Cargando…

Oral sulfate solution benefits polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES: Although oral sulfate solution (OSS) has been revealed to be not only safe and efficacious but also noninferior to polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid (PEG + ASC), it is unclear whether OSS can ultimately increase the polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR). We per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Cheng, Shi, Mengyang, Liao, Zhongli, Chen, Weiqing, Wu, Yongzhong, Tian, Xu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35294782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/den.14299
_version_ 1784804942327840768
author Chen, Cheng
Shi, Mengyang
Liao, Zhongli
Chen, Weiqing
Wu, Yongzhong
Tian, Xu
author_facet Chen, Cheng
Shi, Mengyang
Liao, Zhongli
Chen, Weiqing
Wu, Yongzhong
Tian, Xu
author_sort Chen, Cheng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Although oral sulfate solution (OSS) has been revealed to be not only safe and efficacious but also noninferior to polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid (PEG + ASC), it is unclear whether OSS can ultimately increase the polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR). We performed this meta‐analysis to estimate the effect of OSS on PDR and ADR during colonoscopy. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the comparative effect of OSS versus PEG + ASC on the PDR and ADR during colonoscopy. Cecal intubation time (CIT), cecal intubation rate (CIR), and bowel preparation score were also evaluated. Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.3.0 was used to perform statistical analysis. RESULTS: Eight RCTs involving 2059 patients fulfilled the selection criteria. Meta‐analysis suggested that OSS significantly increased the PDR (47.34% vs. 40.14%, risk ratio [RR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03−1.24, P = 0.01) and ADR (44.60% vs. 38.14%, RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.03−1.33, P = 0.01) during colonoscopy. Subgroup analysis showed that the beneficial effects of OSS on PDR and ADR were consistent among patients with mean age >55 years and with body mass index <25 kg/m(2) receiving outpatient colonoscopy, morning colonoscopy, and the 2‐L bowel preparation protocol. Meanwhile, patients receiving OSS had a beneficial bowel preparation score. CONCLUSION: Compared with polyethylene glycol‐based regimens, the OSS bowel preparation regimen significantly increased the PDR and ADR in patients undergoing colonoscopy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9545996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95459962022-10-14 Oral sulfate solution benefits polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials Chen, Cheng Shi, Mengyang Liao, Zhongli Chen, Weiqing Wu, Yongzhong Tian, Xu Dig Endosc Reviews OBJECTIVES: Although oral sulfate solution (OSS) has been revealed to be not only safe and efficacious but also noninferior to polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid (PEG + ASC), it is unclear whether OSS can ultimately increase the polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR). We performed this meta‐analysis to estimate the effect of OSS on PDR and ADR during colonoscopy. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the comparative effect of OSS versus PEG + ASC on the PDR and ADR during colonoscopy. Cecal intubation time (CIT), cecal intubation rate (CIR), and bowel preparation score were also evaluated. Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.3.0 was used to perform statistical analysis. RESULTS: Eight RCTs involving 2059 patients fulfilled the selection criteria. Meta‐analysis suggested that OSS significantly increased the PDR (47.34% vs. 40.14%, risk ratio [RR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03−1.24, P = 0.01) and ADR (44.60% vs. 38.14%, RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.03−1.33, P = 0.01) during colonoscopy. Subgroup analysis showed that the beneficial effects of OSS on PDR and ADR were consistent among patients with mean age >55 years and with body mass index <25 kg/m(2) receiving outpatient colonoscopy, morning colonoscopy, and the 2‐L bowel preparation protocol. Meanwhile, patients receiving OSS had a beneficial bowel preparation score. CONCLUSION: Compared with polyethylene glycol‐based regimens, the OSS bowel preparation regimen significantly increased the PDR and ADR in patients undergoing colonoscopy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-06 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9545996/ /pubmed/35294782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/den.14299 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Digestive Endoscopy published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Chen, Cheng
Shi, Mengyang
Liao, Zhongli
Chen, Weiqing
Wu, Yongzhong
Tian, Xu
Oral sulfate solution benefits polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Oral sulfate solution benefits polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Oral sulfate solution benefits polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Oral sulfate solution benefits polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Oral sulfate solution benefits polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Oral sulfate solution benefits polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort oral sulfate solution benefits polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscopy: meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35294782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/den.14299
work_keys_str_mv AT chencheng oralsulfatesolutionbenefitspolypandadenomadetectionduringcolonoscopymetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT shimengyang oralsulfatesolutionbenefitspolypandadenomadetectionduringcolonoscopymetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liaozhongli oralsulfatesolutionbenefitspolypandadenomadetectionduringcolonoscopymetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chenweiqing oralsulfatesolutionbenefitspolypandadenomadetectionduringcolonoscopymetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wuyongzhong oralsulfatesolutionbenefitspolypandadenomadetectionduringcolonoscopymetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT tianxu oralsulfatesolutionbenefitspolypandadenomadetectionduringcolonoscopymetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials