Cargando…

Phase II trial of nivolumab monotherapy and biomarker screening in patients with chemo‐refractory germ cell tumors

OBJECTIVES: Germ cell tumors are highly susceptible to chemotherapy; however, there is a lack of established treatments for consistently relapsing germ cell tumor. Therefore, in this phase II study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab for relapsed germ cell tumor. METHODS: Seventeen ad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kawahara, Takashi, Kawai, Koji, Kojima, Takahiro, Nagumo, Yoshiyuki, Sakka, Shotarou, Kandori, Shuya, Negoro, Hiromitsu, Mathis, Bryan J, Maruo, Kazushi, Miura, Koji, Sakamoto, Noriaki, Shinohara, Nobuo, Yamashita, Shinichi, Yonemori, Kan, Kishida, Takeshi, Ukimura, Osamu, Nishimura, Kazuo, Kobayashi, Yasuyuki, Nishiyama, Hiroyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35462438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iju.14885
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Germ cell tumors are highly susceptible to chemotherapy; however, there is a lack of established treatments for consistently relapsing germ cell tumor. Therefore, in this phase II study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab for relapsed germ cell tumor. METHODS: Seventeen adult patients (median age 34 years) with refractory primary germ cell tumor after second‐line or higher chemotherapy were enrolled. Nivolumab was administered over 30 min at 240 mg/body every 2 weeks until disease progression or intolerable adverse event occurrence. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate. RESULT: We performed a biomarker analysis of programmed death ligand‐1 expression and genomic sequencing. Tumor histology revealed nonseminoma and seminoma in 14 and three patients, respectively. Patients were pretreated with a median of three chemotherapy lines, and three patients received high‐dose chemotherapy. The median number of nivolumab doses was 3 (range 2–46). One patient showed a partial response and three showed stable disease. Responses were durable in one patient with a partial response and one patient with stable disease (median 90 and 68 weeks, respectively). Nivolumab was well‐tolerated, with only two Grade 3 adverse events observed. Programmed death ligand‐1 expression was not associated with objective responses. Genomic sequencing revealed a high tumor mutation burden in a patient with a durable partial response. While a small subset of chemorefractory germ cell tumors may respond to nivolumab, programmed death ligand‐1 is unreliable to measure response. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor mutation burden is a potential biomarker for future testing of germ cell tumor response.