Cargando…

A health action process approach for developing invitee endorsed interventions to increase mail‐out bowel cancer screening

Theory‐based, user‐informed interventions are needed to increase the low participation rates of population‐based faecal occult blood test (FOBT) bowel cancer screening. This study investigated the theoretical fit of the health action process approach (HAPA) for home FOBT screening and measured scree...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Myers, Larry, Goodwin, Belinda, Ralph, Nicholas, March, Sonja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35107867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12346
_version_ 1784804877724024832
author Myers, Larry
Goodwin, Belinda
Ralph, Nicholas
March, Sonja
author_facet Myers, Larry
Goodwin, Belinda
Ralph, Nicholas
March, Sonja
author_sort Myers, Larry
collection PubMed
description Theory‐based, user‐informed interventions are needed to increase the low participation rates of population‐based faecal occult blood test (FOBT) bowel cancer screening. This study investigated the theoretical fit of the health action process approach (HAPA) for home FOBT screening and measured screening invitees' attitudes towards different intervention strategies. A cross‐sectional sample (n = 377), aged 50–74 years, participated in this study. Two scales were created for this study. The process approach to mail‐out screening (PAMS) scale measured HAPA constructs, and the user ratings of mail‐out screening interventions (UR‐MSI) scale measured attitudes towards different intervention strategies. Structural equation modelling was used to assess the fit of PAMS scale responses to the HAPA model, and descriptive statistics were calculated for UR‐MSI responses. PAMS results showed acceptable model fit, CFI = .968, RMSEA = .050 and explained 49.9% of the variation in FOBT screening participation. Positive ratings of interventions ranged from 20.47%, an intervention prompting planning to complete the FOBT kit, to 72.25%, an intervention promoting the positive health outcome associated with FOBT screening. Intervention strategies should be combined such that they target all factors specified within the HAPA model. User‐informed intervention design should be used to effectively facilitate FOBT uptake in the community.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9545699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95456992022-10-14 A health action process approach for developing invitee endorsed interventions to increase mail‐out bowel cancer screening Myers, Larry Goodwin, Belinda Ralph, Nicholas March, Sonja Appl Psychol Health Well Being Original Articles Theory‐based, user‐informed interventions are needed to increase the low participation rates of population‐based faecal occult blood test (FOBT) bowel cancer screening. This study investigated the theoretical fit of the health action process approach (HAPA) for home FOBT screening and measured screening invitees' attitudes towards different intervention strategies. A cross‐sectional sample (n = 377), aged 50–74 years, participated in this study. Two scales were created for this study. The process approach to mail‐out screening (PAMS) scale measured HAPA constructs, and the user ratings of mail‐out screening interventions (UR‐MSI) scale measured attitudes towards different intervention strategies. Structural equation modelling was used to assess the fit of PAMS scale responses to the HAPA model, and descriptive statistics were calculated for UR‐MSI responses. PAMS results showed acceptable model fit, CFI = .968, RMSEA = .050 and explained 49.9% of the variation in FOBT screening participation. Positive ratings of interventions ranged from 20.47%, an intervention prompting planning to complete the FOBT kit, to 72.25%, an intervention promoting the positive health outcome associated with FOBT screening. Intervention strategies should be combined such that they target all factors specified within the HAPA model. User‐informed intervention design should be used to effectively facilitate FOBT uptake in the community. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-02 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9545699/ /pubmed/35107867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12346 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Association of Applied Psychology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Myers, Larry
Goodwin, Belinda
Ralph, Nicholas
March, Sonja
A health action process approach for developing invitee endorsed interventions to increase mail‐out bowel cancer screening
title A health action process approach for developing invitee endorsed interventions to increase mail‐out bowel cancer screening
title_full A health action process approach for developing invitee endorsed interventions to increase mail‐out bowel cancer screening
title_fullStr A health action process approach for developing invitee endorsed interventions to increase mail‐out bowel cancer screening
title_full_unstemmed A health action process approach for developing invitee endorsed interventions to increase mail‐out bowel cancer screening
title_short A health action process approach for developing invitee endorsed interventions to increase mail‐out bowel cancer screening
title_sort health action process approach for developing invitee endorsed interventions to increase mail‐out bowel cancer screening
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35107867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12346
work_keys_str_mv AT myerslarry ahealthactionprocessapproachfordevelopinginviteeendorsedinterventionstoincreasemailoutbowelcancerscreening
AT goodwinbelinda ahealthactionprocessapproachfordevelopinginviteeendorsedinterventionstoincreasemailoutbowelcancerscreening
AT ralphnicholas ahealthactionprocessapproachfordevelopinginviteeendorsedinterventionstoincreasemailoutbowelcancerscreening
AT marchsonja ahealthactionprocessapproachfordevelopinginviteeendorsedinterventionstoincreasemailoutbowelcancerscreening
AT myerslarry healthactionprocessapproachfordevelopinginviteeendorsedinterventionstoincreasemailoutbowelcancerscreening
AT goodwinbelinda healthactionprocessapproachfordevelopinginviteeendorsedinterventionstoincreasemailoutbowelcancerscreening
AT ralphnicholas healthactionprocessapproachfordevelopinginviteeendorsedinterventionstoincreasemailoutbowelcancerscreening
AT marchsonja healthactionprocessapproachfordevelopinginviteeendorsedinterventionstoincreasemailoutbowelcancerscreening