Cargando…
Life cycle assessment of animal‐based foods and plant‐based protein‐rich alternatives: a socio‐economic perspective
BACKGROUND: Extensive research shows that replacing animal protein with plant‐based protein in the diet would strongly alleviate the environmental impact of the food system. However, much less attention has been given to the socio‐economic considerations of dietary transitions. This study analyses t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34791663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11655 |
_version_ | 1784804960923287552 |
---|---|
author | Varela‐Ortega, Consuelo Blanco‐Gutiérrez, Irene Manners, Rhys Detzel, Andreas |
author_facet | Varela‐Ortega, Consuelo Blanco‐Gutiérrez, Irene Manners, Rhys Detzel, Andreas |
author_sort | Varela‐Ortega, Consuelo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Extensive research shows that replacing animal protein with plant‐based protein in the diet would strongly alleviate the environmental impact of the food system. However, much less attention has been given to the socio‐economic considerations of dietary transitions. This study analyses the socio‐economic performance of innovative legume‐based food prototypes, developed in the Protein2Food research project, and conventional animal‐based products (chicken meat and dairy milk). We implement a social life cycle assessment (sLCA) to quantify and compare their potential socio‐economic impacts along the entire life cycle. RESULTS: Findings from this analysis show that legume‐based prototypes and their respective animal‐based counterparts have, overall, a comparable socio‐economic performance. Looking at the disaggregated life cycle stages, socio‐economic hotspots (points of most negative impacts) were mainly identified at the production stage in legume‐based products. Farm‐level net margin and profitability are low when compared with their animal equivalents. However, at the processing stage, there are socio‐economic gains for plant‐based products regarding lower unemployment rates. Finally, at the consumption stage, there are mixed results. Plant‐based products show worse protein affordability but better nutritional contents (lower saturated fat and cholesterol) than their animal counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: To improve socio‐economic performance of legume‐based foods, greater emphasis should be placed upon developing improved processing technologies and supply chains. This would broaden the supply of sustainable protein‐rich food options and make these products more economically attractive. The research illustrates that policies should be targeted to the different stages of the food value chain to optimize the development of innovative plant‐based foods. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9546073 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95460732022-10-14 Life cycle assessment of animal‐based foods and plant‐based protein‐rich alternatives: a socio‐economic perspective Varela‐Ortega, Consuelo Blanco‐Gutiérrez, Irene Manners, Rhys Detzel, Andreas J Sci Food Agric In Focus ARTICLES ‐ PROTEIN2FOOD: PIONEERING PLANT PROTEIN FOR FUTURE GENERATION BACKGROUND: Extensive research shows that replacing animal protein with plant‐based protein in the diet would strongly alleviate the environmental impact of the food system. However, much less attention has been given to the socio‐economic considerations of dietary transitions. This study analyses the socio‐economic performance of innovative legume‐based food prototypes, developed in the Protein2Food research project, and conventional animal‐based products (chicken meat and dairy milk). We implement a social life cycle assessment (sLCA) to quantify and compare their potential socio‐economic impacts along the entire life cycle. RESULTS: Findings from this analysis show that legume‐based prototypes and their respective animal‐based counterparts have, overall, a comparable socio‐economic performance. Looking at the disaggregated life cycle stages, socio‐economic hotspots (points of most negative impacts) were mainly identified at the production stage in legume‐based products. Farm‐level net margin and profitability are low when compared with their animal equivalents. However, at the processing stage, there are socio‐economic gains for plant‐based products regarding lower unemployment rates. Finally, at the consumption stage, there are mixed results. Plant‐based products show worse protein affordability but better nutritional contents (lower saturated fat and cholesterol) than their animal counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: To improve socio‐economic performance of legume‐based foods, greater emphasis should be placed upon developing improved processing technologies and supply chains. This would broaden the supply of sustainable protein‐rich food options and make these products more economically attractive. The research illustrates that policies should be targeted to the different stages of the food value chain to optimize the development of innovative plant‐based foods. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2021-12-03 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9546073/ /pubmed/34791663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11655 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | In Focus ARTICLES ‐ PROTEIN2FOOD: PIONEERING PLANT PROTEIN FOR FUTURE GENERATION Varela‐Ortega, Consuelo Blanco‐Gutiérrez, Irene Manners, Rhys Detzel, Andreas Life cycle assessment of animal‐based foods and plant‐based protein‐rich alternatives: a socio‐economic perspective |
title | Life cycle assessment of animal‐based foods and plant‐based protein‐rich alternatives: a socio‐economic perspective |
title_full | Life cycle assessment of animal‐based foods and plant‐based protein‐rich alternatives: a socio‐economic perspective |
title_fullStr | Life cycle assessment of animal‐based foods and plant‐based protein‐rich alternatives: a socio‐economic perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Life cycle assessment of animal‐based foods and plant‐based protein‐rich alternatives: a socio‐economic perspective |
title_short | Life cycle assessment of animal‐based foods and plant‐based protein‐rich alternatives: a socio‐economic perspective |
title_sort | life cycle assessment of animal‐based foods and plant‐based protein‐rich alternatives: a socio‐economic perspective |
topic | In Focus ARTICLES ‐ PROTEIN2FOOD: PIONEERING PLANT PROTEIN FOR FUTURE GENERATION |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34791663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11655 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT varelaortegaconsuelo lifecycleassessmentofanimalbasedfoodsandplantbasedproteinrichalternativesasocioeconomicperspective AT blancogutierrezirene lifecycleassessmentofanimalbasedfoodsandplantbasedproteinrichalternativesasocioeconomicperspective AT mannersrhys lifecycleassessmentofanimalbasedfoodsandplantbasedproteinrichalternativesasocioeconomicperspective AT detzelandreas lifecycleassessmentofanimalbasedfoodsandplantbasedproteinrichalternativesasocioeconomicperspective |