Cargando…

Untangling social–ecological interactions: A methods portfolio approach to tackling contemporary sustainability challenges in fisheries

Meeting the objectives of sustainable fisheries management requires attention to the complex interactions between humans, institutions and ecosystems that give rise to fishery outcomes. Traditional approaches to studying fisheries often do not fully capture, nor focus on these complex interactions b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindkvist, Emilie, Pellowe, Kara E., Alexander, Steven M., Drury O'Neill, Elizabeth, Finkbeiner, Elena M., Girón‐Nava, Alfredo, González‐Mon, Blanca, Johnson, Andrew F., Pittman, Jeremy, Schill, Caroline, Wijermans, Nanda, Bodin, Örjan, Gelcich, Stefan, Glaser, Marion
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/faf.12678
_version_ 1784805027749036032
author Lindkvist, Emilie
Pellowe, Kara E.
Alexander, Steven M.
Drury O'Neill, Elizabeth
Finkbeiner, Elena M.
Girón‐Nava, Alfredo
González‐Mon, Blanca
Johnson, Andrew F.
Pittman, Jeremy
Schill, Caroline
Wijermans, Nanda
Bodin, Örjan
Gelcich, Stefan
Glaser, Marion
author_facet Lindkvist, Emilie
Pellowe, Kara E.
Alexander, Steven M.
Drury O'Neill, Elizabeth
Finkbeiner, Elena M.
Girón‐Nava, Alfredo
González‐Mon, Blanca
Johnson, Andrew F.
Pittman, Jeremy
Schill, Caroline
Wijermans, Nanda
Bodin, Örjan
Gelcich, Stefan
Glaser, Marion
author_sort Lindkvist, Emilie
collection PubMed
description Meeting the objectives of sustainable fisheries management requires attention to the complex interactions between humans, institutions and ecosystems that give rise to fishery outcomes. Traditional approaches to studying fisheries often do not fully capture, nor focus on these complex interactions between people and ecosystems. Despite advances in the scope and scale of interactions encompassed by more holistic methods, for example ecosystem‐based fisheries management approaches, no single method can adequately capture the complexity of human–nature interactions. Approaches that combine quantitative and qualitative analytical approaches are necessary to generate a deeper understanding of these interactions and illuminate pathways to address fisheries sustainability challenges. However, combining methods is inherently challenging and requires understanding multiple methods from different, often disciplinarily distinct origins, demanding reflexivity of the researchers involved. Social–ecological systems’ research has a history of utilising combinations of methods across the social and ecological realms to account for spatial and temporal dynamics, uncertainty and feedbacks that are key components of fisheries. We describe several categories of analytical methods (statistical modelling, network analysis, dynamic modelling, qualitative analysis and controlled behavioural experiments) and highlight their applications in fisheries research, strengths and limitations, data needs and overall objectives. We then discuss important considerations of a methods portfolio development process, including reflexivity, epistemological and ontological concerns and illustrate these considerations via three case studies. We show that, by expanding their methods portfolios, researchers will be better equipped to study the complex interactions shaping fisheries and contribute to solutions for sustainable fisheries management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9546375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95463752022-10-14 Untangling social–ecological interactions: A methods portfolio approach to tackling contemporary sustainability challenges in fisheries Lindkvist, Emilie Pellowe, Kara E. Alexander, Steven M. Drury O'Neill, Elizabeth Finkbeiner, Elena M. Girón‐Nava, Alfredo González‐Mon, Blanca Johnson, Andrew F. Pittman, Jeremy Schill, Caroline Wijermans, Nanda Bodin, Örjan Gelcich, Stefan Glaser, Marion Fish Fish (Oxf) Original Articles Meeting the objectives of sustainable fisheries management requires attention to the complex interactions between humans, institutions and ecosystems that give rise to fishery outcomes. Traditional approaches to studying fisheries often do not fully capture, nor focus on these complex interactions between people and ecosystems. Despite advances in the scope and scale of interactions encompassed by more holistic methods, for example ecosystem‐based fisheries management approaches, no single method can adequately capture the complexity of human–nature interactions. Approaches that combine quantitative and qualitative analytical approaches are necessary to generate a deeper understanding of these interactions and illuminate pathways to address fisheries sustainability challenges. However, combining methods is inherently challenging and requires understanding multiple methods from different, often disciplinarily distinct origins, demanding reflexivity of the researchers involved. Social–ecological systems’ research has a history of utilising combinations of methods across the social and ecological realms to account for spatial and temporal dynamics, uncertainty and feedbacks that are key components of fisheries. We describe several categories of analytical methods (statistical modelling, network analysis, dynamic modelling, qualitative analysis and controlled behavioural experiments) and highlight their applications in fisheries research, strengths and limitations, data needs and overall objectives. We then discuss important considerations of a methods portfolio development process, including reflexivity, epistemological and ontological concerns and illustrate these considerations via three case studies. We show that, by expanding their methods portfolios, researchers will be better equipped to study the complex interactions shaping fisheries and contribute to solutions for sustainable fisheries management. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-08 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9546375/ /pubmed/36247348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/faf.12678 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Fish and Fisheries published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Lindkvist, Emilie
Pellowe, Kara E.
Alexander, Steven M.
Drury O'Neill, Elizabeth
Finkbeiner, Elena M.
Girón‐Nava, Alfredo
González‐Mon, Blanca
Johnson, Andrew F.
Pittman, Jeremy
Schill, Caroline
Wijermans, Nanda
Bodin, Örjan
Gelcich, Stefan
Glaser, Marion
Untangling social–ecological interactions: A methods portfolio approach to tackling contemporary sustainability challenges in fisheries
title Untangling social–ecological interactions: A methods portfolio approach to tackling contemporary sustainability challenges in fisheries
title_full Untangling social–ecological interactions: A methods portfolio approach to tackling contemporary sustainability challenges in fisheries
title_fullStr Untangling social–ecological interactions: A methods portfolio approach to tackling contemporary sustainability challenges in fisheries
title_full_unstemmed Untangling social–ecological interactions: A methods portfolio approach to tackling contemporary sustainability challenges in fisheries
title_short Untangling social–ecological interactions: A methods portfolio approach to tackling contemporary sustainability challenges in fisheries
title_sort untangling social–ecological interactions: a methods portfolio approach to tackling contemporary sustainability challenges in fisheries
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/faf.12678
work_keys_str_mv AT lindkvistemilie untanglingsocialecologicalinteractionsamethodsportfolioapproachtotacklingcontemporarysustainabilitychallengesinfisheries
AT pellowekarae untanglingsocialecologicalinteractionsamethodsportfolioapproachtotacklingcontemporarysustainabilitychallengesinfisheries
AT alexanderstevenm untanglingsocialecologicalinteractionsamethodsportfolioapproachtotacklingcontemporarysustainabilitychallengesinfisheries
AT druryoneillelizabeth untanglingsocialecologicalinteractionsamethodsportfolioapproachtotacklingcontemporarysustainabilitychallengesinfisheries
AT finkbeinerelenam untanglingsocialecologicalinteractionsamethodsportfolioapproachtotacklingcontemporarysustainabilitychallengesinfisheries
AT gironnavaalfredo untanglingsocialecologicalinteractionsamethodsportfolioapproachtotacklingcontemporarysustainabilitychallengesinfisheries
AT gonzalezmonblanca untanglingsocialecologicalinteractionsamethodsportfolioapproachtotacklingcontemporarysustainabilitychallengesinfisheries
AT johnsonandrewf untanglingsocialecologicalinteractionsamethodsportfolioapproachtotacklingcontemporarysustainabilitychallengesinfisheries
AT pittmanjeremy untanglingsocialecologicalinteractionsamethodsportfolioapproachtotacklingcontemporarysustainabilitychallengesinfisheries
AT schillcaroline untanglingsocialecologicalinteractionsamethodsportfolioapproachtotacklingcontemporarysustainabilitychallengesinfisheries
AT wijermansnanda untanglingsocialecologicalinteractionsamethodsportfolioapproachtotacklingcontemporarysustainabilitychallengesinfisheries
AT bodinorjan untanglingsocialecologicalinteractionsamethodsportfolioapproachtotacklingcontemporarysustainabilitychallengesinfisheries
AT gelcichstefan untanglingsocialecologicalinteractionsamethodsportfolioapproachtotacklingcontemporarysustainabilitychallengesinfisheries
AT glasermarion untanglingsocialecologicalinteractionsamethodsportfolioapproachtotacklingcontemporarysustainabilitychallengesinfisheries