Cargando…

Changes in quantitative sensory testing and patient perspectives following spinal cord stimulation for persistent spinal pain syndrome: An observational study with long‐term follow‐up

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) can impact sensory, pain and tolerance thresholds in various ways, which can be accessed via quantitative sensory testing (QST). The objectives of this study were to (1) assess the subjective sensory responses using QST in patients following SCS therapy for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Plantaz, Yannick J. G. M., van Dongen, Robert T. M., Witkam, Richard L., Vissers, Kris C. P., Timmerman, Hans
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35638567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1984
_version_ 1784804950408167424
author Plantaz, Yannick J. G. M.
van Dongen, Robert T. M.
Witkam, Richard L.
Vissers, Kris C. P.
Timmerman, Hans
author_facet Plantaz, Yannick J. G. M.
van Dongen, Robert T. M.
Witkam, Richard L.
Vissers, Kris C. P.
Timmerman, Hans
author_sort Plantaz, Yannick J. G. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) can impact sensory, pain and tolerance thresholds in various ways, which can be accessed via quantitative sensory testing (QST). The objectives of this study were to (1) assess the subjective sensory responses using QST in patients following SCS therapy for PSPS and (2) to get a clinical impression of the results of SCS during an interview of these patients with PSPS and SCS during long term follow‐up. METHODS: Forty patients with PSPS who received SCS treatment underwent QST via electrical and mechanical pressure stimuli. QST was performed at four different moments (1) pre‐implantation SCS, (2) two weeks postoperatively, (3) three months after permanent SCS implantation and (4) six months after permanent SCS implantation. Patients’ perspectives on pain, use of drugs and quality of life were assessed via semi‐structured interviews during a follow‐up between 5 and 11 years. RESULTS: We found statistical significant differences in the changes of sensory, pain and tolerance thresholds. A decrease in pain complaints and analgesics use were reported by the patients during follow‐up. The quality of life in patients increased from three to eight (NRS 0 [worst QoL imaginable] ‐10 [best QoL imaginable]) after receiving SCS. CONCLUSIONS: The increased thresholds on areas without pain or being covered by the SCS induced paresthesias may indicate that there are central changes contributing to these deviations in thresholds. The overall QoL in patients improved greatly after receiving SCS. SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides an overview of the effect of SCS on sensory, pain and tolerance thresholds in patients with PSPS throughout the SCS treatment process. In addition, this study presents data from 40 patients with PSPS treated with SCS, analysing several long‐term patient‐reported outcome measures. The results serve to give more insight into the mechanism of SCS and document SCS as a possible treatment for PSPS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9546026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95460262022-10-14 Changes in quantitative sensory testing and patient perspectives following spinal cord stimulation for persistent spinal pain syndrome: An observational study with long‐term follow‐up Plantaz, Yannick J. G. M. van Dongen, Robert T. M. Witkam, Richard L. Vissers, Kris C. P. Timmerman, Hans Eur J Pain Original Articles BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) can impact sensory, pain and tolerance thresholds in various ways, which can be accessed via quantitative sensory testing (QST). The objectives of this study were to (1) assess the subjective sensory responses using QST in patients following SCS therapy for PSPS and (2) to get a clinical impression of the results of SCS during an interview of these patients with PSPS and SCS during long term follow‐up. METHODS: Forty patients with PSPS who received SCS treatment underwent QST via electrical and mechanical pressure stimuli. QST was performed at four different moments (1) pre‐implantation SCS, (2) two weeks postoperatively, (3) three months after permanent SCS implantation and (4) six months after permanent SCS implantation. Patients’ perspectives on pain, use of drugs and quality of life were assessed via semi‐structured interviews during a follow‐up between 5 and 11 years. RESULTS: We found statistical significant differences in the changes of sensory, pain and tolerance thresholds. A decrease in pain complaints and analgesics use were reported by the patients during follow‐up. The quality of life in patients increased from three to eight (NRS 0 [worst QoL imaginable] ‐10 [best QoL imaginable]) after receiving SCS. CONCLUSIONS: The increased thresholds on areas without pain or being covered by the SCS induced paresthesias may indicate that there are central changes contributing to these deviations in thresholds. The overall QoL in patients improved greatly after receiving SCS. SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides an overview of the effect of SCS on sensory, pain and tolerance thresholds in patients with PSPS throughout the SCS treatment process. In addition, this study presents data from 40 patients with PSPS treated with SCS, analysing several long‐term patient‐reported outcome measures. The results serve to give more insight into the mechanism of SCS and document SCS as a possible treatment for PSPS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-13 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9546026/ /pubmed/35638567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1984 Text en © 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation ‐ EFIC ®. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Plantaz, Yannick J. G. M.
van Dongen, Robert T. M.
Witkam, Richard L.
Vissers, Kris C. P.
Timmerman, Hans
Changes in quantitative sensory testing and patient perspectives following spinal cord stimulation for persistent spinal pain syndrome: An observational study with long‐term follow‐up
title Changes in quantitative sensory testing and patient perspectives following spinal cord stimulation for persistent spinal pain syndrome: An observational study with long‐term follow‐up
title_full Changes in quantitative sensory testing and patient perspectives following spinal cord stimulation for persistent spinal pain syndrome: An observational study with long‐term follow‐up
title_fullStr Changes in quantitative sensory testing and patient perspectives following spinal cord stimulation for persistent spinal pain syndrome: An observational study with long‐term follow‐up
title_full_unstemmed Changes in quantitative sensory testing and patient perspectives following spinal cord stimulation for persistent spinal pain syndrome: An observational study with long‐term follow‐up
title_short Changes in quantitative sensory testing and patient perspectives following spinal cord stimulation for persistent spinal pain syndrome: An observational study with long‐term follow‐up
title_sort changes in quantitative sensory testing and patient perspectives following spinal cord stimulation for persistent spinal pain syndrome: an observational study with long‐term follow‐up
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35638567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1984
work_keys_str_mv AT plantazyannickjgm changesinquantitativesensorytestingandpatientperspectivesfollowingspinalcordstimulationforpersistentspinalpainsyndromeanobservationalstudywithlongtermfollowup
AT vandongenroberttm changesinquantitativesensorytestingandpatientperspectivesfollowingspinalcordstimulationforpersistentspinalpainsyndromeanobservationalstudywithlongtermfollowup
AT witkamrichardl changesinquantitativesensorytestingandpatientperspectivesfollowingspinalcordstimulationforpersistentspinalpainsyndromeanobservationalstudywithlongtermfollowup
AT visserskriscp changesinquantitativesensorytestingandpatientperspectivesfollowingspinalcordstimulationforpersistentspinalpainsyndromeanobservationalstudywithlongtermfollowup
AT timmermanhans changesinquantitativesensorytestingandpatientperspectivesfollowingspinalcordstimulationforpersistentspinalpainsyndromeanobservationalstudywithlongtermfollowup