Cargando…

Emotion regulation patterns: Capturing variability and flexibility in emotion regulation in an experience sampling study

Variability and flexibility in emotion regulation (ER) are considered important ingredients in adaptive ER. Few attempts at operationalizing variability and flexibility in ER have been made. In two 10‐day experience sampling studies (N = 51 and 39), healthy participants rated their momentary emotion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elkjær, Emma, Mikkelsen, Mai B., O'Toole, Mia Skytte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12808
_version_ 1784804848456171520
author Elkjær, Emma
Mikkelsen, Mai B.
O'Toole, Mia Skytte
author_facet Elkjær, Emma
Mikkelsen, Mai B.
O'Toole, Mia Skytte
author_sort Elkjær, Emma
collection PubMed
description Variability and flexibility in emotion regulation (ER) are considered important ingredients in adaptive ER. Few attempts at operationalizing variability and flexibility in ER have been made. In two 10‐day experience sampling studies (N = 51 and 39), healthy participants rated their momentary emotions and their ER efforts in response to those emotions. We evaluated the association between ER (i.e., between and within ER strategy variability and ER flexibility, operationalized as putatively adaptive, putatively maladaptive and total strategies) and measures of well‐being (psychological distress, satisfaction with life) in general (person‐level) and in everyday life (day‐level). Higher within‐variability indicated that a strategy was used more at some occasions and less at others. Higher between‐variability indicated variation in the extent to which different strategies were engaged at the same time point. Overall, results were mixed, but in some instances, indicators of ER variability and ER flexibility were related to each other and measures of well‐being differently. Total within ER variability was negatively associated with well‐being at the person and day level. Putatively adaptive between and within ER variability were associated with less well‐being at the person level. At the day level, putatively adaptive and maladaptive between ER variability and maladaptive within ER variability were negatively associated with well‐being. Putatively adaptive ER flexibility was negatively associated with satisfaction with life. This study adds to the literature on indicators of variability and flexibility in ER and their potential adaptiveness. The results indicate that variability in ER could be a maladaptive property, but more research is needed to understand this in terms of putatively adaptive and maladaptive strategies. Future studies on the adaptiveness of these indicators should obtain more contextual information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9545567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95455672022-10-14 Emotion regulation patterns: Capturing variability and flexibility in emotion regulation in an experience sampling study Elkjær, Emma Mikkelsen, Mai B. O'Toole, Mia Skytte Scand J Psychol Cognition and Neurosciences Variability and flexibility in emotion regulation (ER) are considered important ingredients in adaptive ER. Few attempts at operationalizing variability and flexibility in ER have been made. In two 10‐day experience sampling studies (N = 51 and 39), healthy participants rated their momentary emotions and their ER efforts in response to those emotions. We evaluated the association between ER (i.e., between and within ER strategy variability and ER flexibility, operationalized as putatively adaptive, putatively maladaptive and total strategies) and measures of well‐being (psychological distress, satisfaction with life) in general (person‐level) and in everyday life (day‐level). Higher within‐variability indicated that a strategy was used more at some occasions and less at others. Higher between‐variability indicated variation in the extent to which different strategies were engaged at the same time point. Overall, results were mixed, but in some instances, indicators of ER variability and ER flexibility were related to each other and measures of well‐being differently. Total within ER variability was negatively associated with well‐being at the person and day level. Putatively adaptive between and within ER variability were associated with less well‐being at the person level. At the day level, putatively adaptive and maladaptive between ER variability and maladaptive within ER variability were negatively associated with well‐being. Putatively adaptive ER flexibility was negatively associated with satisfaction with life. This study adds to the literature on indicators of variability and flexibility in ER and their potential adaptiveness. The results indicate that variability in ER could be a maladaptive property, but more research is needed to understand this in terms of putatively adaptive and maladaptive strategies. Future studies on the adaptiveness of these indicators should obtain more contextual information. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-21 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9545567/ /pubmed/35313004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12808 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology published by Scandinavian Psychological Associations and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Cognition and Neurosciences
Elkjær, Emma
Mikkelsen, Mai B.
O'Toole, Mia Skytte
Emotion regulation patterns: Capturing variability and flexibility in emotion regulation in an experience sampling study
title Emotion regulation patterns: Capturing variability and flexibility in emotion regulation in an experience sampling study
title_full Emotion regulation patterns: Capturing variability and flexibility in emotion regulation in an experience sampling study
title_fullStr Emotion regulation patterns: Capturing variability and flexibility in emotion regulation in an experience sampling study
title_full_unstemmed Emotion regulation patterns: Capturing variability and flexibility in emotion regulation in an experience sampling study
title_short Emotion regulation patterns: Capturing variability and flexibility in emotion regulation in an experience sampling study
title_sort emotion regulation patterns: capturing variability and flexibility in emotion regulation in an experience sampling study
topic Cognition and Neurosciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12808
work_keys_str_mv AT elkjæremma emotionregulationpatternscapturingvariabilityandflexibilityinemotionregulationinanexperiencesamplingstudy
AT mikkelsenmaib emotionregulationpatternscapturingvariabilityandflexibilityinemotionregulationinanexperiencesamplingstudy
AT otoolemiaskytte emotionregulationpatternscapturingvariabilityandflexibilityinemotionregulationinanexperiencesamplingstudy