Cargando…
Patient preferences using telehealth during the COVID‐19 pandemic in four Victorian tertiary hospital services
BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic has had a major impact on healthcare services with many changes to telehealth care delivery. More information is needed about the patient perspective of telehealth in hospital services and the potential costs and benefits for patients. AIM...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35194927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imj.15726 |
_version_ | 1784804928903970816 |
---|---|
author | Rasmussen, Bodil Perry, Rachel Hickey, Martha Hua, Xinyang Wong, Zee Wan Guy, Lauren Hitch, Danielle Hiscock, Harriet Dalziel, Kim Winter, Naomi Maier, Andrea B. |
author_facet | Rasmussen, Bodil Perry, Rachel Hickey, Martha Hua, Xinyang Wong, Zee Wan Guy, Lauren Hitch, Danielle Hiscock, Harriet Dalziel, Kim Winter, Naomi Maier, Andrea B. |
author_sort | Rasmussen, Bodil |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic has had a major impact on healthcare services with many changes to telehealth care delivery. More information is needed about the patient perspective of telehealth in hospital services and the potential costs and benefits for patients. AIM: To measure patients' evaluation of telehealth, preferences for telehealth versus in‐person appointments, and potential cost savings by patient characteristics. METHODS: A cross‐sectional online survey (including patient and appointment characteristics, telehealth evaluation, preferences for care and costs) of adult patients using video telehealth in four metropolitan tertiary hospital services in Melbourne, Victoria. RESULTS: A total of 1045 patients (median age 44 years; interquartile range 29–59) participated with an overall response rate of 9.2%. For 98.7% patients, telehealth was convenient, 96.4% stated that it saved time, 95.9% found telehealth acceptable to receive care and 97.0% found that telehealth improved their access to care. Most (62.6%) preferred in‐person consultations, although 86.9% agreed that telehealth was equivalent to an in‐person consultation. Those in regional and rural areas were less likely to prefer in‐person consultations. Patients attending for medical reasons were less likely to prefer in‐person consultation compared with patients with surgical reasons. Patient preference to telehealth was independent of level of education, appointment type, self‐rated health status and socio economic status. Patients saved an average of A$120.9 (standard deviation A$93.0) per appointment, with greater cost savings for patients from low and middle socio economic areas and regional or rural areas. CONCLUSION: Telehealth video consultations were largely evaluated positively with most patients considering the service to be as good as in‐person. Understanding patient preference is critical to consider when implementing telehealth as mainstream across hospital health services. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9545930 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95459302022-10-14 Patient preferences using telehealth during the COVID‐19 pandemic in four Victorian tertiary hospital services Rasmussen, Bodil Perry, Rachel Hickey, Martha Hua, Xinyang Wong, Zee Wan Guy, Lauren Hitch, Danielle Hiscock, Harriet Dalziel, Kim Winter, Naomi Maier, Andrea B. Intern Med J Original Articles BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic has had a major impact on healthcare services with many changes to telehealth care delivery. More information is needed about the patient perspective of telehealth in hospital services and the potential costs and benefits for patients. AIM: To measure patients' evaluation of telehealth, preferences for telehealth versus in‐person appointments, and potential cost savings by patient characteristics. METHODS: A cross‐sectional online survey (including patient and appointment characteristics, telehealth evaluation, preferences for care and costs) of adult patients using video telehealth in four metropolitan tertiary hospital services in Melbourne, Victoria. RESULTS: A total of 1045 patients (median age 44 years; interquartile range 29–59) participated with an overall response rate of 9.2%. For 98.7% patients, telehealth was convenient, 96.4% stated that it saved time, 95.9% found telehealth acceptable to receive care and 97.0% found that telehealth improved their access to care. Most (62.6%) preferred in‐person consultations, although 86.9% agreed that telehealth was equivalent to an in‐person consultation. Those in regional and rural areas were less likely to prefer in‐person consultations. Patients attending for medical reasons were less likely to prefer in‐person consultation compared with patients with surgical reasons. Patient preference to telehealth was independent of level of education, appointment type, self‐rated health status and socio economic status. Patients saved an average of A$120.9 (standard deviation A$93.0) per appointment, with greater cost savings for patients from low and middle socio economic areas and regional or rural areas. CONCLUSION: Telehealth video consultations were largely evaluated positively with most patients considering the service to be as good as in‐person. Understanding patient preference is critical to consider when implementing telehealth as mainstream across hospital health services. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-04-07 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9545930/ /pubmed/35194927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imj.15726 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Internal Medicine Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Physicians. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Rasmussen, Bodil Perry, Rachel Hickey, Martha Hua, Xinyang Wong, Zee Wan Guy, Lauren Hitch, Danielle Hiscock, Harriet Dalziel, Kim Winter, Naomi Maier, Andrea B. Patient preferences using telehealth during the COVID‐19 pandemic in four Victorian tertiary hospital services |
title | Patient preferences using telehealth during the COVID‐19 pandemic in four Victorian tertiary hospital services |
title_full | Patient preferences using telehealth during the COVID‐19 pandemic in four Victorian tertiary hospital services |
title_fullStr | Patient preferences using telehealth during the COVID‐19 pandemic in four Victorian tertiary hospital services |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient preferences using telehealth during the COVID‐19 pandemic in four Victorian tertiary hospital services |
title_short | Patient preferences using telehealth during the COVID‐19 pandemic in four Victorian tertiary hospital services |
title_sort | patient preferences using telehealth during the covid‐19 pandemic in four victorian tertiary hospital services |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35194927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imj.15726 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rasmussenbodil patientpreferencesusingtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinfourvictoriantertiaryhospitalservices AT perryrachel patientpreferencesusingtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinfourvictoriantertiaryhospitalservices AT hickeymartha patientpreferencesusingtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinfourvictoriantertiaryhospitalservices AT huaxinyang patientpreferencesusingtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinfourvictoriantertiaryhospitalservices AT wongzeewan patientpreferencesusingtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinfourvictoriantertiaryhospitalservices AT guylauren patientpreferencesusingtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinfourvictoriantertiaryhospitalservices AT hitchdanielle patientpreferencesusingtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinfourvictoriantertiaryhospitalservices AT hiscockharriet patientpreferencesusingtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinfourvictoriantertiaryhospitalservices AT dalzielkim patientpreferencesusingtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinfourvictoriantertiaryhospitalservices AT winternaomi patientpreferencesusingtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinfourvictoriantertiaryhospitalservices AT maierandreab patientpreferencesusingtelehealthduringthecovid19pandemicinfourvictoriantertiaryhospitalservices |