Cargando…
Rehabilitative strategies after filtering procedure in glaucoma
Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of non-reversible blindness worldwide, and almost 6 million people are estimated to be impaired visually in advanced stage of glaucoma. Recently, several studies on glaucoma has been focused towards new therapeutic approaches based on mechanisms independent from...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36207353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20191-x |
_version_ | 1784805134939717632 |
---|---|
author | Vingolo, Enzo Maria Casillo, Lorenzo Mecarelli, Giulia Limoli, Paolo Giuseppe |
author_facet | Vingolo, Enzo Maria Casillo, Lorenzo Mecarelli, Giulia Limoli, Paolo Giuseppe |
author_sort | Vingolo, Enzo Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of non-reversible blindness worldwide, and almost 6 million people are estimated to be impaired visually in advanced stage of glaucoma. Recently, several studies on glaucoma has been focused towards new therapeutic approaches based on mechanisms independent from IOP control. Effects of new therapeutic agents, visual psychophysical training, or complementary medications targeting optic pathways today seem to be a relevant and effervescent field of research. The goal of the study is to evaluate in glaucoma patients if a rehabilitative strategy with a biofeedback training with microperimetry may be useful after surgery in recovery visual performance even when visual field defects are present in IOP is well controlled environment. Were enrolled 24 patients (28 eyes) with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) (mean 63 range: 49–75 years) from our Glaucoma Center after filtering surgery. All patients after one months from surgical intervention underwent to a complete ophthalmologic examination: IOP measurement, gonioscopy, visual field and SD-OCT at baseline of RNFL thickness. In some cases, were included in the study both eyes because in POAG frequently clinical conditions are different in each eye, and secondarily new fixation target retinal location (TRL) was chosen based on single eye retinal sensitivity. Best corrected visual acuity was significantly increased after the training from 0.61 to 0.479 (p = 0.00058) with no change in refractive error. After the biofeedback patients presented increased value in Mean retinal sensitivity from 14.91 to 15.96 (p = 0.0078).Fixation stabilitywas improved either according to Fuji classification (increased from 75.1 to 81.3% p = 0.0073) or BCEA value, reduced from 8.7 to 6.0 square degrees (p = 0.013) we noted a marked increase in this parameter with better performances and satisfaction by the patient. RFNL thickness: no change was noted (p = 0.505) in this value as an indicator of disease’s stability. Our data indicate that MP-3 Biofeedback may be a good strategy to reduce the impairment of the Glaucoma Patient. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9546844 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95468442022-10-09 Rehabilitative strategies after filtering procedure in glaucoma Vingolo, Enzo Maria Casillo, Lorenzo Mecarelli, Giulia Limoli, Paolo Giuseppe Sci Rep Article Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of non-reversible blindness worldwide, and almost 6 million people are estimated to be impaired visually in advanced stage of glaucoma. Recently, several studies on glaucoma has been focused towards new therapeutic approaches based on mechanisms independent from IOP control. Effects of new therapeutic agents, visual psychophysical training, or complementary medications targeting optic pathways today seem to be a relevant and effervescent field of research. The goal of the study is to evaluate in glaucoma patients if a rehabilitative strategy with a biofeedback training with microperimetry may be useful after surgery in recovery visual performance even when visual field defects are present in IOP is well controlled environment. Were enrolled 24 patients (28 eyes) with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) (mean 63 range: 49–75 years) from our Glaucoma Center after filtering surgery. All patients after one months from surgical intervention underwent to a complete ophthalmologic examination: IOP measurement, gonioscopy, visual field and SD-OCT at baseline of RNFL thickness. In some cases, were included in the study both eyes because in POAG frequently clinical conditions are different in each eye, and secondarily new fixation target retinal location (TRL) was chosen based on single eye retinal sensitivity. Best corrected visual acuity was significantly increased after the training from 0.61 to 0.479 (p = 0.00058) with no change in refractive error. After the biofeedback patients presented increased value in Mean retinal sensitivity from 14.91 to 15.96 (p = 0.0078).Fixation stabilitywas improved either according to Fuji classification (increased from 75.1 to 81.3% p = 0.0073) or BCEA value, reduced from 8.7 to 6.0 square degrees (p = 0.013) we noted a marked increase in this parameter with better performances and satisfaction by the patient. RFNL thickness: no change was noted (p = 0.505) in this value as an indicator of disease’s stability. Our data indicate that MP-3 Biofeedback may be a good strategy to reduce the impairment of the Glaucoma Patient. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9546844/ /pubmed/36207353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20191-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Vingolo, Enzo Maria Casillo, Lorenzo Mecarelli, Giulia Limoli, Paolo Giuseppe Rehabilitative strategies after filtering procedure in glaucoma |
title | Rehabilitative strategies after filtering procedure in glaucoma |
title_full | Rehabilitative strategies after filtering procedure in glaucoma |
title_fullStr | Rehabilitative strategies after filtering procedure in glaucoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Rehabilitative strategies after filtering procedure in glaucoma |
title_short | Rehabilitative strategies after filtering procedure in glaucoma |
title_sort | rehabilitative strategies after filtering procedure in glaucoma |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36207353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20191-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vingoloenzomaria rehabilitativestrategiesafterfilteringprocedureinglaucoma AT casillolorenzo rehabilitativestrategiesafterfilteringprocedureinglaucoma AT mecarelligiulia rehabilitativestrategiesafterfilteringprocedureinglaucoma AT limolipaologiuseppe rehabilitativestrategiesafterfilteringprocedureinglaucoma |