Cargando…
Examining patient and professional perspectives in the UK for gene therapy in haemophilia
INTRODUCTION: With the development of gene therapy for people with haemophilia (PWH), it is important to understand how people impacted by haemophilia (PIH) and clinicians prioritise haemophilia treatment attributes to support informed treatment decisions. OBJECTIVE: To examine the treatment attribu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35438818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hae.14572 |
_version_ | 1784804963793240064 |
---|---|
author | Woollacott, Ione Morgan, George Chowdary, Pratima O'Hara, Jamie Franks, Bethany van Overbeeke, Eline Dunn, Nicola Michelsen, Sissel Huys, Isabelle Martin, Antony Cawson, Matthew Brownrigg, Jack Winburn, Ian Thomson, Jim |
author_facet | Woollacott, Ione Morgan, George Chowdary, Pratima O'Hara, Jamie Franks, Bethany van Overbeeke, Eline Dunn, Nicola Michelsen, Sissel Huys, Isabelle Martin, Antony Cawson, Matthew Brownrigg, Jack Winburn, Ian Thomson, Jim |
author_sort | Woollacott, Ione |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: With the development of gene therapy for people with haemophilia (PWH), it is important to understand how people impacted by haemophilia (PIH) and clinicians prioritise haemophilia treatment attributes to support informed treatment decisions. OBJECTIVE: To examine the treatment attribute preferences of PIH and clinical experts in the United Kingdom (UK) and to develop a profile of gene therapy characteristics fit for use in future discrete choice experiments (DCEs). METHODS: Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with PIH (n = 14) and clinical experts (n = 6) who ranked pre‐defined treatment attributes by importance. Framework analysis was conducted to identify key themes and treatment attributes; points were allocated based on the rankings. Synthesis of results by a multidisciplinary group informed development of a profile of gene therapy characteristics for use in future research. RESULTS: Key themes identified by PIH and clinical experts included patient relevant features and the importance of ‘informed decision making'. The six top‐ranked treatment attributes were ‘effect on factor level’ (79 points), ‘uncertainty regarding long‐term risks’ (57 points), ‘impact on daily life’ (41 points), ‘frequency of monitoring’ (33 points), ‘impact on ability to participate in physical activity’ (29 points), and ‘uncertainty regarding long‐term benefits’ (28 points). The final treatment characteristics were categorised as therapeutic option, treatment effectiveness, safety concerns, impact on self‐management and quality of life (role limitations). CONCLUSION: We identified several gene therapy characteristics important to PIH and clinicians in the UK. These characteristics will be used in a future DCE to further investigate patient preferences for gene therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9546085 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95460852022-10-14 Examining patient and professional perspectives in the UK for gene therapy in haemophilia Woollacott, Ione Morgan, George Chowdary, Pratima O'Hara, Jamie Franks, Bethany van Overbeeke, Eline Dunn, Nicola Michelsen, Sissel Huys, Isabelle Martin, Antony Cawson, Matthew Brownrigg, Jack Winburn, Ian Thomson, Jim Haemophilia Original Articles INTRODUCTION: With the development of gene therapy for people with haemophilia (PWH), it is important to understand how people impacted by haemophilia (PIH) and clinicians prioritise haemophilia treatment attributes to support informed treatment decisions. OBJECTIVE: To examine the treatment attribute preferences of PIH and clinical experts in the United Kingdom (UK) and to develop a profile of gene therapy characteristics fit for use in future discrete choice experiments (DCEs). METHODS: Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with PIH (n = 14) and clinical experts (n = 6) who ranked pre‐defined treatment attributes by importance. Framework analysis was conducted to identify key themes and treatment attributes; points were allocated based on the rankings. Synthesis of results by a multidisciplinary group informed development of a profile of gene therapy characteristics for use in future research. RESULTS: Key themes identified by PIH and clinical experts included patient relevant features and the importance of ‘informed decision making'. The six top‐ranked treatment attributes were ‘effect on factor level’ (79 points), ‘uncertainty regarding long‐term risks’ (57 points), ‘impact on daily life’ (41 points), ‘frequency of monitoring’ (33 points), ‘impact on ability to participate in physical activity’ (29 points), and ‘uncertainty regarding long‐term benefits’ (28 points). The final treatment characteristics were categorised as therapeutic option, treatment effectiveness, safety concerns, impact on self‐management and quality of life (role limitations). CONCLUSION: We identified several gene therapy characteristics important to PIH and clinicians in the UK. These characteristics will be used in a future DCE to further investigate patient preferences for gene therapy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-19 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9546085/ /pubmed/35438818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hae.14572 Text en © 2022 Pfizer Inc. Haemophilia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Woollacott, Ione Morgan, George Chowdary, Pratima O'Hara, Jamie Franks, Bethany van Overbeeke, Eline Dunn, Nicola Michelsen, Sissel Huys, Isabelle Martin, Antony Cawson, Matthew Brownrigg, Jack Winburn, Ian Thomson, Jim Examining patient and professional perspectives in the UK for gene therapy in haemophilia |
title | Examining patient and professional perspectives in the UK for gene therapy in haemophilia |
title_full | Examining patient and professional perspectives in the UK for gene therapy in haemophilia |
title_fullStr | Examining patient and professional perspectives in the UK for gene therapy in haemophilia |
title_full_unstemmed | Examining patient and professional perspectives in the UK for gene therapy in haemophilia |
title_short | Examining patient and professional perspectives in the UK for gene therapy in haemophilia |
title_sort | examining patient and professional perspectives in the uk for gene therapy in haemophilia |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35438818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hae.14572 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT woollacottione examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia AT morgangeorge examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia AT chowdarypratima examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia AT oharajamie examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia AT franksbethany examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia AT vanoverbeekeeline examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia AT dunnnicola examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia AT michelsensissel examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia AT huysisabelle examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia AT martinantony examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia AT cawsonmatthew examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia AT brownriggjack examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia AT winburnian examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia AT thomsonjim examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia |