Cargando…

Classification and Drug Resistance Analysis of Pathogenic Bacteria in Patients with Bacterial Pneumonia in Emergency Intensive Care Unit

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the identification efficiency of metagenome next generation sequencing (mNGS) and traditional methods in detecting pathogens in patients with severe bacterial pneumonia (BP) and further analyze the drug resistance of common pathogens. METHODS: A total of 180 pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yin, Kai, Liu, Ling, Fan, Guofeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36262997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6980091
_version_ 1784805100605145088
author Yin, Kai
Liu, Ling
Fan, Guofeng
author_facet Yin, Kai
Liu, Ling
Fan, Guofeng
author_sort Yin, Kai
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the identification efficiency of metagenome next generation sequencing (mNGS) and traditional methods in detecting pathogens in patients with severe bacterial pneumonia (BP) and further analyze the drug resistance of common pathogens. METHODS: A total of 180 patients with severe BP who were admitted to our hospital from June 2017 to July 2020 were selected as the research objects. Alveolar lavage fluid from the patients were collected, and pathogens were detected by the mNGS technology and traditional etiological detection technology. Common pathogens detected by mNGS were tested for the drug sensitivity test. The difference between mNGS and traditional detection method in the identification of pathogenic bacteria in severe BP patients was compared, and the distribution characteristics and drug resistance of pathogenic bacteria were analyzed. RESULTS: The positive rate of mNGS detection was 92.22%, which was significantly higher than that of the traditional culture method (58.33%, P < 0.05). 347 strains of pathogenic bacteria were detected by mNGS, including 256 strains of Gram-negative bacteria (G(−)), 89 strains of Gram-positive bacteria (G(+)), and 2 strains of fungi. Among G(−) bacteria, Acinetobacter baumannii had higher resistance to piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, imipenem, levofloxacin, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and the lowest resistance to tigecycline. The resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae to piperacillin/tazobactam and ceftazidime was higher. Pseudomonas aeruginosa had low resistance to all the drugs. Escherichia coli had high drug resistance to most drugs, and the drug resistant rates to cefoperazone/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, imipenem, and gentamicin were all more than 50.00%. G(+) bacteria had high resistance to penicillin, azithromycin, amoxicillin and levofloxacin, and amoxicillin and levofloxacin had high resistance, up to 100.00%. CONCLUSION: mNGS has high sensitivity for the identification of pathogenic bacteria in patients with BP. G(−) bacteria were the main pathogens of BP, but both G(−) and G(+) bacteria had high resistance to a variety of antibacterial drugs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9546695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95466952022-10-18 Classification and Drug Resistance Analysis of Pathogenic Bacteria in Patients with Bacterial Pneumonia in Emergency Intensive Care Unit Yin, Kai Liu, Ling Fan, Guofeng Contrast Media Mol Imaging Research Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the identification efficiency of metagenome next generation sequencing (mNGS) and traditional methods in detecting pathogens in patients with severe bacterial pneumonia (BP) and further analyze the drug resistance of common pathogens. METHODS: A total of 180 patients with severe BP who were admitted to our hospital from June 2017 to July 2020 were selected as the research objects. Alveolar lavage fluid from the patients were collected, and pathogens were detected by the mNGS technology and traditional etiological detection technology. Common pathogens detected by mNGS were tested for the drug sensitivity test. The difference between mNGS and traditional detection method in the identification of pathogenic bacteria in severe BP patients was compared, and the distribution characteristics and drug resistance of pathogenic bacteria were analyzed. RESULTS: The positive rate of mNGS detection was 92.22%, which was significantly higher than that of the traditional culture method (58.33%, P < 0.05). 347 strains of pathogenic bacteria were detected by mNGS, including 256 strains of Gram-negative bacteria (G(−)), 89 strains of Gram-positive bacteria (G(+)), and 2 strains of fungi. Among G(−) bacteria, Acinetobacter baumannii had higher resistance to piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, imipenem, levofloxacin, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and the lowest resistance to tigecycline. The resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae to piperacillin/tazobactam and ceftazidime was higher. Pseudomonas aeruginosa had low resistance to all the drugs. Escherichia coli had high drug resistance to most drugs, and the drug resistant rates to cefoperazone/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, imipenem, and gentamicin were all more than 50.00%. G(+) bacteria had high resistance to penicillin, azithromycin, amoxicillin and levofloxacin, and amoxicillin and levofloxacin had high resistance, up to 100.00%. CONCLUSION: mNGS has high sensitivity for the identification of pathogenic bacteria in patients with BP. G(−) bacteria were the main pathogens of BP, but both G(−) and G(+) bacteria had high resistance to a variety of antibacterial drugs. Hindawi 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9546695/ /pubmed/36262997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6980091 Text en Copyright © 2022 Kai Yin et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yin, Kai
Liu, Ling
Fan, Guofeng
Classification and Drug Resistance Analysis of Pathogenic Bacteria in Patients with Bacterial Pneumonia in Emergency Intensive Care Unit
title Classification and Drug Resistance Analysis of Pathogenic Bacteria in Patients with Bacterial Pneumonia in Emergency Intensive Care Unit
title_full Classification and Drug Resistance Analysis of Pathogenic Bacteria in Patients with Bacterial Pneumonia in Emergency Intensive Care Unit
title_fullStr Classification and Drug Resistance Analysis of Pathogenic Bacteria in Patients with Bacterial Pneumonia in Emergency Intensive Care Unit
title_full_unstemmed Classification and Drug Resistance Analysis of Pathogenic Bacteria in Patients with Bacterial Pneumonia in Emergency Intensive Care Unit
title_short Classification and Drug Resistance Analysis of Pathogenic Bacteria in Patients with Bacterial Pneumonia in Emergency Intensive Care Unit
title_sort classification and drug resistance analysis of pathogenic bacteria in patients with bacterial pneumonia in emergency intensive care unit
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36262997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6980091
work_keys_str_mv AT yinkai classificationanddrugresistanceanalysisofpathogenicbacteriainpatientswithbacterialpneumoniainemergencyintensivecareunit
AT liuling classificationanddrugresistanceanalysisofpathogenicbacteriainpatientswithbacterialpneumoniainemergencyintensivecareunit
AT fanguofeng classificationanddrugresistanceanalysisofpathogenicbacteriainpatientswithbacterialpneumoniainemergencyintensivecareunit