Cargando…

Iterative static field map estimation for off‐resonance correction in non‐Cartesian susceptibility weighted imaging

PURPOSE: Patient‐induced inhomogeneities in the magnetic field cause distortions and blurring during acquisitions with long readouts such as in susceptibility‐weighted imaging (SWI). Most correction methods require collecting an additional [Formula: see text] field map to remove these artifacts. THE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daval‐Frérot, Guillaume, Massire, Aurélien, Mailhe, Boris, Nadar, Mariappan, Vignaud, Alexandre, Ciuciu, Philippe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35735217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29297
_version_ 1784804908456738816
author Daval‐Frérot, Guillaume
Massire, Aurélien
Mailhe, Boris
Nadar, Mariappan
Vignaud, Alexandre
Ciuciu, Philippe
author_facet Daval‐Frérot, Guillaume
Massire, Aurélien
Mailhe, Boris
Nadar, Mariappan
Vignaud, Alexandre
Ciuciu, Philippe
author_sort Daval‐Frérot, Guillaume
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Patient‐induced inhomogeneities in the magnetic field cause distortions and blurring during acquisitions with long readouts such as in susceptibility‐weighted imaging (SWI). Most correction methods require collecting an additional [Formula: see text] field map to remove these artifacts. THEORY: The static [Formula: see text] field map can be approximated with an acceptable error directly from a single echo acquisition in SWI. The main component of the observed phase is linearly related to [Formula: see text] and the echo time (TE), and the relative impact of non‐ [Formula: see text] terms becomes insignificant with [Formula: see text] >20 ms at 3 T for a well‐tuned system. METHODS: The main step is to combine and unfold the multi‐channel phase maps wrapped many times, and several competing algorithms are compared for this purpose. Four in vivo brain data sets collected using the recently proposed 3D spreading projection algorithm for rapid k‐space sampling (SPARKLING) readouts are used to assess the proposed method. RESULTS: The estimated 3D field maps generated with a 0.6 mm isotropic spatial resolution provide overall similar off‐resonance corrections compared to reference corrections based on an external [Formula: see text] acquisitions, and even improved for 2 of 4 individuals. Although a small estimation error is expected, no aftermath was observed in the proposed corrections, whereas degradations were observed in the references. CONCLUSION: A static [Formula: see text] field map estimation method was proposed to take advantage of acquisitions with long echo times, and outperformed the reference technique based on an external field map. The difference can be attributed to an inherent robustness to mismatches between volumes and external [Formula: see text] maps, and diverse other sources investigated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9545844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95458442022-10-14 Iterative static field map estimation for off‐resonance correction in non‐Cartesian susceptibility weighted imaging Daval‐Frérot, Guillaume Massire, Aurélien Mailhe, Boris Nadar, Mariappan Vignaud, Alexandre Ciuciu, Philippe Magn Reson Med Research Articles–Imaging Methodology PURPOSE: Patient‐induced inhomogeneities in the magnetic field cause distortions and blurring during acquisitions with long readouts such as in susceptibility‐weighted imaging (SWI). Most correction methods require collecting an additional [Formula: see text] field map to remove these artifacts. THEORY: The static [Formula: see text] field map can be approximated with an acceptable error directly from a single echo acquisition in SWI. The main component of the observed phase is linearly related to [Formula: see text] and the echo time (TE), and the relative impact of non‐ [Formula: see text] terms becomes insignificant with [Formula: see text] >20 ms at 3 T for a well‐tuned system. METHODS: The main step is to combine and unfold the multi‐channel phase maps wrapped many times, and several competing algorithms are compared for this purpose. Four in vivo brain data sets collected using the recently proposed 3D spreading projection algorithm for rapid k‐space sampling (SPARKLING) readouts are used to assess the proposed method. RESULTS: The estimated 3D field maps generated with a 0.6 mm isotropic spatial resolution provide overall similar off‐resonance corrections compared to reference corrections based on an external [Formula: see text] acquisitions, and even improved for 2 of 4 individuals. Although a small estimation error is expected, no aftermath was observed in the proposed corrections, whereas degradations were observed in the references. CONCLUSION: A static [Formula: see text] field map estimation method was proposed to take advantage of acquisitions with long echo times, and outperformed the reference technique based on an external field map. The difference can be attributed to an inherent robustness to mismatches between volumes and external [Formula: see text] maps, and diverse other sources investigated. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-23 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9545844/ /pubmed/35735217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29297 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles–Imaging Methodology
Daval‐Frérot, Guillaume
Massire, Aurélien
Mailhe, Boris
Nadar, Mariappan
Vignaud, Alexandre
Ciuciu, Philippe
Iterative static field map estimation for off‐resonance correction in non‐Cartesian susceptibility weighted imaging
title Iterative static field map estimation for off‐resonance correction in non‐Cartesian susceptibility weighted imaging
title_full Iterative static field map estimation for off‐resonance correction in non‐Cartesian susceptibility weighted imaging
title_fullStr Iterative static field map estimation for off‐resonance correction in non‐Cartesian susceptibility weighted imaging
title_full_unstemmed Iterative static field map estimation for off‐resonance correction in non‐Cartesian susceptibility weighted imaging
title_short Iterative static field map estimation for off‐resonance correction in non‐Cartesian susceptibility weighted imaging
title_sort iterative static field map estimation for off‐resonance correction in non‐cartesian susceptibility weighted imaging
topic Research Articles–Imaging Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35735217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29297
work_keys_str_mv AT davalfrerotguillaume iterativestaticfieldmapestimationforoffresonancecorrectioninnoncartesiansusceptibilityweightedimaging
AT massireaurelien iterativestaticfieldmapestimationforoffresonancecorrectioninnoncartesiansusceptibilityweightedimaging
AT mailheboris iterativestaticfieldmapestimationforoffresonancecorrectioninnoncartesiansusceptibilityweightedimaging
AT nadarmariappan iterativestaticfieldmapestimationforoffresonancecorrectioninnoncartesiansusceptibilityweightedimaging
AT vignaudalexandre iterativestaticfieldmapestimationforoffresonancecorrectioninnoncartesiansusceptibilityweightedimaging
AT ciuciuphilippe iterativestaticfieldmapestimationforoffresonancecorrectioninnoncartesiansusceptibilityweightedimaging