Cargando…
The Prevalence of Idiopathic or Inherited Isolated Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
BACKGROUND: A systematic review of epidemiological studies of primary dystonia from 1985 and 2010 found an overall prevalence of 16.43 per 100,000 (95% CI = 12.09–22.32). METHODS: We performed a systematic review of studies from 2010 and 2022 to determine if there are important differences in epidem...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9547134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.13524 |
_version_ | 1784805198080770048 |
---|---|
author | Medina, Alex Nilles, Christelle Martino, Davide Pelletier, Catherine Pringsheim, Tamara |
author_facet | Medina, Alex Nilles, Christelle Martino, Davide Pelletier, Catherine Pringsheim, Tamara |
author_sort | Medina, Alex |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A systematic review of epidemiological studies of primary dystonia from 1985 and 2010 found an overall prevalence of 16.43 per 100,000 (95% CI = 12.09–22.32). METHODS: We performed a systematic review of studies from 2010 and 2022 to determine if there are important differences in epidemiology between these time periods. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included. Incidence of cervical dystonia, blepharospasm, and oromandibular dystonia were each reported in one study; one study reported incidence for all adult onset idiopathic focal dystonias combined. Using data from 11 studies, we performed random effects meta‐analyses of the prevalence of cervical dystonia (9.95 per 100,000; 95% CI = 3.51–28.17), blepharospasm (2.82 per 100,000; 95% CI = 1.12–7.12), laryngeal dystonia (0.40 per 100,000; 95% CI = 0.09–1.83), upper limb dystonia (1.27 per 100,000; 95% CI = 0.36–4.52), oromandibular dystonia (0.57 per 100,000; 95% CI = 0.15–2.15), and idiopathic or inherited isolated dystonia all subtypes combined (30.85 per 100,000; 95% CI = 5.06–187.74). All studies reported more cases of dystonia in females. There was no significant difference in prevalence by subgroup analysis based on time of study publication (1985–2010 vs. 2010–2022). Subgroup analysis of differences in prevalence by dystonia subtype by continent using all studies published (1985–2022) revealed significant regional differences in the prevalence of cervical and laryngeal dystonia. CONCLUSION: The incidence and prevalence of idiopathic or inherited isolated dystonia in the last decade was not significantly different from earlier reports. Population‐based studies across multiple geographic areas are needed to obtain a clearer understanding of the epidemiology of this condition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9547134 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95471342022-10-14 The Prevalence of Idiopathic or Inherited Isolated Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Medina, Alex Nilles, Christelle Martino, Davide Pelletier, Catherine Pringsheim, Tamara Mov Disord Clin Pract Reviews BACKGROUND: A systematic review of epidemiological studies of primary dystonia from 1985 and 2010 found an overall prevalence of 16.43 per 100,000 (95% CI = 12.09–22.32). METHODS: We performed a systematic review of studies from 2010 and 2022 to determine if there are important differences in epidemiology between these time periods. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included. Incidence of cervical dystonia, blepharospasm, and oromandibular dystonia were each reported in one study; one study reported incidence for all adult onset idiopathic focal dystonias combined. Using data from 11 studies, we performed random effects meta‐analyses of the prevalence of cervical dystonia (9.95 per 100,000; 95% CI = 3.51–28.17), blepharospasm (2.82 per 100,000; 95% CI = 1.12–7.12), laryngeal dystonia (0.40 per 100,000; 95% CI = 0.09–1.83), upper limb dystonia (1.27 per 100,000; 95% CI = 0.36–4.52), oromandibular dystonia (0.57 per 100,000; 95% CI = 0.15–2.15), and idiopathic or inherited isolated dystonia all subtypes combined (30.85 per 100,000; 95% CI = 5.06–187.74). All studies reported more cases of dystonia in females. There was no significant difference in prevalence by subgroup analysis based on time of study publication (1985–2010 vs. 2010–2022). Subgroup analysis of differences in prevalence by dystonia subtype by continent using all studies published (1985–2022) revealed significant regional differences in the prevalence of cervical and laryngeal dystonia. CONCLUSION: The incidence and prevalence of idiopathic or inherited isolated dystonia in the last decade was not significantly different from earlier reports. Population‐based studies across multiple geographic areas are needed to obtain a clearer understanding of the epidemiology of this condition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9547134/ /pubmed/36247920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.13524 Text en © 2022 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. Reproduced with the permission of the Minister of Public Health Agency of Canada. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Medina, Alex Nilles, Christelle Martino, Davide Pelletier, Catherine Pringsheim, Tamara The Prevalence of Idiopathic or Inherited Isolated Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis |
title | The Prevalence of Idiopathic or Inherited Isolated Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis |
title_full | The Prevalence of Idiopathic or Inherited Isolated Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis |
title_fullStr | The Prevalence of Idiopathic or Inherited Isolated Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Prevalence of Idiopathic or Inherited Isolated Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis |
title_short | The Prevalence of Idiopathic or Inherited Isolated Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis |
title_sort | prevalence of idiopathic or inherited isolated dystonia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9547134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.13524 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT medinaalex theprevalenceofidiopathicorinheritedisolateddystoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT nilleschristelle theprevalenceofidiopathicorinheritedisolateddystoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT martinodavide theprevalenceofidiopathicorinheritedisolateddystoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pelletiercatherine theprevalenceofidiopathicorinheritedisolateddystoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pringsheimtamara theprevalenceofidiopathicorinheritedisolateddystoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT medinaalex prevalenceofidiopathicorinheritedisolateddystoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT nilleschristelle prevalenceofidiopathicorinheritedisolateddystoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT martinodavide prevalenceofidiopathicorinheritedisolateddystoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pelletiercatherine prevalenceofidiopathicorinheritedisolateddystoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pringsheimtamara prevalenceofidiopathicorinheritedisolateddystoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |