Cargando…
Rating scales to measure adverse effects of medications in people with intellectual disability: a scoping review
PURPOSE: Intellectual disability (ID) is a chronic neurodevelopmental condition characterised by limitations in intelligence and adaptive skills with an onset prior to the age of 18 years. People with ID have complex healthcare needs and are more likely than the general population to experience mult...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-022-03375-2 |
_version_ | 1784805167229566976 |
---|---|
author | Kelly, Neasa Kilmartin, Andrew Lannon, Kevin Lee, Caren McLoughlin, Rory Mulvanny, Lara Mohamed, Omnyiah Treacy, Mairead Rossi, Karen O’Connell, Juliette |
author_facet | Kelly, Neasa Kilmartin, Andrew Lannon, Kevin Lee, Caren McLoughlin, Rory Mulvanny, Lara Mohamed, Omnyiah Treacy, Mairead Rossi, Karen O’Connell, Juliette |
author_sort | Kelly, Neasa |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Intellectual disability (ID) is a chronic neurodevelopmental condition characterised by limitations in intelligence and adaptive skills with an onset prior to the age of 18 years. People with ID have complex healthcare needs and are more likely than the general population to experience multiple comorbidities and polypharmacy, with subsequent increased risk of adverse medication effects. The aim of this scoping review is to characterise rating scales used to measure adverse effects of medication in people with ID. METHODS: Four online databases (PsycINFO, Medline, Web of Science and OpenGrey) were searched in April 2020. Studies were assessed for inclusion against pre-specified eligibility criteria. Reference lists of included studies were hand searched. Data extraction was carried out by two independent reviewers and key findings were tabulated for consideration. Studies were assessed for quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS: The search resulted in 512 unique records, of which fifteen met the inclusion criteria. Fourteen scales were identified. All scales assessed adverse effects of psychotropics only. Of the scales, only one, the Matson Evaluation of Drug Side Effects, which focuses on psychotropic medications, was originally developed for use in a population with ID. CONCLUSION: The Matson Evaluation of Drug Side Effects scale appears to be the most reliable and well-researched scale in people with ID. However, a scale which measures adverse effects across multiple medication classes would be valuable for use in this population. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00228-022-03375-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9546988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95469882022-10-09 Rating scales to measure adverse effects of medications in people with intellectual disability: a scoping review Kelly, Neasa Kilmartin, Andrew Lannon, Kevin Lee, Caren McLoughlin, Rory Mulvanny, Lara Mohamed, Omnyiah Treacy, Mairead Rossi, Karen O’Connell, Juliette Eur J Clin Pharmacol Review PURPOSE: Intellectual disability (ID) is a chronic neurodevelopmental condition characterised by limitations in intelligence and adaptive skills with an onset prior to the age of 18 years. People with ID have complex healthcare needs and are more likely than the general population to experience multiple comorbidities and polypharmacy, with subsequent increased risk of adverse medication effects. The aim of this scoping review is to characterise rating scales used to measure adverse effects of medication in people with ID. METHODS: Four online databases (PsycINFO, Medline, Web of Science and OpenGrey) were searched in April 2020. Studies were assessed for inclusion against pre-specified eligibility criteria. Reference lists of included studies were hand searched. Data extraction was carried out by two independent reviewers and key findings were tabulated for consideration. Studies were assessed for quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS: The search resulted in 512 unique records, of which fifteen met the inclusion criteria. Fourteen scales were identified. All scales assessed adverse effects of psychotropics only. Of the scales, only one, the Matson Evaluation of Drug Side Effects, which focuses on psychotropic medications, was originally developed for use in a population with ID. CONCLUSION: The Matson Evaluation of Drug Side Effects scale appears to be the most reliable and well-researched scale in people with ID. However, a scale which measures adverse effects across multiple medication classes would be valuable for use in this population. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00228-022-03375-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-08-31 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9546988/ /pubmed/36042024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-022-03375-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Kelly, Neasa Kilmartin, Andrew Lannon, Kevin Lee, Caren McLoughlin, Rory Mulvanny, Lara Mohamed, Omnyiah Treacy, Mairead Rossi, Karen O’Connell, Juliette Rating scales to measure adverse effects of medications in people with intellectual disability: a scoping review |
title | Rating scales to measure adverse effects of medications in people with intellectual disability: a scoping review |
title_full | Rating scales to measure adverse effects of medications in people with intellectual disability: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Rating scales to measure adverse effects of medications in people with intellectual disability: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Rating scales to measure adverse effects of medications in people with intellectual disability: a scoping review |
title_short | Rating scales to measure adverse effects of medications in people with intellectual disability: a scoping review |
title_sort | rating scales to measure adverse effects of medications in people with intellectual disability: a scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9546988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-022-03375-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kellyneasa ratingscalestomeasureadverseeffectsofmedicationsinpeoplewithintellectualdisabilityascopingreview AT kilmartinandrew ratingscalestomeasureadverseeffectsofmedicationsinpeoplewithintellectualdisabilityascopingreview AT lannonkevin ratingscalestomeasureadverseeffectsofmedicationsinpeoplewithintellectualdisabilityascopingreview AT leecaren ratingscalestomeasureadverseeffectsofmedicationsinpeoplewithintellectualdisabilityascopingreview AT mcloughlinrory ratingscalestomeasureadverseeffectsofmedicationsinpeoplewithintellectualdisabilityascopingreview AT mulvannylara ratingscalestomeasureadverseeffectsofmedicationsinpeoplewithintellectualdisabilityascopingreview AT mohamedomnyiah ratingscalestomeasureadverseeffectsofmedicationsinpeoplewithintellectualdisabilityascopingreview AT treacymairead ratingscalestomeasureadverseeffectsofmedicationsinpeoplewithintellectualdisabilityascopingreview AT rossikaren ratingscalestomeasureadverseeffectsofmedicationsinpeoplewithintellectualdisabilityascopingreview AT oconnelljuliette ratingscalestomeasureadverseeffectsofmedicationsinpeoplewithintellectualdisabilityascopingreview |