Cargando…

Randomized controlled trial of low vs high oxygen during neonatal anesthesia: Oxygenation, feasibility, and oxidative stress

BACKGROUND: To reduce risk for intermittent hypoxia a high fraction of inspired oxygen is routinely used during anesthesia induction. This differs from the cautious dosing of oxygen during neonatal resuscitation and intensive care and may result in significant hyperoxia. AIM: In a randomized control...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karlsson, Victoria, Sporre, Bengt, Fredén, Filip, Ågren, Johan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35791748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pan.14519
_version_ 1784804974425800704
author Karlsson, Victoria
Sporre, Bengt
Fredén, Filip
Ågren, Johan
author_facet Karlsson, Victoria
Sporre, Bengt
Fredén, Filip
Ågren, Johan
author_sort Karlsson, Victoria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To reduce risk for intermittent hypoxia a high fraction of inspired oxygen is routinely used during anesthesia induction. This differs from the cautious dosing of oxygen during neonatal resuscitation and intensive care and may result in significant hyperoxia. AIM: In a randomized controlled trial, we evaluated oxygenation during general anesthesia with a low (23%) vs a high (80% during induction and recovery, and 40% during maintenance) fraction of inspired oxygen, in newborn infants undergoing surgery. METHOD: Thirty‐five newborn infants with postconceptional age of 35–44 weeks were included (17 infants in low and 18 in high oxygen group). Oxygenation was monitored by transcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen, pulse oximetry, and cerebral oxygenation. Predefined SpO2 safety targets dictated when to increase inspired oxygen. RESULTS: At start of anesthesia, oxygenation was similar in both groups. Throughout anesthesia, the high oxygen group displayed significant hyperoxia with higher (difference−20.3 kPa, 95% confidence interval (CI)—28.4 to 12.2, p < .001) transcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen values than the low oxygen group. While SpO2 in the low oxygen group was lower (difference − 5.8%, 95% CI –9.3 to –2.4, p < .001) during anesthesia, none of the infants spent enough time below SpO(2) safety targets to mandate supplemental oxygen, and cerebral oxygenation was within the normal range and not statistically different between the groups. Analysis of the oxidative stress biomarker urinary F(2)‐Isoprostane revealed no differences between the low and high oxygen group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that in healthy newborn infants, use of low oxygen during general anesthesia was feasible, while the prevailing practice of using high levels of inspired oxygen resulted in significant hyperoxia. The trade‐off between careful dosing of oxygen and risks of hypo‐ and hyperoxia in neonatal anesthesia should be further examined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9546133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95461332022-10-14 Randomized controlled trial of low vs high oxygen during neonatal anesthesia: Oxygenation, feasibility, and oxidative stress Karlsson, Victoria Sporre, Bengt Fredén, Filip Ågren, Johan Paediatr Anaesth Research Reports BACKGROUND: To reduce risk for intermittent hypoxia a high fraction of inspired oxygen is routinely used during anesthesia induction. This differs from the cautious dosing of oxygen during neonatal resuscitation and intensive care and may result in significant hyperoxia. AIM: In a randomized controlled trial, we evaluated oxygenation during general anesthesia with a low (23%) vs a high (80% during induction and recovery, and 40% during maintenance) fraction of inspired oxygen, in newborn infants undergoing surgery. METHOD: Thirty‐five newborn infants with postconceptional age of 35–44 weeks were included (17 infants in low and 18 in high oxygen group). Oxygenation was monitored by transcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen, pulse oximetry, and cerebral oxygenation. Predefined SpO2 safety targets dictated when to increase inspired oxygen. RESULTS: At start of anesthesia, oxygenation was similar in both groups. Throughout anesthesia, the high oxygen group displayed significant hyperoxia with higher (difference−20.3 kPa, 95% confidence interval (CI)—28.4 to 12.2, p < .001) transcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen values than the low oxygen group. While SpO2 in the low oxygen group was lower (difference − 5.8%, 95% CI –9.3 to –2.4, p < .001) during anesthesia, none of the infants spent enough time below SpO(2) safety targets to mandate supplemental oxygen, and cerebral oxygenation was within the normal range and not statistically different between the groups. Analysis of the oxidative stress biomarker urinary F(2)‐Isoprostane revealed no differences between the low and high oxygen group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that in healthy newborn infants, use of low oxygen during general anesthesia was feasible, while the prevailing practice of using high levels of inspired oxygen resulted in significant hyperoxia. The trade‐off between careful dosing of oxygen and risks of hypo‐ and hyperoxia in neonatal anesthesia should be further examined. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-13 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9546133/ /pubmed/35791748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pan.14519 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Pediatric Anesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Reports
Karlsson, Victoria
Sporre, Bengt
Fredén, Filip
Ågren, Johan
Randomized controlled trial of low vs high oxygen during neonatal anesthesia: Oxygenation, feasibility, and oxidative stress
title Randomized controlled trial of low vs high oxygen during neonatal anesthesia: Oxygenation, feasibility, and oxidative stress
title_full Randomized controlled trial of low vs high oxygen during neonatal anesthesia: Oxygenation, feasibility, and oxidative stress
title_fullStr Randomized controlled trial of low vs high oxygen during neonatal anesthesia: Oxygenation, feasibility, and oxidative stress
title_full_unstemmed Randomized controlled trial of low vs high oxygen during neonatal anesthesia: Oxygenation, feasibility, and oxidative stress
title_short Randomized controlled trial of low vs high oxygen during neonatal anesthesia: Oxygenation, feasibility, and oxidative stress
title_sort randomized controlled trial of low vs high oxygen during neonatal anesthesia: oxygenation, feasibility, and oxidative stress
topic Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35791748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pan.14519
work_keys_str_mv AT karlssonvictoria randomizedcontrolledtrialoflowvshighoxygenduringneonatalanesthesiaoxygenationfeasibilityandoxidativestress
AT sporrebengt randomizedcontrolledtrialoflowvshighoxygenduringneonatalanesthesiaoxygenationfeasibilityandoxidativestress
AT fredenfilip randomizedcontrolledtrialoflowvshighoxygenduringneonatalanesthesiaoxygenationfeasibilityandoxidativestress
AT agrenjohan randomizedcontrolledtrialoflowvshighoxygenduringneonatalanesthesiaoxygenationfeasibilityandoxidativestress