Cargando…
Evaluating nutrition education interventions for medical students: A rapid review
BACKGROUND: Unhealthy diets account for 20% of all deaths globally. Most medical schools do not sufficiently teach their students the clinical application of nutrition science. Evaluating the efficacy of nutrition education interventions is therefore important for their widespread implementation. ME...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34842308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12972 |
_version_ | 1784805011129106432 |
---|---|
author | Patel, Priya Kassam, Shireen |
author_facet | Patel, Priya Kassam, Shireen |
author_sort | Patel, Priya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Unhealthy diets account for 20% of all deaths globally. Most medical schools do not sufficiently teach their students the clinical application of nutrition science. Evaluating the efficacy of nutrition education interventions is therefore important for their widespread implementation. METHODS: A rapid review of the literature published between 2015 and 2020 was conducted to identify nutrition education interventions delivered to undergraduate medical students. The modified Kirkpatrick hierarchy score was used to evaluate the outcome measures. Study characteristics and outcomes were charted and discussed using narrative synthesis. Included studies were appraised using the MERSQI criteria. RESULTS: Fifteen nutrition education interventions met the inclusion criteria. Twelve were from the USA and most were optional rather than compulsory. Interventions involved a mixture of methods including cooking sessions, lectures, and student‐led programs. The content covered was variable and the median duration was 11 h (range 90 min to 75 h). The modified Kirkpatrick scores varied and the median MERSQI score was 12.8/18. No studies reported the use of national or standardised guidance to inform the learning objectives of the interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The interventions reviewed are heterogenous in their nature and outcomes. This review highlights the advantages of utilising interprofessional learning, focusing on student's personal health behaviours and harnessing novel teaching methods such as hands‐on cooking. Using national guidance to develop learning outcomes will help to standardise the content taught. Future studies may aim to use validated assessment tools and investigate the long‐term impacts on delivery of care and patient outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9546301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95463012022-10-14 Evaluating nutrition education interventions for medical students: A rapid review Patel, Priya Kassam, Shireen J Hum Nutr Diet Nutrition Workforce Education and Training BACKGROUND: Unhealthy diets account for 20% of all deaths globally. Most medical schools do not sufficiently teach their students the clinical application of nutrition science. Evaluating the efficacy of nutrition education interventions is therefore important for their widespread implementation. METHODS: A rapid review of the literature published between 2015 and 2020 was conducted to identify nutrition education interventions delivered to undergraduate medical students. The modified Kirkpatrick hierarchy score was used to evaluate the outcome measures. Study characteristics and outcomes were charted and discussed using narrative synthesis. Included studies were appraised using the MERSQI criteria. RESULTS: Fifteen nutrition education interventions met the inclusion criteria. Twelve were from the USA and most were optional rather than compulsory. Interventions involved a mixture of methods including cooking sessions, lectures, and student‐led programs. The content covered was variable and the median duration was 11 h (range 90 min to 75 h). The modified Kirkpatrick scores varied and the median MERSQI score was 12.8/18. No studies reported the use of national or standardised guidance to inform the learning objectives of the interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The interventions reviewed are heterogenous in their nature and outcomes. This review highlights the advantages of utilising interprofessional learning, focusing on student's personal health behaviours and harnessing novel teaching methods such as hands‐on cooking. Using national guidance to develop learning outcomes will help to standardise the content taught. Future studies may aim to use validated assessment tools and investigate the long‐term impacts on delivery of care and patient outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-29 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9546301/ /pubmed/34842308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12972 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Dietetic Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Nutrition Workforce Education and Training Patel, Priya Kassam, Shireen Evaluating nutrition education interventions for medical students: A rapid review |
title | Evaluating nutrition education interventions for medical students: A rapid review |
title_full | Evaluating nutrition education interventions for medical students: A rapid review |
title_fullStr | Evaluating nutrition education interventions for medical students: A rapid review |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating nutrition education interventions for medical students: A rapid review |
title_short | Evaluating nutrition education interventions for medical students: A rapid review |
title_sort | evaluating nutrition education interventions for medical students: a rapid review |
topic | Nutrition Workforce Education and Training |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34842308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12972 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patelpriya evaluatingnutritioneducationinterventionsformedicalstudentsarapidreview AT kassamshireen evaluatingnutritioneducationinterventionsformedicalstudentsarapidreview |