Cargando…

Retrospective clinical study of tooth‐supported single crowns: A multifactor analysis

The purpose of the study was to investigate the influence of multiple factors on the survival of tooth‐supported single crowns and assess the biological and technical complications. This retrospective study included patients rehabilitated with single crowns with a minimum follow‐up time of 6 months...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hawthan, Mohammed, Chrcanovic, Bruno R., Larsson, Christel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35613306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eos.12871
_version_ 1784805022465261568
author Hawthan, Mohammed
Chrcanovic, Bruno R.
Larsson, Christel
author_facet Hawthan, Mohammed
Chrcanovic, Bruno R.
Larsson, Christel
author_sort Hawthan, Mohammed
collection PubMed
description The purpose of the study was to investigate the influence of multiple factors on the survival of tooth‐supported single crowns and assess the biological and technical complications. This retrospective study included patients rehabilitated with single crowns with a minimum follow‐up time of 6 months after delivery. The cumulative survival rate was calculated over the maximum period of follow‐up time and reported in a life‐table survival analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression was used to evaluate the associations between clinical covariates and crown failure. The included cohort group consisted of 1037 single crowns delivered in 401 patients and followed for a mean of 134.8 ± 80.2 months. Cumulative survival rate was 89.9% and 80.9% after 5 and 10 years and 70.5% and 61.8% after 15 and 20 years, respectively. The main reasons for single crown failure were loss of retention, tooth loss, and fracture. Anterior placement, non‐vital abutments, and bruxism significantly influenced the survival of single crowns. The survival of single crowns was not influenced by patient's age and sex, location of the crowns in relation to the jaws, type of tooth, presence of post and core, and type of crown material, treatment providers, or smoking. Anterior placement, non‐vital abutments, and bruxism are factors suggested to increase the risk of single crown failure and the prevalence of technical and biological complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9546353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95463532022-10-14 Retrospective clinical study of tooth‐supported single crowns: A multifactor analysis Hawthan, Mohammed Chrcanovic, Bruno R. Larsson, Christel Eur J Oral Sci Original Articles The purpose of the study was to investigate the influence of multiple factors on the survival of tooth‐supported single crowns and assess the biological and technical complications. This retrospective study included patients rehabilitated with single crowns with a minimum follow‐up time of 6 months after delivery. The cumulative survival rate was calculated over the maximum period of follow‐up time and reported in a life‐table survival analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression was used to evaluate the associations between clinical covariates and crown failure. The included cohort group consisted of 1037 single crowns delivered in 401 patients and followed for a mean of 134.8 ± 80.2 months. Cumulative survival rate was 89.9% and 80.9% after 5 and 10 years and 70.5% and 61.8% after 15 and 20 years, respectively. The main reasons for single crown failure were loss of retention, tooth loss, and fracture. Anterior placement, non‐vital abutments, and bruxism significantly influenced the survival of single crowns. The survival of single crowns was not influenced by patient's age and sex, location of the crowns in relation to the jaws, type of tooth, presence of post and core, and type of crown material, treatment providers, or smoking. Anterior placement, non‐vital abutments, and bruxism are factors suggested to increase the risk of single crown failure and the prevalence of technical and biological complications. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-25 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9546353/ /pubmed/35613306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eos.12871 Text en © 2022 Scandinavian Division of the International Association for Dental Research. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hawthan, Mohammed
Chrcanovic, Bruno R.
Larsson, Christel
Retrospective clinical study of tooth‐supported single crowns: A multifactor analysis
title Retrospective clinical study of tooth‐supported single crowns: A multifactor analysis
title_full Retrospective clinical study of tooth‐supported single crowns: A multifactor analysis
title_fullStr Retrospective clinical study of tooth‐supported single crowns: A multifactor analysis
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective clinical study of tooth‐supported single crowns: A multifactor analysis
title_short Retrospective clinical study of tooth‐supported single crowns: A multifactor analysis
title_sort retrospective clinical study of tooth‐supported single crowns: a multifactor analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35613306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eos.12871
work_keys_str_mv AT hawthanmohammed retrospectiveclinicalstudyoftoothsupportedsinglecrownsamultifactoranalysis
AT chrcanovicbrunor retrospectiveclinicalstudyoftoothsupportedsinglecrownsamultifactoranalysis
AT larssonchristel retrospectiveclinicalstudyoftoothsupportedsinglecrownsamultifactoranalysis