Cargando…

Using Electronic Clinical Decision Support to Examine Vision Rehabilitation Referrals and Practice Guidelines in Ophthalmology

PURPOSE: To examine ophthalmologist use of an electronic health record (EHR)-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) to facilitate low vision rehabilitation (LVR) care referral. METHODS: The CDSS alert was designed to appear when best documented visual acuity was <20/40 or hemianopia or qua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goldstein, Judith E., Guo, Xinxing, Swenor, Bonnielin K., Boland, Michael V., Smith, Kerry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9547361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36180024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.10.8
_version_ 1784805248417660928
author Goldstein, Judith E.
Guo, Xinxing
Swenor, Bonnielin K.
Boland, Michael V.
Smith, Kerry
author_facet Goldstein, Judith E.
Guo, Xinxing
Swenor, Bonnielin K.
Boland, Michael V.
Smith, Kerry
author_sort Goldstein, Judith E.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To examine ophthalmologist use of an electronic health record (EHR)-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) to facilitate low vision rehabilitation (LVR) care referral. METHODS: The CDSS alert was designed to appear when best documented visual acuity was <20/40 or hemianopia or quadrantanopia diagnosis was identified during an ophthalmology encounter from November 6, 2017, to April 5, 2019. Fifteen ophthalmologists representing eight subspecialties from an academic medical center were required to respond to the referral recommendation (order, don't order). LVR referral rates and ophthalmologist user experience were assessed. Encounter characteristics associated with LVR referrals were explored using multilevel logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The alert appeared for 3625 (8.9%) of 40,931 eligible encounters. The referral rate was 14.8% (535/3625). Of the 3413 encounters that met the visual acuity criterion only, patients who were worse than 20/60 were more likely to be referred, and 32.4% of referred patients were between 20/40 and 20/60. Primary reasons for deferring referrals included active medical or surgical treatment, refractive-related issues, and previous connection to LVR services. Eleven of the 13 ophthalmologists agreed that the alert was useful in identifying candidates for LVR services. CONCLUSIONS: A CDSS for patient identification and referral offers an acceptable mechanism to apply practice guidelines and prompt ophthalmologists to facilitate LVR care. Further study is warranted to optimize ophthalmologist user experience while refining alert criteria beyond visual acuity. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The CDSS provides the framework for multi-center research to assess the development of pragmatic algorithms and standards for facilitating LVR care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9547361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95473612022-10-09 Using Electronic Clinical Decision Support to Examine Vision Rehabilitation Referrals and Practice Guidelines in Ophthalmology Goldstein, Judith E. Guo, Xinxing Swenor, Bonnielin K. Boland, Michael V. Smith, Kerry Transl Vis Sci Technol Low Vision Rehabilitation PURPOSE: To examine ophthalmologist use of an electronic health record (EHR)-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) to facilitate low vision rehabilitation (LVR) care referral. METHODS: The CDSS alert was designed to appear when best documented visual acuity was <20/40 or hemianopia or quadrantanopia diagnosis was identified during an ophthalmology encounter from November 6, 2017, to April 5, 2019. Fifteen ophthalmologists representing eight subspecialties from an academic medical center were required to respond to the referral recommendation (order, don't order). LVR referral rates and ophthalmologist user experience were assessed. Encounter characteristics associated with LVR referrals were explored using multilevel logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The alert appeared for 3625 (8.9%) of 40,931 eligible encounters. The referral rate was 14.8% (535/3625). Of the 3413 encounters that met the visual acuity criterion only, patients who were worse than 20/60 were more likely to be referred, and 32.4% of referred patients were between 20/40 and 20/60. Primary reasons for deferring referrals included active medical or surgical treatment, refractive-related issues, and previous connection to LVR services. Eleven of the 13 ophthalmologists agreed that the alert was useful in identifying candidates for LVR services. CONCLUSIONS: A CDSS for patient identification and referral offers an acceptable mechanism to apply practice guidelines and prompt ophthalmologists to facilitate LVR care. Further study is warranted to optimize ophthalmologist user experience while refining alert criteria beyond visual acuity. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The CDSS provides the framework for multi-center research to assess the development of pragmatic algorithms and standards for facilitating LVR care. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9547361/ /pubmed/36180024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.10.8 Text en Copyright 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Low Vision Rehabilitation
Goldstein, Judith E.
Guo, Xinxing
Swenor, Bonnielin K.
Boland, Michael V.
Smith, Kerry
Using Electronic Clinical Decision Support to Examine Vision Rehabilitation Referrals and Practice Guidelines in Ophthalmology
title Using Electronic Clinical Decision Support to Examine Vision Rehabilitation Referrals and Practice Guidelines in Ophthalmology
title_full Using Electronic Clinical Decision Support to Examine Vision Rehabilitation Referrals and Practice Guidelines in Ophthalmology
title_fullStr Using Electronic Clinical Decision Support to Examine Vision Rehabilitation Referrals and Practice Guidelines in Ophthalmology
title_full_unstemmed Using Electronic Clinical Decision Support to Examine Vision Rehabilitation Referrals and Practice Guidelines in Ophthalmology
title_short Using Electronic Clinical Decision Support to Examine Vision Rehabilitation Referrals and Practice Guidelines in Ophthalmology
title_sort using electronic clinical decision support to examine vision rehabilitation referrals and practice guidelines in ophthalmology
topic Low Vision Rehabilitation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9547361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36180024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.10.8
work_keys_str_mv AT goldsteinjudithe usingelectronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoexaminevisionrehabilitationreferralsandpracticeguidelinesinophthalmology
AT guoxinxing usingelectronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoexaminevisionrehabilitationreferralsandpracticeguidelinesinophthalmology
AT swenorbonnielink usingelectronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoexaminevisionrehabilitationreferralsandpracticeguidelinesinophthalmology
AT bolandmichaelv usingelectronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoexaminevisionrehabilitationreferralsandpracticeguidelinesinophthalmology
AT smithkerry usingelectronicclinicaldecisionsupporttoexaminevisionrehabilitationreferralsandpracticeguidelinesinophthalmology