Cargando…

Direct evidence supporting Darwin's hypothesis of cross‐pollination promoted by sex organ reciprocity

The floral phenotype plays a main role in the attraction and fit of pollinators. Both perianth traits and the positioning of sex organs can be subjected to natural selection and determine nonrandom mating patterns in populations. In stylar‐polymorphic species, the Darwinian hypothesis predicts incre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simón‐Porcar, Violeta I., Muñoz‐Pajares, A. Jesús, de Castro, Alejandra, Arroyo, Juan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35596603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.18266
_version_ 1784804944593813504
author Simón‐Porcar, Violeta I.
Muñoz‐Pajares, A. Jesús
de Castro, Alejandra
Arroyo, Juan
author_facet Simón‐Porcar, Violeta I.
Muñoz‐Pajares, A. Jesús
de Castro, Alejandra
Arroyo, Juan
author_sort Simón‐Porcar, Violeta I.
collection PubMed
description The floral phenotype plays a main role in the attraction and fit of pollinators. Both perianth traits and the positioning of sex organs can be subjected to natural selection and determine nonrandom mating patterns in populations. In stylar‐polymorphic species, the Darwinian hypothesis predicts increased mating success between individuals with sex organs at equivalent heights (i.e. with higher reciprocity). We used paternity analyses in experimental populations of a stylar‐dimorphic species. By comparing the observed mating patterns with those expected under random mating, we tested the effects of sex organ reciprocity and perianth traits on mating success. We also analysed phenotypic selection on perianth traits through female and male functions. The (dis)similarity of parental perianth traits had no direct effects on the mating patterns. Sex organ reciprocity had a positive effect on mating success. Narrow floral tubes increased this effect in upper sex organs. Perianth traits showed little signs of phenotypic selection. Female and absolute fitness measures resulted in different patterns of phenotypic selection. We provide precise empirical evidence of the Darwinian hypothesis about the functioning of stylar polymorphisms, demonstrating that mating patterns are determined by sex organ reciprocity and only those perianth traits which are critical to pollinator fit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9546006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95460062022-10-14 Direct evidence supporting Darwin's hypothesis of cross‐pollination promoted by sex organ reciprocity Simón‐Porcar, Violeta I. Muñoz‐Pajares, A. Jesús de Castro, Alejandra Arroyo, Juan New Phytol Research The floral phenotype plays a main role in the attraction and fit of pollinators. Both perianth traits and the positioning of sex organs can be subjected to natural selection and determine nonrandom mating patterns in populations. In stylar‐polymorphic species, the Darwinian hypothesis predicts increased mating success between individuals with sex organs at equivalent heights (i.e. with higher reciprocity). We used paternity analyses in experimental populations of a stylar‐dimorphic species. By comparing the observed mating patterns with those expected under random mating, we tested the effects of sex organ reciprocity and perianth traits on mating success. We also analysed phenotypic selection on perianth traits through female and male functions. The (dis)similarity of parental perianth traits had no direct effects on the mating patterns. Sex organ reciprocity had a positive effect on mating success. Narrow floral tubes increased this effect in upper sex organs. Perianth traits showed little signs of phenotypic selection. Female and absolute fitness measures resulted in different patterns of phenotypic selection. We provide precise empirical evidence of the Darwinian hypothesis about the functioning of stylar polymorphisms, demonstrating that mating patterns are determined by sex organ reciprocity and only those perianth traits which are critical to pollinator fit. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-23 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9546006/ /pubmed/35596603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.18266 Text en © 2022 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2022 New Phytologist Foundation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research
Simón‐Porcar, Violeta I.
Muñoz‐Pajares, A. Jesús
de Castro, Alejandra
Arroyo, Juan
Direct evidence supporting Darwin's hypothesis of cross‐pollination promoted by sex organ reciprocity
title Direct evidence supporting Darwin's hypothesis of cross‐pollination promoted by sex organ reciprocity
title_full Direct evidence supporting Darwin's hypothesis of cross‐pollination promoted by sex organ reciprocity
title_fullStr Direct evidence supporting Darwin's hypothesis of cross‐pollination promoted by sex organ reciprocity
title_full_unstemmed Direct evidence supporting Darwin's hypothesis of cross‐pollination promoted by sex organ reciprocity
title_short Direct evidence supporting Darwin's hypothesis of cross‐pollination promoted by sex organ reciprocity
title_sort direct evidence supporting darwin's hypothesis of cross‐pollination promoted by sex organ reciprocity
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35596603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.18266
work_keys_str_mv AT simonporcarvioletai directevidencesupportingdarwinshypothesisofcrosspollinationpromotedbysexorganreciprocity
AT munozpajaresajesus directevidencesupportingdarwinshypothesisofcrosspollinationpromotedbysexorganreciprocity
AT decastroalejandra directevidencesupportingdarwinshypothesisofcrosspollinationpromotedbysexorganreciprocity
AT arroyojuan directevidencesupportingdarwinshypothesisofcrosspollinationpromotedbysexorganreciprocity