Cargando…

Patient preferences using telehealth during the COVID‐19 pandemic in four Victorian tertiary hospital services

BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic has had a major impact on healthcare services with many changes to telehealth care delivery. More information is needed about the patient perspective of telehealth in hospital services and the potential costs and benefits for patients. AIM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rasmussen, Bodil, Perry, Rachel, Hickey, Martha, Hua, Xinyang, Wong, Zee Wan, Guy, Lauren, Hitch, Danielle, Hiscock, Harriet, Dalziel, Kim, Winter, Naomi, Maier, Andrea B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35194927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imj.15726
_version_ 1784804928903970816
author Rasmussen, Bodil
Perry, Rachel
Hickey, Martha
Hua, Xinyang
Wong, Zee Wan
Guy, Lauren
Hitch, Danielle
Hiscock, Harriet
Dalziel, Kim
Winter, Naomi
Maier, Andrea B.
author_facet Rasmussen, Bodil
Perry, Rachel
Hickey, Martha
Hua, Xinyang
Wong, Zee Wan
Guy, Lauren
Hitch, Danielle
Hiscock, Harriet
Dalziel, Kim
Winter, Naomi
Maier, Andrea B.
author_sort Rasmussen, Bodil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic has had a major impact on healthcare services with many changes to telehealth care delivery. More information is needed about the patient perspective of telehealth in hospital services and the potential costs and benefits for patients. AIM: To measure patients' evaluation of telehealth, preferences for telehealth versus in‐person appointments, and potential cost savings by patient characteristics. METHODS: A cross‐sectional online survey (including patient and appointment characteristics, telehealth evaluation, preferences for care and costs) of adult patients using video telehealth in four metropolitan tertiary hospital services in Melbourne, Victoria. RESULTS: A total of 1045 patients (median age 44 years; interquartile range 29–59) participated with an overall response rate of 9.2%. For 98.7% patients, telehealth was convenient, 96.4% stated that it saved time, 95.9% found telehealth acceptable to receive care and 97.0% found that telehealth improved their access to care. Most (62.6%) preferred in‐person consultations, although 86.9% agreed that telehealth was equivalent to an in‐person consultation. Those in regional and rural areas were less likely to prefer in‐person consultations. Patients attending for medical reasons were less likely to prefer in‐person consultation compared with patients with surgical reasons. Patient preference to telehealth was independent of level of education, appointment type, self‐rated health status and socio economic status. Patients saved an average of A$120.9 (standard deviation A$93.0) per appointment, with greater cost savings for patients from low and middle socio economic areas and regional or rural areas. CONCLUSION: Telehealth video consultations were largely evaluated positively with most patients considering the service to be as good as in‐person. Understanding patient preference is critical to consider when implementing telehealth as mainstream across hospital health services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9545930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95459302022-10-14 Patient preferences using telehealth during the COVID‐19 pandemic in four Victorian tertiary hospital services Rasmussen, Bodil Perry, Rachel Hickey, Martha Hua, Xinyang Wong, Zee Wan Guy, Lauren Hitch, Danielle Hiscock, Harriet Dalziel, Kim Winter, Naomi Maier, Andrea B. Intern Med J Original Articles BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic has had a major impact on healthcare services with many changes to telehealth care delivery. More information is needed about the patient perspective of telehealth in hospital services and the potential costs and benefits for patients. AIM: To measure patients' evaluation of telehealth, preferences for telehealth versus in‐person appointments, and potential cost savings by patient characteristics. METHODS: A cross‐sectional online survey (including patient and appointment characteristics, telehealth evaluation, preferences for care and costs) of adult patients using video telehealth in four metropolitan tertiary hospital services in Melbourne, Victoria. RESULTS: A total of 1045 patients (median age 44 years; interquartile range 29–59) participated with an overall response rate of 9.2%. For 98.7% patients, telehealth was convenient, 96.4% stated that it saved time, 95.9% found telehealth acceptable to receive care and 97.0% found that telehealth improved their access to care. Most (62.6%) preferred in‐person consultations, although 86.9% agreed that telehealth was equivalent to an in‐person consultation. Those in regional and rural areas were less likely to prefer in‐person consultations. Patients attending for medical reasons were less likely to prefer in‐person consultation compared with patients with surgical reasons. Patient preference to telehealth was independent of level of education, appointment type, self‐rated health status and socio economic status. Patients saved an average of A$120.9 (standard deviation A$93.0) per appointment, with greater cost savings for patients from low and middle socio economic areas and regional or rural areas. CONCLUSION: Telehealth video consultations were largely evaluated positively with most patients considering the service to be as good as in‐person. Understanding patient preference is critical to consider when implementing telehealth as mainstream across hospital health services. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-04-07 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9545930/ /pubmed/35194927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imj.15726 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Internal Medicine Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Physicians. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Rasmussen, Bodil
Perry, Rachel
Hickey, Martha
Hua, Xinyang
Wong, Zee Wan
Guy, Lauren
Hitch, Danielle
Hiscock, Harriet
Dalziel, Kim
Winter, Naomi
Maier, Andrea B.
Patient preferences using telehealth during the COVID‐19 pandemic in four Victorian tertiary hospital services
title Patient preferences using telehealth during the COVID‐19 pandemic in four Victorian tertiary hospital services
title_full Patient preferences using telehealth during the COVID‐19 pandemic in four Victorian tertiary hospital services
title_fullStr Patient preferences using telehealth during the COVID‐19 pandemic in four Victorian tertiary hospital services
title_full_unstemmed Patient preferences using telehealth during the COVID‐19 pandemic in four Victorian tertiary hospital services
title_short Patient preferences using telehealth during the COVID‐19 pandemic in four Victorian tertiary hospital services
title_sort patient preferences using telehealth during the covid‐19 pandemic in four victorian tertiary hospital services
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35194927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imj.15726
work_keys_str_mv AT rasmussenbodil patientpreferencesusingtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinfourvictoriantertiaryhospitalservices
AT perryrachel patientpreferencesusingtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinfourvictoriantertiaryhospitalservices
AT hickeymartha patientpreferencesusingtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinfourvictoriantertiaryhospitalservices
AT huaxinyang patientpreferencesusingtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinfourvictoriantertiaryhospitalservices
AT wongzeewan patientpreferencesusingtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinfourvictoriantertiaryhospitalservices
AT guylauren patientpreferencesusingtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinfourvictoriantertiaryhospitalservices
AT hitchdanielle patientpreferencesusingtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinfourvictoriantertiaryhospitalservices
AT hiscockharriet patientpreferencesusingtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinfourvictoriantertiaryhospitalservices
AT dalzielkim patientpreferencesusingtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinfourvictoriantertiaryhospitalservices
AT winternaomi patientpreferencesusingtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinfourvictoriantertiaryhospitalservices
AT maierandreab patientpreferencesusingtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinfourvictoriantertiaryhospitalservices