Cargando…

The Prevalence of Idiopathic or Inherited Isolated Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

BACKGROUND: A systematic review of epidemiological studies of primary dystonia from 1985 and 2010 found an overall prevalence of 16.43 per 100,000 (95% CI = 12.09–22.32). METHODS: We performed a systematic review of studies from 2010 and 2022 to determine if there are important differences in epidem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Medina, Alex, Nilles, Christelle, Martino, Davide, Pelletier, Catherine, Pringsheim, Tamara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9547134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.13524
_version_ 1784805198080770048
author Medina, Alex
Nilles, Christelle
Martino, Davide
Pelletier, Catherine
Pringsheim, Tamara
author_facet Medina, Alex
Nilles, Christelle
Martino, Davide
Pelletier, Catherine
Pringsheim, Tamara
author_sort Medina, Alex
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A systematic review of epidemiological studies of primary dystonia from 1985 and 2010 found an overall prevalence of 16.43 per 100,000 (95% CI = 12.09–22.32). METHODS: We performed a systematic review of studies from 2010 and 2022 to determine if there are important differences in epidemiology between these time periods. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included. Incidence of cervical dystonia, blepharospasm, and oromandibular dystonia were each reported in one study; one study reported incidence for all adult onset idiopathic focal dystonias combined. Using data from 11 studies, we performed random effects meta‐analyses of the prevalence of cervical dystonia (9.95 per 100,000; 95% CI = 3.51–28.17), blepharospasm (2.82 per 100,000; 95% CI = 1.12–7.12), laryngeal dystonia (0.40 per 100,000; 95% CI = 0.09–1.83), upper limb dystonia (1.27 per 100,000; 95% CI = 0.36–4.52), oromandibular dystonia (0.57 per 100,000; 95% CI = 0.15–2.15), and idiopathic or inherited isolated dystonia all subtypes combined (30.85 per 100,000; 95% CI = 5.06–187.74). All studies reported more cases of dystonia in females. There was no significant difference in prevalence by subgroup analysis based on time of study publication (1985–2010 vs. 2010–2022). Subgroup analysis of differences in prevalence by dystonia subtype by continent using all studies published (1985–2022) revealed significant regional differences in the prevalence of cervical and laryngeal dystonia. CONCLUSION: The incidence and prevalence of idiopathic or inherited isolated dystonia in the last decade was not significantly different from earlier reports. Population‐based studies across multiple geographic areas are needed to obtain a clearer understanding of the epidemiology of this condition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9547134
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95471342022-10-14 The Prevalence of Idiopathic or Inherited Isolated Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Medina, Alex Nilles, Christelle Martino, Davide Pelletier, Catherine Pringsheim, Tamara Mov Disord Clin Pract Reviews BACKGROUND: A systematic review of epidemiological studies of primary dystonia from 1985 and 2010 found an overall prevalence of 16.43 per 100,000 (95% CI = 12.09–22.32). METHODS: We performed a systematic review of studies from 2010 and 2022 to determine if there are important differences in epidemiology between these time periods. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included. Incidence of cervical dystonia, blepharospasm, and oromandibular dystonia were each reported in one study; one study reported incidence for all adult onset idiopathic focal dystonias combined. Using data from 11 studies, we performed random effects meta‐analyses of the prevalence of cervical dystonia (9.95 per 100,000; 95% CI = 3.51–28.17), blepharospasm (2.82 per 100,000; 95% CI = 1.12–7.12), laryngeal dystonia (0.40 per 100,000; 95% CI = 0.09–1.83), upper limb dystonia (1.27 per 100,000; 95% CI = 0.36–4.52), oromandibular dystonia (0.57 per 100,000; 95% CI = 0.15–2.15), and idiopathic or inherited isolated dystonia all subtypes combined (30.85 per 100,000; 95% CI = 5.06–187.74). All studies reported more cases of dystonia in females. There was no significant difference in prevalence by subgroup analysis based on time of study publication (1985–2010 vs. 2010–2022). Subgroup analysis of differences in prevalence by dystonia subtype by continent using all studies published (1985–2022) revealed significant regional differences in the prevalence of cervical and laryngeal dystonia. CONCLUSION: The incidence and prevalence of idiopathic or inherited isolated dystonia in the last decade was not significantly different from earlier reports. Population‐based studies across multiple geographic areas are needed to obtain a clearer understanding of the epidemiology of this condition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9547134/ /pubmed/36247920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.13524 Text en © 2022 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. Reproduced with the permission of the Minister of Public Health Agency of Canada. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Medina, Alex
Nilles, Christelle
Martino, Davide
Pelletier, Catherine
Pringsheim, Tamara
The Prevalence of Idiopathic or Inherited Isolated Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title The Prevalence of Idiopathic or Inherited Isolated Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full The Prevalence of Idiopathic or Inherited Isolated Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_fullStr The Prevalence of Idiopathic or Inherited Isolated Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Prevalence of Idiopathic or Inherited Isolated Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_short The Prevalence of Idiopathic or Inherited Isolated Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_sort prevalence of idiopathic or inherited isolated dystonia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9547134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.13524
work_keys_str_mv AT medinaalex theprevalenceofidiopathicorinheritedisolateddystoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nilleschristelle theprevalenceofidiopathicorinheritedisolateddystoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT martinodavide theprevalenceofidiopathicorinheritedisolateddystoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pelletiercatherine theprevalenceofidiopathicorinheritedisolateddystoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pringsheimtamara theprevalenceofidiopathicorinheritedisolateddystoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT medinaalex prevalenceofidiopathicorinheritedisolateddystoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nilleschristelle prevalenceofidiopathicorinheritedisolateddystoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT martinodavide prevalenceofidiopathicorinheritedisolateddystoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pelletiercatherine prevalenceofidiopathicorinheritedisolateddystoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pringsheimtamara prevalenceofidiopathicorinheritedisolateddystoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis