Cargando…
‘Barriers to overcoming the barriers': A scoping review exploring 30 years of clinical supervision literature
AIMS/QUESTIONS: To explore the barriers and facilitators to nurses accessing clinical supervision; explore the barriers and facilitators to organizations implementing clinical supervision and capture what skills nurses require to facilitate clinical supervision. DESIGN: Scoping review of peer‐review...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546137/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35578563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15283 |
_version_ | 1784804975422996480 |
---|---|
author | Masamha, Roselyne Alfred, Lolita Harris, Ruth Bassett, Sally Burden, Sarah Gilmore, Annette |
author_facet | Masamha, Roselyne Alfred, Lolita Harris, Ruth Bassett, Sally Burden, Sarah Gilmore, Annette |
author_sort | Masamha, Roselyne |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS/QUESTIONS: To explore the barriers and facilitators to nurses accessing clinical supervision; explore the barriers and facilitators to organizations implementing clinical supervision and capture what skills nurses require to facilitate clinical supervision. DESIGN: Scoping review of peer‐reviewed research and grey literature. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, Medline, PsychINFO and Scopus were searched for relevant papers published between 1990 and 2020. Google, Google Scholar, OpenGrey & EThOS were used to search for grey literature. REVIEW METHODS: PRISMA‐ScR guidelines were used during the literature review process. Eighty‐seven papers were included, and data were extracted from each paper using a standardized form. Data synthesis was undertaken using Seidel's analytical framework. RESULTS: Five themes were identified: Definitions and Models, (Mis) Trust and the Language of Supervision, Alternative Parallel Forums and Support Mechanisms, Time and Cost and Skills required. CONCLUSION: Since its inception in the 1990s, clinical supervision has long been regarded as a supportive platform for nurses to reflect on and develop their practice. However, this review highlights that despite an awareness of the skills required for nurses to undertake clinical supervision, and the facilitators for nurses to access and organizations to implement clinical supervision, there have been persistent barriers to implementation. This review identifies these persistent factors as ‘barriers to overcoming the barriers' in the clinical supervision landscape. These require critical consideration to contribute towards moving clinical supervision forward in the spirit of its original intentions. IMPACT: This review progresses the debate on clinical supervision through critically analysing the barriers to overcoming the barriers. To this end, the review is designed to stimulate critical discussions amongst nurses in different clinical spaces and key stakeholders such as policy makers and regulatory bodies for the nursing profession. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9546137 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95461372022-10-14 ‘Barriers to overcoming the barriers': A scoping review exploring 30 years of clinical supervision literature Masamha, Roselyne Alfred, Lolita Harris, Ruth Bassett, Sally Burden, Sarah Gilmore, Annette J Adv Nurs Reviews AIMS/QUESTIONS: To explore the barriers and facilitators to nurses accessing clinical supervision; explore the barriers and facilitators to organizations implementing clinical supervision and capture what skills nurses require to facilitate clinical supervision. DESIGN: Scoping review of peer‐reviewed research and grey literature. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, Medline, PsychINFO and Scopus were searched for relevant papers published between 1990 and 2020. Google, Google Scholar, OpenGrey & EThOS were used to search for grey literature. REVIEW METHODS: PRISMA‐ScR guidelines were used during the literature review process. Eighty‐seven papers were included, and data were extracted from each paper using a standardized form. Data synthesis was undertaken using Seidel's analytical framework. RESULTS: Five themes were identified: Definitions and Models, (Mis) Trust and the Language of Supervision, Alternative Parallel Forums and Support Mechanisms, Time and Cost and Skills required. CONCLUSION: Since its inception in the 1990s, clinical supervision has long been regarded as a supportive platform for nurses to reflect on and develop their practice. However, this review highlights that despite an awareness of the skills required for nurses to undertake clinical supervision, and the facilitators for nurses to access and organizations to implement clinical supervision, there have been persistent barriers to implementation. This review identifies these persistent factors as ‘barriers to overcoming the barriers' in the clinical supervision landscape. These require critical consideration to contribute towards moving clinical supervision forward in the spirit of its original intentions. IMPACT: This review progresses the debate on clinical supervision through critically analysing the barriers to overcoming the barriers. To this end, the review is designed to stimulate critical discussions amongst nurses in different clinical spaces and key stakeholders such as policy makers and regulatory bodies for the nursing profession. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-16 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9546137/ /pubmed/35578563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15283 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Advanced Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Masamha, Roselyne Alfred, Lolita Harris, Ruth Bassett, Sally Burden, Sarah Gilmore, Annette ‘Barriers to overcoming the barriers': A scoping review exploring 30 years of clinical supervision literature |
title | ‘Barriers to overcoming the barriers': A scoping review exploring 30 years of clinical supervision literature |
title_full | ‘Barriers to overcoming the barriers': A scoping review exploring 30 years of clinical supervision literature |
title_fullStr | ‘Barriers to overcoming the barriers': A scoping review exploring 30 years of clinical supervision literature |
title_full_unstemmed | ‘Barriers to overcoming the barriers': A scoping review exploring 30 years of clinical supervision literature |
title_short | ‘Barriers to overcoming the barriers': A scoping review exploring 30 years of clinical supervision literature |
title_sort | ‘barriers to overcoming the barriers': a scoping review exploring 30 years of clinical supervision literature |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546137/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35578563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15283 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT masamharoselyne barrierstoovercomingthebarriersascopingreviewexploring30yearsofclinicalsupervisionliterature AT alfredlolita barrierstoovercomingthebarriersascopingreviewexploring30yearsofclinicalsupervisionliterature AT harrisruth barrierstoovercomingthebarriersascopingreviewexploring30yearsofclinicalsupervisionliterature AT bassettsally barrierstoovercomingthebarriersascopingreviewexploring30yearsofclinicalsupervisionliterature AT burdensarah barrierstoovercomingthebarriersascopingreviewexploring30yearsofclinicalsupervisionliterature AT gilmoreannette barrierstoovercomingthebarriersascopingreviewexploring30yearsofclinicalsupervisionliterature |