Cargando…

Life cycle assessment of animal‐based foods and plant‐based protein‐rich alternatives: a socio‐economic perspective

BACKGROUND: Extensive research shows that replacing animal protein with plant‐based protein in the diet would strongly alleviate the environmental impact of the food system. However, much less attention has been given to the socio‐economic considerations of dietary transitions. This study analyses t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Varela‐Ortega, Consuelo, Blanco‐Gutiérrez, Irene, Manners, Rhys, Detzel, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34791663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11655
_version_ 1784804960923287552
author Varela‐Ortega, Consuelo
Blanco‐Gutiérrez, Irene
Manners, Rhys
Detzel, Andreas
author_facet Varela‐Ortega, Consuelo
Blanco‐Gutiérrez, Irene
Manners, Rhys
Detzel, Andreas
author_sort Varela‐Ortega, Consuelo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Extensive research shows that replacing animal protein with plant‐based protein in the diet would strongly alleviate the environmental impact of the food system. However, much less attention has been given to the socio‐economic considerations of dietary transitions. This study analyses the socio‐economic performance of innovative legume‐based food prototypes, developed in the Protein2Food research project, and conventional animal‐based products (chicken meat and dairy milk). We implement a social life cycle assessment (sLCA) to quantify and compare their potential socio‐economic impacts along the entire life cycle. RESULTS: Findings from this analysis show that legume‐based prototypes and their respective animal‐based counterparts have, overall, a comparable socio‐economic performance. Looking at the disaggregated life cycle stages, socio‐economic hotspots (points of most negative impacts) were mainly identified at the production stage in legume‐based products. Farm‐level net margin and profitability are low when compared with their animal equivalents. However, at the processing stage, there are socio‐economic gains for plant‐based products regarding lower unemployment rates. Finally, at the consumption stage, there are mixed results. Plant‐based products show worse protein affordability but better nutritional contents (lower saturated fat and cholesterol) than their animal counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: To improve socio‐economic performance of legume‐based foods, greater emphasis should be placed upon developing improved processing technologies and supply chains. This would broaden the supply of sustainable protein‐rich food options and make these products more economically attractive. The research illustrates that policies should be targeted to the different stages of the food value chain to optimize the development of innovative plant‐based foods. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9546073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95460732022-10-14 Life cycle assessment of animal‐based foods and plant‐based protein‐rich alternatives: a socio‐economic perspective Varela‐Ortega, Consuelo Blanco‐Gutiérrez, Irene Manners, Rhys Detzel, Andreas J Sci Food Agric In Focus ARTICLES ‐ PROTEIN2FOOD: PIONEERING PLANT PROTEIN FOR FUTURE GENERATION BACKGROUND: Extensive research shows that replacing animal protein with plant‐based protein in the diet would strongly alleviate the environmental impact of the food system. However, much less attention has been given to the socio‐economic considerations of dietary transitions. This study analyses the socio‐economic performance of innovative legume‐based food prototypes, developed in the Protein2Food research project, and conventional animal‐based products (chicken meat and dairy milk). We implement a social life cycle assessment (sLCA) to quantify and compare their potential socio‐economic impacts along the entire life cycle. RESULTS: Findings from this analysis show that legume‐based prototypes and their respective animal‐based counterparts have, overall, a comparable socio‐economic performance. Looking at the disaggregated life cycle stages, socio‐economic hotspots (points of most negative impacts) were mainly identified at the production stage in legume‐based products. Farm‐level net margin and profitability are low when compared with their animal equivalents. However, at the processing stage, there are socio‐economic gains for plant‐based products regarding lower unemployment rates. Finally, at the consumption stage, there are mixed results. Plant‐based products show worse protein affordability but better nutritional contents (lower saturated fat and cholesterol) than their animal counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: To improve socio‐economic performance of legume‐based foods, greater emphasis should be placed upon developing improved processing technologies and supply chains. This would broaden the supply of sustainable protein‐rich food options and make these products more economically attractive. The research illustrates that policies should be targeted to the different stages of the food value chain to optimize the development of innovative plant‐based foods. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2021-12-03 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9546073/ /pubmed/34791663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11655 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle In Focus ARTICLES ‐ PROTEIN2FOOD: PIONEERING PLANT PROTEIN FOR FUTURE GENERATION
Varela‐Ortega, Consuelo
Blanco‐Gutiérrez, Irene
Manners, Rhys
Detzel, Andreas
Life cycle assessment of animal‐based foods and plant‐based protein‐rich alternatives: a socio‐economic perspective
title Life cycle assessment of animal‐based foods and plant‐based protein‐rich alternatives: a socio‐economic perspective
title_full Life cycle assessment of animal‐based foods and plant‐based protein‐rich alternatives: a socio‐economic perspective
title_fullStr Life cycle assessment of animal‐based foods and plant‐based protein‐rich alternatives: a socio‐economic perspective
title_full_unstemmed Life cycle assessment of animal‐based foods and plant‐based protein‐rich alternatives: a socio‐economic perspective
title_short Life cycle assessment of animal‐based foods and plant‐based protein‐rich alternatives: a socio‐economic perspective
title_sort life cycle assessment of animal‐based foods and plant‐based protein‐rich alternatives: a socio‐economic perspective
topic In Focus ARTICLES ‐ PROTEIN2FOOD: PIONEERING PLANT PROTEIN FOR FUTURE GENERATION
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34791663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11655
work_keys_str_mv AT varelaortegaconsuelo lifecycleassessmentofanimalbasedfoodsandplantbasedproteinrichalternativesasocioeconomicperspective
AT blancogutierrezirene lifecycleassessmentofanimalbasedfoodsandplantbasedproteinrichalternativesasocioeconomicperspective
AT mannersrhys lifecycleassessmentofanimalbasedfoodsandplantbasedproteinrichalternativesasocioeconomicperspective
AT detzelandreas lifecycleassessmentofanimalbasedfoodsandplantbasedproteinrichalternativesasocioeconomicperspective