Cargando…
A Multipathogen Bile Sample-based PCR Assay Can Guide Empirical Antimicrobial Strategies in Cholestatic Liver Diseases
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques provide rapid detection of pathogens. This pilot study evaluated the diagnostic utility and clinical impact of multiplex real-time PCR (mRT-PCR, SeptiFast) vs. conventional microbial culture (CMC) in bile samples of patients with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
XIA & HE Publishing Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9547272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36304501 http://dx.doi.org/10.14218/JCTH.2021.00337 |
_version_ | 1784805228663537664 |
---|---|
author | Jahn, Michael Özçürümez, Mustafa K Dolff, Sebastian Rohn, Hana Heider, Dominik Dechêne, Alexander Canbay, Ali Rath, Peter M. Katsounas, Antonios |
author_facet | Jahn, Michael Özçürümez, Mustafa K Dolff, Sebastian Rohn, Hana Heider, Dominik Dechêne, Alexander Canbay, Ali Rath, Peter M. Katsounas, Antonios |
author_sort | Jahn, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques provide rapid detection of pathogens. This pilot study evaluated the diagnostic utility and clinical impact of multiplex real-time PCR (mRT-PCR, SeptiFast) vs. conventional microbial culture (CMC) in bile samples of patients with chronic cholestatic liver diseases (cCLDs), endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP), and peri-interventional-antimicrobial-prophylaxis (pAP). METHODS: We prospectively collected bile samples from 26 patients for microbiological analysis by CMC and mRT-PCR. Concordance of the results of both methods was determined by Krippendorff's alpha (α) for inter-rater reliability and the Jaccard index of similarity. RESULTS: mRT-PCR(bile) and CMC(bile) results were concordant for only Candida albicans (α=0.8406; Jaccard index=0.8181). mRT-PCR(bile) detected pathogens in 8/8 cases (100%), CMC(bile) in 7/8 (87.5%), and CMC(blood) in 5/8 (62.5%) with clinical signs of infection. mRT-PCR(bile), CMC(bile), and CMC(blood) had identical detection results in 3/8 (37.5%) with clinical signs of infection (two Klebsiella spp. and one Enterococcus faecium). The total pathogen count was significantly higher with mRT-PCR(bile) than with CMC(bile) (62 vs. 31; χ(2)=30.031, p<0.001). However, pathogens detected by mRT-PCR(bile) were more often susceptible to pAP according to the patient infection/colonization history (PI/CH) and surveillance data for antibiotic resistance in our clinic (DARC). Pathogens identified by mRT-PCR(bile) and resistant to pAP by PI/CH and DARC were likely to be clinically relevant. CONCLUSIONS: mRT-PCR in conjunction with CMCs for bile analysis increased diagnostic sensitivity and may benefit infection management in patients with cholestatic diseases. Implementation of mRT-PCR in a bile sample-based diagnostic routine can support more rapid and targeted use of antimicrobial agents in cCLD-patients undergoing ERCP and reduce the rate/length of unnecessary administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9547272 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | XIA & HE Publishing Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95472722022-10-26 A Multipathogen Bile Sample-based PCR Assay Can Guide Empirical Antimicrobial Strategies in Cholestatic Liver Diseases Jahn, Michael Özçürümez, Mustafa K Dolff, Sebastian Rohn, Hana Heider, Dominik Dechêne, Alexander Canbay, Ali Rath, Peter M. Katsounas, Antonios J Clin Transl Hepatol Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques provide rapid detection of pathogens. This pilot study evaluated the diagnostic utility and clinical impact of multiplex real-time PCR (mRT-PCR, SeptiFast) vs. conventional microbial culture (CMC) in bile samples of patients with chronic cholestatic liver diseases (cCLDs), endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP), and peri-interventional-antimicrobial-prophylaxis (pAP). METHODS: We prospectively collected bile samples from 26 patients for microbiological analysis by CMC and mRT-PCR. Concordance of the results of both methods was determined by Krippendorff's alpha (α) for inter-rater reliability and the Jaccard index of similarity. RESULTS: mRT-PCR(bile) and CMC(bile) results were concordant for only Candida albicans (α=0.8406; Jaccard index=0.8181). mRT-PCR(bile) detected pathogens in 8/8 cases (100%), CMC(bile) in 7/8 (87.5%), and CMC(blood) in 5/8 (62.5%) with clinical signs of infection. mRT-PCR(bile), CMC(bile), and CMC(blood) had identical detection results in 3/8 (37.5%) with clinical signs of infection (two Klebsiella spp. and one Enterococcus faecium). The total pathogen count was significantly higher with mRT-PCR(bile) than with CMC(bile) (62 vs. 31; χ(2)=30.031, p<0.001). However, pathogens detected by mRT-PCR(bile) were more often susceptible to pAP according to the patient infection/colonization history (PI/CH) and surveillance data for antibiotic resistance in our clinic (DARC). Pathogens identified by mRT-PCR(bile) and resistant to pAP by PI/CH and DARC were likely to be clinically relevant. CONCLUSIONS: mRT-PCR in conjunction with CMCs for bile analysis increased diagnostic sensitivity and may benefit infection management in patients with cholestatic diseases. Implementation of mRT-PCR in a bile sample-based diagnostic routine can support more rapid and targeted use of antimicrobial agents in cCLD-patients undergoing ERCP and reduce the rate/length of unnecessary administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics. XIA & HE Publishing Inc. 2022-10-28 2022-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9547272/ /pubmed/36304501 http://dx.doi.org/10.14218/JCTH.2021.00337 Text en © 2022 Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jahn, Michael Özçürümez, Mustafa K Dolff, Sebastian Rohn, Hana Heider, Dominik Dechêne, Alexander Canbay, Ali Rath, Peter M. Katsounas, Antonios A Multipathogen Bile Sample-based PCR Assay Can Guide Empirical Antimicrobial Strategies in Cholestatic Liver Diseases |
title | A Multipathogen Bile Sample-based PCR Assay Can Guide Empirical Antimicrobial Strategies in Cholestatic Liver Diseases |
title_full | A Multipathogen Bile Sample-based PCR Assay Can Guide Empirical Antimicrobial Strategies in Cholestatic Liver Diseases |
title_fullStr | A Multipathogen Bile Sample-based PCR Assay Can Guide Empirical Antimicrobial Strategies in Cholestatic Liver Diseases |
title_full_unstemmed | A Multipathogen Bile Sample-based PCR Assay Can Guide Empirical Antimicrobial Strategies in Cholestatic Liver Diseases |
title_short | A Multipathogen Bile Sample-based PCR Assay Can Guide Empirical Antimicrobial Strategies in Cholestatic Liver Diseases |
title_sort | multipathogen bile sample-based pcr assay can guide empirical antimicrobial strategies in cholestatic liver diseases |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9547272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36304501 http://dx.doi.org/10.14218/JCTH.2021.00337 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jahnmichael amultipathogenbilesamplebasedpcrassaycanguideempiricalantimicrobialstrategiesincholestaticliverdiseases AT ozcurumezmustafak amultipathogenbilesamplebasedpcrassaycanguideempiricalantimicrobialstrategiesincholestaticliverdiseases AT dolffsebastian amultipathogenbilesamplebasedpcrassaycanguideempiricalantimicrobialstrategiesincholestaticliverdiseases AT rohnhana amultipathogenbilesamplebasedpcrassaycanguideempiricalantimicrobialstrategiesincholestaticliverdiseases AT heiderdominik amultipathogenbilesamplebasedpcrassaycanguideempiricalantimicrobialstrategiesincholestaticliverdiseases AT dechenealexander amultipathogenbilesamplebasedpcrassaycanguideempiricalantimicrobialstrategiesincholestaticliverdiseases AT canbayali amultipathogenbilesamplebasedpcrassaycanguideempiricalantimicrobialstrategiesincholestaticliverdiseases AT rathpeterm amultipathogenbilesamplebasedpcrassaycanguideempiricalantimicrobialstrategiesincholestaticliverdiseases AT katsounasantonios amultipathogenbilesamplebasedpcrassaycanguideempiricalantimicrobialstrategiesincholestaticliverdiseases AT jahnmichael multipathogenbilesamplebasedpcrassaycanguideempiricalantimicrobialstrategiesincholestaticliverdiseases AT ozcurumezmustafak multipathogenbilesamplebasedpcrassaycanguideempiricalantimicrobialstrategiesincholestaticliverdiseases AT dolffsebastian multipathogenbilesamplebasedpcrassaycanguideempiricalantimicrobialstrategiesincholestaticliverdiseases AT rohnhana multipathogenbilesamplebasedpcrassaycanguideempiricalantimicrobialstrategiesincholestaticliverdiseases AT heiderdominik multipathogenbilesamplebasedpcrassaycanguideempiricalantimicrobialstrategiesincholestaticliverdiseases AT dechenealexander multipathogenbilesamplebasedpcrassaycanguideempiricalantimicrobialstrategiesincholestaticliverdiseases AT canbayali multipathogenbilesamplebasedpcrassaycanguideempiricalantimicrobialstrategiesincholestaticliverdiseases AT rathpeterm multipathogenbilesamplebasedpcrassaycanguideempiricalantimicrobialstrategiesincholestaticliverdiseases AT katsounasantonios multipathogenbilesamplebasedpcrassaycanguideempiricalantimicrobialstrategiesincholestaticliverdiseases |