Cargando…

Examining patient and professional perspectives in the UK for gene therapy in haemophilia

INTRODUCTION: With the development of gene therapy for people with haemophilia (PWH), it is important to understand how people impacted by haemophilia (PIH) and clinicians prioritise haemophilia treatment attributes to support informed treatment decisions. OBJECTIVE: To examine the treatment attribu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woollacott, Ione, Morgan, George, Chowdary, Pratima, O'Hara, Jamie, Franks, Bethany, van Overbeeke, Eline, Dunn, Nicola, Michelsen, Sissel, Huys, Isabelle, Martin, Antony, Cawson, Matthew, Brownrigg, Jack, Winburn, Ian, Thomson, Jim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35438818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hae.14572
_version_ 1784804963793240064
author Woollacott, Ione
Morgan, George
Chowdary, Pratima
O'Hara, Jamie
Franks, Bethany
van Overbeeke, Eline
Dunn, Nicola
Michelsen, Sissel
Huys, Isabelle
Martin, Antony
Cawson, Matthew
Brownrigg, Jack
Winburn, Ian
Thomson, Jim
author_facet Woollacott, Ione
Morgan, George
Chowdary, Pratima
O'Hara, Jamie
Franks, Bethany
van Overbeeke, Eline
Dunn, Nicola
Michelsen, Sissel
Huys, Isabelle
Martin, Antony
Cawson, Matthew
Brownrigg, Jack
Winburn, Ian
Thomson, Jim
author_sort Woollacott, Ione
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: With the development of gene therapy for people with haemophilia (PWH), it is important to understand how people impacted by haemophilia (PIH) and clinicians prioritise haemophilia treatment attributes to support informed treatment decisions. OBJECTIVE: To examine the treatment attribute preferences of PIH and clinical experts in the United Kingdom (UK) and to develop a profile of gene therapy characteristics fit for use in future discrete choice experiments (DCEs). METHODS: Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with PIH (n = 14) and clinical experts (n = 6) who ranked pre‐defined treatment attributes by importance. Framework analysis was conducted to identify key themes and treatment attributes; points were allocated based on the rankings. Synthesis of results by a multidisciplinary group informed development of a profile of gene therapy characteristics for use in future research. RESULTS: Key themes identified by PIH and clinical experts included patient relevant features and the importance of ‘informed decision making'. The six top‐ranked treatment attributes were ‘effect on factor level’ (79 points), ‘uncertainty regarding long‐term risks’ (57 points), ‘impact on daily life’ (41 points), ‘frequency of monitoring’ (33 points), ‘impact on ability to participate in physical activity’ (29 points), and ‘uncertainty regarding long‐term benefits’ (28 points). The final treatment characteristics were categorised as therapeutic option, treatment effectiveness, safety concerns, impact on self‐management and quality of life (role limitations). CONCLUSION: We identified several gene therapy characteristics important to PIH and clinicians in the UK. These characteristics will be used in a future DCE to further investigate patient preferences for gene therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9546085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95460852022-10-14 Examining patient and professional perspectives in the UK for gene therapy in haemophilia Woollacott, Ione Morgan, George Chowdary, Pratima O'Hara, Jamie Franks, Bethany van Overbeeke, Eline Dunn, Nicola Michelsen, Sissel Huys, Isabelle Martin, Antony Cawson, Matthew Brownrigg, Jack Winburn, Ian Thomson, Jim Haemophilia Original Articles INTRODUCTION: With the development of gene therapy for people with haemophilia (PWH), it is important to understand how people impacted by haemophilia (PIH) and clinicians prioritise haemophilia treatment attributes to support informed treatment decisions. OBJECTIVE: To examine the treatment attribute preferences of PIH and clinical experts in the United Kingdom (UK) and to develop a profile of gene therapy characteristics fit for use in future discrete choice experiments (DCEs). METHODS: Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with PIH (n = 14) and clinical experts (n = 6) who ranked pre‐defined treatment attributes by importance. Framework analysis was conducted to identify key themes and treatment attributes; points were allocated based on the rankings. Synthesis of results by a multidisciplinary group informed development of a profile of gene therapy characteristics for use in future research. RESULTS: Key themes identified by PIH and clinical experts included patient relevant features and the importance of ‘informed decision making'. The six top‐ranked treatment attributes were ‘effect on factor level’ (79 points), ‘uncertainty regarding long‐term risks’ (57 points), ‘impact on daily life’ (41 points), ‘frequency of monitoring’ (33 points), ‘impact on ability to participate in physical activity’ (29 points), and ‘uncertainty regarding long‐term benefits’ (28 points). The final treatment characteristics were categorised as therapeutic option, treatment effectiveness, safety concerns, impact on self‐management and quality of life (role limitations). CONCLUSION: We identified several gene therapy characteristics important to PIH and clinicians in the UK. These characteristics will be used in a future DCE to further investigate patient preferences for gene therapy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-19 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9546085/ /pubmed/35438818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hae.14572 Text en © 2022 Pfizer Inc. Haemophilia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Woollacott, Ione
Morgan, George
Chowdary, Pratima
O'Hara, Jamie
Franks, Bethany
van Overbeeke, Eline
Dunn, Nicola
Michelsen, Sissel
Huys, Isabelle
Martin, Antony
Cawson, Matthew
Brownrigg, Jack
Winburn, Ian
Thomson, Jim
Examining patient and professional perspectives in the UK for gene therapy in haemophilia
title Examining patient and professional perspectives in the UK for gene therapy in haemophilia
title_full Examining patient and professional perspectives in the UK for gene therapy in haemophilia
title_fullStr Examining patient and professional perspectives in the UK for gene therapy in haemophilia
title_full_unstemmed Examining patient and professional perspectives in the UK for gene therapy in haemophilia
title_short Examining patient and professional perspectives in the UK for gene therapy in haemophilia
title_sort examining patient and professional perspectives in the uk for gene therapy in haemophilia
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35438818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hae.14572
work_keys_str_mv AT woollacottione examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia
AT morgangeorge examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia
AT chowdarypratima examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia
AT oharajamie examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia
AT franksbethany examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia
AT vanoverbeekeeline examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia
AT dunnnicola examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia
AT michelsensissel examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia
AT huysisabelle examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia
AT martinantony examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia
AT cawsonmatthew examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia
AT brownriggjack examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia
AT winburnian examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia
AT thomsonjim examiningpatientandprofessionalperspectivesintheukforgenetherapyinhaemophilia