Cargando…
The role of Australian clinical quality registries in pregnancy care: A scoping review
BACKGROUND: Pregnancy represents a time of increased morbidity and mortality for women and their infants. Clinical quality registries (CQRs) collect, analyse and report key healthcare quality indicators for patient cohorts to improve patient care. There are limited data regarding existing CQRs in pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35538882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13540 |
_version_ | 1784804874073931776 |
---|---|
author | Campion, Tarun Sai David Daly, J. Oliver Wake, Melissa Ahern, Susannah Said, Joanne M. |
author_facet | Campion, Tarun Sai David Daly, J. Oliver Wake, Melissa Ahern, Susannah Said, Joanne M. |
author_sort | Campion, Tarun Sai David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pregnancy represents a time of increased morbidity and mortality for women and their infants. Clinical quality registries (CQRs) collect, analyse and report key healthcare quality indicators for patient cohorts to improve patient care. There are limited data regarding existing CQRs in pregnancy. This scoping review aimed to: (1) identify Australian CQRs specific to pregnancy care and describe their general characteristics; and (2) outline their aims and measured outcomes METHODS: The scoping review was undertaken according to Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. CQRs were identified using a systematic approach from publications (Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar), peer consultation, the Australian register of clinical registries and web searches. Details surrounding general characteristics, aims and outcomes were collated. RESULTS: We identified two primary sources of information about pregnancy care. (1) Six CQRs are specific to pregnancy (Australia and New Zealand twin‐twin transfusion syndrome registry, Australian Pregnancy Register for women with epilepsy and those taking anti‐epileptic drugs, National Register of Antipsychotic Medication in Pregnancy, Australasian Maternity Outcomes Surveillance System, Neonatal Alloimmune Thrombocytopaenia Registry and the Diabetes in Pregnancy clinical register). (2) Fourteen observational cohort studies were facilitated by non‐pregnancy‐specific CQRs where a subsection of patients underwent pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Australian CQRs currently report varied information regarding some selected conditions during pregnancy and offer therapeutic and epidemiological insight into their care. Further research into their effectiveness is warranted. We note the lack of a CQR spanning the common problems of pregnancy in general, where significant health, service and economic gains are possible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9545682 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95456822022-10-14 The role of Australian clinical quality registries in pregnancy care: A scoping review Campion, Tarun Sai David Daly, J. Oliver Wake, Melissa Ahern, Susannah Said, Joanne M. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Pregnancy represents a time of increased morbidity and mortality for women and their infants. Clinical quality registries (CQRs) collect, analyse and report key healthcare quality indicators for patient cohorts to improve patient care. There are limited data regarding existing CQRs in pregnancy. This scoping review aimed to: (1) identify Australian CQRs specific to pregnancy care and describe their general characteristics; and (2) outline their aims and measured outcomes METHODS: The scoping review was undertaken according to Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. CQRs were identified using a systematic approach from publications (Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar), peer consultation, the Australian register of clinical registries and web searches. Details surrounding general characteristics, aims and outcomes were collated. RESULTS: We identified two primary sources of information about pregnancy care. (1) Six CQRs are specific to pregnancy (Australia and New Zealand twin‐twin transfusion syndrome registry, Australian Pregnancy Register for women with epilepsy and those taking anti‐epileptic drugs, National Register of Antipsychotic Medication in Pregnancy, Australasian Maternity Outcomes Surveillance System, Neonatal Alloimmune Thrombocytopaenia Registry and the Diabetes in Pregnancy clinical register). (2) Fourteen observational cohort studies were facilitated by non‐pregnancy‐specific CQRs where a subsection of patients underwent pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Australian CQRs currently report varied information regarding some selected conditions during pregnancy and offer therapeutic and epidemiological insight into their care. Further research into their effectiveness is warranted. We note the lack of a CQR spanning the common problems of pregnancy in general, where significant health, service and economic gains are possible. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-11 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9545682/ /pubmed/35538882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13540 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Campion, Tarun Sai David Daly, J. Oliver Wake, Melissa Ahern, Susannah Said, Joanne M. The role of Australian clinical quality registries in pregnancy care: A scoping review |
title | The role of Australian clinical quality registries in pregnancy care: A scoping review |
title_full | The role of Australian clinical quality registries in pregnancy care: A scoping review |
title_fullStr | The role of Australian clinical quality registries in pregnancy care: A scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | The role of Australian clinical quality registries in pregnancy care: A scoping review |
title_short | The role of Australian clinical quality registries in pregnancy care: A scoping review |
title_sort | role of australian clinical quality registries in pregnancy care: a scoping review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35538882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13540 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT campiontarunsaidavid theroleofaustralianclinicalqualityregistriesinpregnancycareascopingreview AT dalyjoliver theroleofaustralianclinicalqualityregistriesinpregnancycareascopingreview AT wakemelissa theroleofaustralianclinicalqualityregistriesinpregnancycareascopingreview AT ahernsusannah theroleofaustralianclinicalqualityregistriesinpregnancycareascopingreview AT saidjoannem theroleofaustralianclinicalqualityregistriesinpregnancycareascopingreview AT campiontarunsaidavid roleofaustralianclinicalqualityregistriesinpregnancycareascopingreview AT dalyjoliver roleofaustralianclinicalqualityregistriesinpregnancycareascopingreview AT wakemelissa roleofaustralianclinicalqualityregistriesinpregnancycareascopingreview AT ahernsusannah roleofaustralianclinicalqualityregistriesinpregnancycareascopingreview AT saidjoannem roleofaustralianclinicalqualityregistriesinpregnancycareascopingreview |