Cargando…

The role of Australian clinical quality registries in pregnancy care: A scoping review

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy represents a time of increased morbidity and mortality for women and their infants. Clinical quality registries (CQRs) collect, analyse and report key healthcare quality indicators for patient cohorts to improve patient care. There are limited data regarding existing CQRs in pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campion, Tarun Sai David, Daly, J. Oliver, Wake, Melissa, Ahern, Susannah, Said, Joanne M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35538882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13540
_version_ 1784804874073931776
author Campion, Tarun Sai David
Daly, J. Oliver
Wake, Melissa
Ahern, Susannah
Said, Joanne M.
author_facet Campion, Tarun Sai David
Daly, J. Oliver
Wake, Melissa
Ahern, Susannah
Said, Joanne M.
author_sort Campion, Tarun Sai David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pregnancy represents a time of increased morbidity and mortality for women and their infants. Clinical quality registries (CQRs) collect, analyse and report key healthcare quality indicators for patient cohorts to improve patient care. There are limited data regarding existing CQRs in pregnancy. This scoping review aimed to: (1) identify Australian CQRs specific to pregnancy care and describe their general characteristics; and (2) outline their aims and measured outcomes METHODS: The scoping review was undertaken according to Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. CQRs were identified using a systematic approach from publications (Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar), peer consultation, the Australian register of clinical registries and web searches. Details surrounding general characteristics, aims and outcomes were collated. RESULTS: We identified two primary sources of information about pregnancy care. (1) Six CQRs are specific to pregnancy (Australia and New Zealand twin‐twin transfusion syndrome registry, Australian Pregnancy Register for women with epilepsy and those taking anti‐epileptic drugs, National Register of Antipsychotic Medication in Pregnancy, Australasian Maternity Outcomes Surveillance System, Neonatal Alloimmune Thrombocytopaenia Registry and the Diabetes in Pregnancy clinical register). (2) Fourteen observational cohort studies were facilitated by non‐pregnancy‐specific CQRs where a subsection of patients underwent pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Australian CQRs currently report varied information regarding some selected conditions during pregnancy and offer therapeutic and epidemiological insight into their care. Further research into their effectiveness is warranted. We note the lack of a CQR spanning the common problems of pregnancy in general, where significant health, service and economic gains are possible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9545682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95456822022-10-14 The role of Australian clinical quality registries in pregnancy care: A scoping review Campion, Tarun Sai David Daly, J. Oliver Wake, Melissa Ahern, Susannah Said, Joanne M. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Pregnancy represents a time of increased morbidity and mortality for women and their infants. Clinical quality registries (CQRs) collect, analyse and report key healthcare quality indicators for patient cohorts to improve patient care. There are limited data regarding existing CQRs in pregnancy. This scoping review aimed to: (1) identify Australian CQRs specific to pregnancy care and describe their general characteristics; and (2) outline their aims and measured outcomes METHODS: The scoping review was undertaken according to Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. CQRs were identified using a systematic approach from publications (Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar), peer consultation, the Australian register of clinical registries and web searches. Details surrounding general characteristics, aims and outcomes were collated. RESULTS: We identified two primary sources of information about pregnancy care. (1) Six CQRs are specific to pregnancy (Australia and New Zealand twin‐twin transfusion syndrome registry, Australian Pregnancy Register for women with epilepsy and those taking anti‐epileptic drugs, National Register of Antipsychotic Medication in Pregnancy, Australasian Maternity Outcomes Surveillance System, Neonatal Alloimmune Thrombocytopaenia Registry and the Diabetes in Pregnancy clinical register). (2) Fourteen observational cohort studies were facilitated by non‐pregnancy‐specific CQRs where a subsection of patients underwent pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Australian CQRs currently report varied information regarding some selected conditions during pregnancy and offer therapeutic and epidemiological insight into their care. Further research into their effectiveness is warranted. We note the lack of a CQR spanning the common problems of pregnancy in general, where significant health, service and economic gains are possible. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-11 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9545682/ /pubmed/35538882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13540 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Campion, Tarun Sai David
Daly, J. Oliver
Wake, Melissa
Ahern, Susannah
Said, Joanne M.
The role of Australian clinical quality registries in pregnancy care: A scoping review
title The role of Australian clinical quality registries in pregnancy care: A scoping review
title_full The role of Australian clinical quality registries in pregnancy care: A scoping review
title_fullStr The role of Australian clinical quality registries in pregnancy care: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed The role of Australian clinical quality registries in pregnancy care: A scoping review
title_short The role of Australian clinical quality registries in pregnancy care: A scoping review
title_sort role of australian clinical quality registries in pregnancy care: a scoping review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35538882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13540
work_keys_str_mv AT campiontarunsaidavid theroleofaustralianclinicalqualityregistriesinpregnancycareascopingreview
AT dalyjoliver theroleofaustralianclinicalqualityregistriesinpregnancycareascopingreview
AT wakemelissa theroleofaustralianclinicalqualityregistriesinpregnancycareascopingreview
AT ahernsusannah theroleofaustralianclinicalqualityregistriesinpregnancycareascopingreview
AT saidjoannem theroleofaustralianclinicalqualityregistriesinpregnancycareascopingreview
AT campiontarunsaidavid roleofaustralianclinicalqualityregistriesinpregnancycareascopingreview
AT dalyjoliver roleofaustralianclinicalqualityregistriesinpregnancycareascopingreview
AT wakemelissa roleofaustralianclinicalqualityregistriesinpregnancycareascopingreview
AT ahernsusannah roleofaustralianclinicalqualityregistriesinpregnancycareascopingreview
AT saidjoannem roleofaustralianclinicalqualityregistriesinpregnancycareascopingreview