Cargando…
A health action process approach for developing invitee endorsed interventions to increase mail‐out bowel cancer screening
Theory‐based, user‐informed interventions are needed to increase the low participation rates of population‐based faecal occult blood test (FOBT) bowel cancer screening. This study investigated the theoretical fit of the health action process approach (HAPA) for home FOBT screening and measured scree...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35107867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12346 |
_version_ | 1784804877724024832 |
---|---|
author | Myers, Larry Goodwin, Belinda Ralph, Nicholas March, Sonja |
author_facet | Myers, Larry Goodwin, Belinda Ralph, Nicholas March, Sonja |
author_sort | Myers, Larry |
collection | PubMed |
description | Theory‐based, user‐informed interventions are needed to increase the low participation rates of population‐based faecal occult blood test (FOBT) bowel cancer screening. This study investigated the theoretical fit of the health action process approach (HAPA) for home FOBT screening and measured screening invitees' attitudes towards different intervention strategies. A cross‐sectional sample (n = 377), aged 50–74 years, participated in this study. Two scales were created for this study. The process approach to mail‐out screening (PAMS) scale measured HAPA constructs, and the user ratings of mail‐out screening interventions (UR‐MSI) scale measured attitudes towards different intervention strategies. Structural equation modelling was used to assess the fit of PAMS scale responses to the HAPA model, and descriptive statistics were calculated for UR‐MSI responses. PAMS results showed acceptable model fit, CFI = .968, RMSEA = .050 and explained 49.9% of the variation in FOBT screening participation. Positive ratings of interventions ranged from 20.47%, an intervention prompting planning to complete the FOBT kit, to 72.25%, an intervention promoting the positive health outcome associated with FOBT screening. Intervention strategies should be combined such that they target all factors specified within the HAPA model. User‐informed intervention design should be used to effectively facilitate FOBT uptake in the community. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9545699 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95456992022-10-14 A health action process approach for developing invitee endorsed interventions to increase mail‐out bowel cancer screening Myers, Larry Goodwin, Belinda Ralph, Nicholas March, Sonja Appl Psychol Health Well Being Original Articles Theory‐based, user‐informed interventions are needed to increase the low participation rates of population‐based faecal occult blood test (FOBT) bowel cancer screening. This study investigated the theoretical fit of the health action process approach (HAPA) for home FOBT screening and measured screening invitees' attitudes towards different intervention strategies. A cross‐sectional sample (n = 377), aged 50–74 years, participated in this study. Two scales were created for this study. The process approach to mail‐out screening (PAMS) scale measured HAPA constructs, and the user ratings of mail‐out screening interventions (UR‐MSI) scale measured attitudes towards different intervention strategies. Structural equation modelling was used to assess the fit of PAMS scale responses to the HAPA model, and descriptive statistics were calculated for UR‐MSI responses. PAMS results showed acceptable model fit, CFI = .968, RMSEA = .050 and explained 49.9% of the variation in FOBT screening participation. Positive ratings of interventions ranged from 20.47%, an intervention prompting planning to complete the FOBT kit, to 72.25%, an intervention promoting the positive health outcome associated with FOBT screening. Intervention strategies should be combined such that they target all factors specified within the HAPA model. User‐informed intervention design should be used to effectively facilitate FOBT uptake in the community. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-02 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9545699/ /pubmed/35107867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12346 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Association of Applied Psychology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Myers, Larry Goodwin, Belinda Ralph, Nicholas March, Sonja A health action process approach for developing invitee endorsed interventions to increase mail‐out bowel cancer screening |
title | A health action process approach for developing invitee endorsed interventions to increase mail‐out bowel cancer screening |
title_full | A health action process approach for developing invitee endorsed interventions to increase mail‐out bowel cancer screening |
title_fullStr | A health action process approach for developing invitee endorsed interventions to increase mail‐out bowel cancer screening |
title_full_unstemmed | A health action process approach for developing invitee endorsed interventions to increase mail‐out bowel cancer screening |
title_short | A health action process approach for developing invitee endorsed interventions to increase mail‐out bowel cancer screening |
title_sort | health action process approach for developing invitee endorsed interventions to increase mail‐out bowel cancer screening |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35107867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12346 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT myerslarry ahealthactionprocessapproachfordevelopinginviteeendorsedinterventionstoincreasemailoutbowelcancerscreening AT goodwinbelinda ahealthactionprocessapproachfordevelopinginviteeendorsedinterventionstoincreasemailoutbowelcancerscreening AT ralphnicholas ahealthactionprocessapproachfordevelopinginviteeendorsedinterventionstoincreasemailoutbowelcancerscreening AT marchsonja ahealthactionprocessapproachfordevelopinginviteeendorsedinterventionstoincreasemailoutbowelcancerscreening AT myerslarry healthactionprocessapproachfordevelopinginviteeendorsedinterventionstoincreasemailoutbowelcancerscreening AT goodwinbelinda healthactionprocessapproachfordevelopinginviteeendorsedinterventionstoincreasemailoutbowelcancerscreening AT ralphnicholas healthactionprocessapproachfordevelopinginviteeendorsedinterventionstoincreasemailoutbowelcancerscreening AT marchsonja healthactionprocessapproachfordevelopinginviteeendorsedinterventionstoincreasemailoutbowelcancerscreening |