Cargando…

‘Barriers to overcoming the barriers': A scoping review exploring 30 years of clinical supervision literature

AIMS/QUESTIONS: To explore the barriers and facilitators to nurses accessing clinical supervision; explore the barriers and facilitators to organizations implementing clinical supervision and capture what skills nurses require to facilitate clinical supervision. DESIGN: Scoping review of peer‐review...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Masamha, Roselyne, Alfred, Lolita, Harris, Ruth, Bassett, Sally, Burden, Sarah, Gilmore, Annette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35578563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15283
_version_ 1784804975422996480
author Masamha, Roselyne
Alfred, Lolita
Harris, Ruth
Bassett, Sally
Burden, Sarah
Gilmore, Annette
author_facet Masamha, Roselyne
Alfred, Lolita
Harris, Ruth
Bassett, Sally
Burden, Sarah
Gilmore, Annette
author_sort Masamha, Roselyne
collection PubMed
description AIMS/QUESTIONS: To explore the barriers and facilitators to nurses accessing clinical supervision; explore the barriers and facilitators to organizations implementing clinical supervision and capture what skills nurses require to facilitate clinical supervision. DESIGN: Scoping review of peer‐reviewed research and grey literature. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, Medline, PsychINFO and Scopus were searched for relevant papers published between 1990 and 2020. Google, Google Scholar, OpenGrey & EThOS were used to search for grey literature. REVIEW METHODS: PRISMA‐ScR guidelines were used during the literature review process. Eighty‐seven papers were included, and data were extracted from each paper using a standardized form. Data synthesis was undertaken using Seidel's analytical framework. RESULTS: Five themes were identified: Definitions and Models, (Mis) Trust and the Language of Supervision, Alternative Parallel Forums and Support Mechanisms, Time and Cost and Skills required. CONCLUSION: Since its inception in the 1990s, clinical supervision has long been regarded as a supportive platform for nurses to reflect on and develop their practice. However, this review highlights that despite an awareness of the skills required for nurses to undertake clinical supervision, and the facilitators for nurses to access and organizations to implement clinical supervision, there have been persistent barriers to implementation. This review identifies these persistent factors as ‘barriers to overcoming the barriers' in the clinical supervision landscape. These require critical consideration to contribute towards moving clinical supervision forward in the spirit of its original intentions. IMPACT: This review progresses the debate on clinical supervision through critically analysing the barriers to overcoming the barriers. To this end, the review is designed to stimulate critical discussions amongst nurses in different clinical spaces and key stakeholders such as policy makers and regulatory bodies for the nursing profession.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9546137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95461372022-10-14 ‘Barriers to overcoming the barriers': A scoping review exploring 30 years of clinical supervision literature Masamha, Roselyne Alfred, Lolita Harris, Ruth Bassett, Sally Burden, Sarah Gilmore, Annette J Adv Nurs Reviews AIMS/QUESTIONS: To explore the barriers and facilitators to nurses accessing clinical supervision; explore the barriers and facilitators to organizations implementing clinical supervision and capture what skills nurses require to facilitate clinical supervision. DESIGN: Scoping review of peer‐reviewed research and grey literature. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, Medline, PsychINFO and Scopus were searched for relevant papers published between 1990 and 2020. Google, Google Scholar, OpenGrey & EThOS were used to search for grey literature. REVIEW METHODS: PRISMA‐ScR guidelines were used during the literature review process. Eighty‐seven papers were included, and data were extracted from each paper using a standardized form. Data synthesis was undertaken using Seidel's analytical framework. RESULTS: Five themes were identified: Definitions and Models, (Mis) Trust and the Language of Supervision, Alternative Parallel Forums and Support Mechanisms, Time and Cost and Skills required. CONCLUSION: Since its inception in the 1990s, clinical supervision has long been regarded as a supportive platform for nurses to reflect on and develop their practice. However, this review highlights that despite an awareness of the skills required for nurses to undertake clinical supervision, and the facilitators for nurses to access and organizations to implement clinical supervision, there have been persistent barriers to implementation. This review identifies these persistent factors as ‘barriers to overcoming the barriers' in the clinical supervision landscape. These require critical consideration to contribute towards moving clinical supervision forward in the spirit of its original intentions. IMPACT: This review progresses the debate on clinical supervision through critically analysing the barriers to overcoming the barriers. To this end, the review is designed to stimulate critical discussions amongst nurses in different clinical spaces and key stakeholders such as policy makers and regulatory bodies for the nursing profession. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-16 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9546137/ /pubmed/35578563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15283 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Advanced Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Masamha, Roselyne
Alfred, Lolita
Harris, Ruth
Bassett, Sally
Burden, Sarah
Gilmore, Annette
‘Barriers to overcoming the barriers': A scoping review exploring 30 years of clinical supervision literature
title ‘Barriers to overcoming the barriers': A scoping review exploring 30 years of clinical supervision literature
title_full ‘Barriers to overcoming the barriers': A scoping review exploring 30 years of clinical supervision literature
title_fullStr ‘Barriers to overcoming the barriers': A scoping review exploring 30 years of clinical supervision literature
title_full_unstemmed ‘Barriers to overcoming the barriers': A scoping review exploring 30 years of clinical supervision literature
title_short ‘Barriers to overcoming the barriers': A scoping review exploring 30 years of clinical supervision literature
title_sort ‘barriers to overcoming the barriers': a scoping review exploring 30 years of clinical supervision literature
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35578563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15283
work_keys_str_mv AT masamharoselyne barrierstoovercomingthebarriersascopingreviewexploring30yearsofclinicalsupervisionliterature
AT alfredlolita barrierstoovercomingthebarriersascopingreviewexploring30yearsofclinicalsupervisionliterature
AT harrisruth barrierstoovercomingthebarriersascopingreviewexploring30yearsofclinicalsupervisionliterature
AT bassettsally barrierstoovercomingthebarriersascopingreviewexploring30yearsofclinicalsupervisionliterature
AT burdensarah barrierstoovercomingthebarriersascopingreviewexploring30yearsofclinicalsupervisionliterature
AT gilmoreannette barrierstoovercomingthebarriersascopingreviewexploring30yearsofclinicalsupervisionliterature