Toole, Mia Skytte Emotion regulation patterns: Capturing variability and flexibility in emotion regulation in an experience sampling study |
title | Emotion regulation patterns: Capturing variability and flexibility in emotion regulation in an experience sampling study |
title_full | Emotion regulation patterns: Capturing variability and flexibility in emotion regulation in an experience sampling study |
title_fullStr | Emotion regulation patterns: Capturing variability and flexibility in emotion regulation in an experience sampling study |
title_full_unstemmed | Emotion regulation patterns: Capturing variability and flexibility in emotion regulation in an experience sampling study |
title_short | Emotion regulation patterns: Capturing variability and flexibility in emotion regulation in an experience sampling study |
title_sort | emotion regulation patterns: capturing variability and flexibility in emotion regulation in an experience sampling study |
topic | Cognition and Neurosciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12808 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elkjæremma emotionregulationpatternscapturingvariabilityandflexibilityinemotionregulationinanexperiencesamplingstudy AT mikkelsenmaib emotionregulationpatternscapturingvariabilityandflexibilityinemotionregulationinanexperiencesamplingstudy AT otoolemiaskytte emotionregulationpatternscapturingvariabilityandflexibilityinemotionregulationinanexperiencesamplingstudy |