Cargando…

The effect of EMG magnitude on the masseter vestibular evoked myogenic potential (mVEMP)

INTRODUCTION: The masseter vestibular evoked myogenic potential (mVEMP) is a bilaterally generated, electromyographically (EMG)-mediated response innervated by the trigeminal nerve. The purpose of the present investigation was to 1) determine whether subjects could accurately achieve and maintain a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Romero, Daniel J., Jacobson, Gary P., Roberts, Richard A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chinese PLA General Hospital 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9547109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joto.2022.06.004
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: The masseter vestibular evoked myogenic potential (mVEMP) is a bilaterally generated, electromyographically (EMG)-mediated response innervated by the trigeminal nerve. The purpose of the present investigation was to 1) determine whether subjects could accurately achieve and maintain a range of EMG target levels, 2) to examine the effects of varied EMG levels on the latencies and amplitudes of the mVEMP, and 3) to investigate the degree of side-to-side asymmetry and any effects of EMG activation. METHODS: Subjects were nine neurologically and otologically normal young adults. A high-intensity tone burst was presented monaurally while subjects were seated upright and asked to match a range of EMG target levels by clenching their teeth. Recordings were made from the ipsilateral and contralateral masseter muscles referenced to the ear being monaurally stimulated. RESULTS: We found that the tonic EMG target had no effect on mVEMP latency. Additionally, although mVEMP amplitudes “scaled” to the EMG target, there was a tendency for the subjects’ EMG level to “undershoot” the EMG target levels greater than 50 μV. While some individuals did generate differences in EMG activation between sides, there were no significant differences on average EMG activation between sides. Further, while average corrected amplitude asymmetry was similar across EMG targets, some individuals demonstrated large, corrected amplitude asymmetry ratios. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this investigation suggest that, as with cVEMP recordings, the underlying EMG activation may vary between subjects and could impact mVEMP amplitudes, yet could be mitigated by amplitude correction techniques. Further it is important to be aware that even young normal subjects have difficulty maintaining large, tonic EMG activity during the mVEMP recording.