Cargando…

Does the body talk to the body? The relationship between different body representations while observing others’ body parts

The way human bodies are represented is central in everyday activities. The cognitive system must combine internal, visceral, and somatosensory, signals to external, visually driven information generated from the spatial placement of others’ bodies and the own body in the space. However, how differe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tessari, Alessia, Ottoboni, Giovanni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35181883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12558
_version_ 1784804941264584704
author Tessari, Alessia
Ottoboni, Giovanni
author_facet Tessari, Alessia
Ottoboni, Giovanni
author_sort Tessari, Alessia
collection PubMed
description The way human bodies are represented is central in everyday activities. The cognitive system must combine internal, visceral, and somatosensory, signals to external, visually driven information generated from the spatial placement of others’ bodies and the own body in the space. However, how different body representations covertly interact among them when observing human body parts is still unclear. Therefore, we investigated the implicit processing of body parts by manipulating either the body part stimuli’ posture (conditions a and b) or the participants’ response body posture (conditions c, d, and e) in healthy participants (N = 70) using a spatial compatibility task called Sidedness task. The task requires participants to judge the colour of a circle superimposed on a task‐irrelevant body part picture. Responses are facilitated when the spatial side of the responding hand corresponds to the spatial code generated by the hand stimulus's position with respect to a body of reference. Results showed that the observation of the task‐irrelevant body parts oriented participants’ attention and facilitated responses that were spatial compatible with the spatial position such body parts have within a configural representation of the body structure (i.e., Body Structural Representation) in all the five experimental conditions. Notably, the body part stimuli were mentally attached to the body according to the most comfortable and less awkward postures, following the anatomo‐physiological constraints. Moreover, the pattern of the results was not influenced by manipulating the participants’ response postures, suggesting that the automatic and implicit coding of the body part stimuli does not rely on proprioceptive information about one's body (i.e., Body Schema). We propose that the human body's morphometry knowledge is enriched by biomechanical and anatomo‐physiological information about the real body movement possibilities. Moreover, we discuss the importance of the automatic orienting of attention based on the sidedness within the context of imitational learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9545991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95459912022-10-14 Does the body talk to the body? The relationship between different body representations while observing others’ body parts Tessari, Alessia Ottoboni, Giovanni Br J Psychol Original Articles The way human bodies are represented is central in everyday activities. The cognitive system must combine internal, visceral, and somatosensory, signals to external, visually driven information generated from the spatial placement of others’ bodies and the own body in the space. However, how different body representations covertly interact among them when observing human body parts is still unclear. Therefore, we investigated the implicit processing of body parts by manipulating either the body part stimuli’ posture (conditions a and b) or the participants’ response body posture (conditions c, d, and e) in healthy participants (N = 70) using a spatial compatibility task called Sidedness task. The task requires participants to judge the colour of a circle superimposed on a task‐irrelevant body part picture. Responses are facilitated when the spatial side of the responding hand corresponds to the spatial code generated by the hand stimulus's position with respect to a body of reference. Results showed that the observation of the task‐irrelevant body parts oriented participants’ attention and facilitated responses that were spatial compatible with the spatial position such body parts have within a configural representation of the body structure (i.e., Body Structural Representation) in all the five experimental conditions. Notably, the body part stimuli were mentally attached to the body according to the most comfortable and less awkward postures, following the anatomo‐physiological constraints. Moreover, the pattern of the results was not influenced by manipulating the participants’ response postures, suggesting that the automatic and implicit coding of the body part stimuli does not rely on proprioceptive information about one's body (i.e., Body Schema). We propose that the human body's morphometry knowledge is enriched by biomechanical and anatomo‐physiological information about the real body movement possibilities. Moreover, we discuss the importance of the automatic orienting of attention based on the sidedness within the context of imitational learning. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-18 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9545991/ /pubmed/35181883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12558 Text en © 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The British Psychological Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Tessari, Alessia
Ottoboni, Giovanni
Does the body talk to the body? The relationship between different body representations while observing others’ body parts
title Does the body talk to the body? The relationship between different body representations while observing others’ body parts
title_full Does the body talk to the body? The relationship between different body representations while observing others’ body parts
title_fullStr Does the body talk to the body? The relationship between different body representations while observing others’ body parts
title_full_unstemmed Does the body talk to the body? The relationship between different body representations while observing others’ body parts
title_short Does the body talk to the body? The relationship between different body representations while observing others’ body parts
title_sort does the body talk to the body? the relationship between different body representations while observing others’ body parts
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35181883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12558
work_keys_str_mv AT tessarialessia doesthebodytalktothebodytherelationshipbetweendifferentbodyrepresentationswhileobservingothersbodyparts
AT ottobonigiovanni doesthebodytalktothebodytherelationshipbetweendifferentbodyrepresentationswhileobservingothersbodyparts