Cargando…

Descriptive analysis of national bovine viral diarrhoea test data in England (2016–2020)

BACKGROUND: Bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) causes substantial economic losses to the cattle industry; however, control and eradication can be achieved by identifying and removing persistently infected cattle from the herd. Each UK nation has separate control programmes. The English scheme, BVDF...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prosser, Naomi S., Hill, Edward M., Armstrong, Derek, Gow, Lorna, Tildesley, Michael J., Keeling, Matt J., Kaler, Jasmeet, Ferguson, Eamonn, Green, Martin J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35876163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vetr.1854
_version_ 1784804997457772544
author Prosser, Naomi S.
Hill, Edward M.
Armstrong, Derek
Gow, Lorna
Tildesley, Michael J.
Keeling, Matt J.
Kaler, Jasmeet
Ferguson, Eamonn
Green, Martin J.
author_facet Prosser, Naomi S.
Hill, Edward M.
Armstrong, Derek
Gow, Lorna
Tildesley, Michael J.
Keeling, Matt J.
Kaler, Jasmeet
Ferguson, Eamonn
Green, Martin J.
author_sort Prosser, Naomi S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) causes substantial economic losses to the cattle industry; however, control and eradication can be achieved by identifying and removing persistently infected cattle from the herd. Each UK nation has separate control programmes. The English scheme, BVDFree, started in 2016 and is voluntary. METHODS: We analysed the test results submitted to BVDFree from 5847 herds between 2016 and 2020. RESULTS: In 2020, 13.5% of beef breeders and 20.0% of dairy herds that submitted tests had at least one positive (virus/antibody) test result. Although lower than in previous years, there was no clear trend in the proportion of positive tests over time. In virus testing herds, 0.4% of individual tests were positive in 2020, and 1.5% of individual tests were positive in BVDV‐positive virus testing herds. Dairy herds and larger herds were more likely to join BVDFree, and dairy herds were also more likely to virus test than beef breeder herds. Larger herds, herds that used virus testing and herds that had BVDV‐positive test results were more likely to continue submitting tests to BVDFree. CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide a benchmark for the status of BVDV control in England; continued analysis of test results will be important to assess progress towards eradication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9546236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95462362022-10-14 Descriptive analysis of national bovine viral diarrhoea test data in England (2016–2020) Prosser, Naomi S. Hill, Edward M. Armstrong, Derek Gow, Lorna Tildesley, Michael J. Keeling, Matt J. Kaler, Jasmeet Ferguson, Eamonn Green, Martin J. Vet Rec Research BACKGROUND: Bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) causes substantial economic losses to the cattle industry; however, control and eradication can be achieved by identifying and removing persistently infected cattle from the herd. Each UK nation has separate control programmes. The English scheme, BVDFree, started in 2016 and is voluntary. METHODS: We analysed the test results submitted to BVDFree from 5847 herds between 2016 and 2020. RESULTS: In 2020, 13.5% of beef breeders and 20.0% of dairy herds that submitted tests had at least one positive (virus/antibody) test result. Although lower than in previous years, there was no clear trend in the proportion of positive tests over time. In virus testing herds, 0.4% of individual tests were positive in 2020, and 1.5% of individual tests were positive in BVDV‐positive virus testing herds. Dairy herds and larger herds were more likely to join BVDFree, and dairy herds were also more likely to virus test than beef breeder herds. Larger herds, herds that used virus testing and herds that had BVDV‐positive test results were more likely to continue submitting tests to BVDFree. CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide a benchmark for the status of BVDV control in England; continued analysis of test results will be important to assess progress towards eradication. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-25 2022-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9546236/ /pubmed/35876163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vetr.1854 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Veterinary Record published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Veterinary Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Prosser, Naomi S.
Hill, Edward M.
Armstrong, Derek
Gow, Lorna
Tildesley, Michael J.
Keeling, Matt J.
Kaler, Jasmeet
Ferguson, Eamonn
Green, Martin J.
Descriptive analysis of national bovine viral diarrhoea test data in England (2016–2020)
title Descriptive analysis of national bovine viral diarrhoea test data in England (2016–2020)
title_full Descriptive analysis of national bovine viral diarrhoea test data in England (2016–2020)
title_fullStr Descriptive analysis of national bovine viral diarrhoea test data in England (2016–2020)
title_full_unstemmed Descriptive analysis of national bovine viral diarrhoea test data in England (2016–2020)
title_short Descriptive analysis of national bovine viral diarrhoea test data in England (2016–2020)
title_sort descriptive analysis of national bovine viral diarrhoea test data in england (2016–2020)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35876163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vetr.1854
work_keys_str_mv AT prossernaomis descriptiveanalysisofnationalbovineviraldiarrhoeatestdatainengland20162020
AT hilledwardm descriptiveanalysisofnationalbovineviraldiarrhoeatestdatainengland20162020
AT armstrongderek descriptiveanalysisofnationalbovineviraldiarrhoeatestdatainengland20162020
AT gowlorna descriptiveanalysisofnationalbovineviraldiarrhoeatestdatainengland20162020
AT tildesleymichaelj descriptiveanalysisofnationalbovineviraldiarrhoeatestdatainengland20162020
AT keelingmattj descriptiveanalysisofnationalbovineviraldiarrhoeatestdatainengland20162020
AT kalerjasmeet descriptiveanalysisofnationalbovineviraldiarrhoeatestdatainengland20162020
AT fergusoneamonn descriptiveanalysisofnationalbovineviraldiarrhoeatestdatainengland20162020
AT greenmartinj descriptiveanalysisofnationalbovineviraldiarrhoeatestdatainengland20162020