Cargando…
Eligibility screening older research participants using remote cognitive assessment—experiences and reflections from a primary care randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic forced many research teams to adjust the way they conduct studies, including moving to remote delivery of some or all of their recruitment and data collection processes. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is widely used in research and is available in multiple...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9547629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36209240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06805-9 |
_version_ | 1784805306317930496 |
---|---|
author | Brundle, Caroline Heaven, Anne Clegg, Andrew |
author_facet | Brundle, Caroline Heaven, Anne Clegg, Andrew |
author_sort | Brundle, Caroline |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic forced many research teams to adjust the way they conduct studies, including moving to remote delivery of some or all of their recruitment and data collection processes. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is widely used in research and is available in multiple formats for different groups and assessment settings. Here, we reflect on our experiences of administering the MoCA Blind/Telephone as part of the initial telephone eligibility check for participation in a randomised controlled trial with community-dwelling older people with frailty. MAIN BODY: In response to COVID-19, a number of changes were made to the trial’s screening and recruitment procedures, to minimise the amount of time the researchers would spend in the participants’ homes when recruitment began in May 2021. One of the changes was for the researchers to conduct a cognitive assessment for eligibility during an initial telephone call, rather than during the subsequent home visit for consent and baseline data collection. We found that in comparison with conducting the assessment in-person, telephone administration caused uncertainty for the researchers about whether participants were struggling to answer questions due to cognition or hearing impairment. Some participants experienced practical difficulties when combining holding a telephone and completing one of the assessment items. It was hard for the researchers to judge the emotional impact that undertaking the assessment was having on the older people on the telephone, without visual warning signs of fatigue or mood. We discuss the potential impact of these issues on trial recruitment and participant engagement, and the feasibility of videoconferencing as an alternative method of conducting the MoCA. CONCLUSION: The MoCA is a useful tool when cognitive impairment is part of screening and data collection and it is helpful to have the option to use the test remotely. However, as we have found, telephone testing is not always straightforward. Researchers should weigh up the pros and cons for each individual study, especially those involving older adults. If choosing remote methods, consider the practicality of using videoconferencing and think about the possible impact of telephone assessment on the relationship with the (potential) research participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Personalised care planning for older people with frailty ISRCTN16123291 28/08/2020. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9547629 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95476292022-10-10 Eligibility screening older research participants using remote cognitive assessment—experiences and reflections from a primary care randomised controlled trial Brundle, Caroline Heaven, Anne Clegg, Andrew Trials Commentary BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic forced many research teams to adjust the way they conduct studies, including moving to remote delivery of some or all of their recruitment and data collection processes. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is widely used in research and is available in multiple formats for different groups and assessment settings. Here, we reflect on our experiences of administering the MoCA Blind/Telephone as part of the initial telephone eligibility check for participation in a randomised controlled trial with community-dwelling older people with frailty. MAIN BODY: In response to COVID-19, a number of changes were made to the trial’s screening and recruitment procedures, to minimise the amount of time the researchers would spend in the participants’ homes when recruitment began in May 2021. One of the changes was for the researchers to conduct a cognitive assessment for eligibility during an initial telephone call, rather than during the subsequent home visit for consent and baseline data collection. We found that in comparison with conducting the assessment in-person, telephone administration caused uncertainty for the researchers about whether participants were struggling to answer questions due to cognition or hearing impairment. Some participants experienced practical difficulties when combining holding a telephone and completing one of the assessment items. It was hard for the researchers to judge the emotional impact that undertaking the assessment was having on the older people on the telephone, without visual warning signs of fatigue or mood. We discuss the potential impact of these issues on trial recruitment and participant engagement, and the feasibility of videoconferencing as an alternative method of conducting the MoCA. CONCLUSION: The MoCA is a useful tool when cognitive impairment is part of screening and data collection and it is helpful to have the option to use the test remotely. However, as we have found, telephone testing is not always straightforward. Researchers should weigh up the pros and cons for each individual study, especially those involving older adults. If choosing remote methods, consider the practicality of using videoconferencing and think about the possible impact of telephone assessment on the relationship with the (potential) research participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Personalised care planning for older people with frailty ISRCTN16123291 28/08/2020. BioMed Central 2022-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9547629/ /pubmed/36209240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06805-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Brundle, Caroline Heaven, Anne Clegg, Andrew Eligibility screening older research participants using remote cognitive assessment—experiences and reflections from a primary care randomised controlled trial |
title | Eligibility screening older research participants using remote cognitive assessment—experiences and reflections from a primary care randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Eligibility screening older research participants using remote cognitive assessment—experiences and reflections from a primary care randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Eligibility screening older research participants using remote cognitive assessment—experiences and reflections from a primary care randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Eligibility screening older research participants using remote cognitive assessment—experiences and reflections from a primary care randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Eligibility screening older research participants using remote cognitive assessment—experiences and reflections from a primary care randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | eligibility screening older research participants using remote cognitive assessment—experiences and reflections from a primary care randomised controlled trial |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9547629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36209240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06805-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brundlecaroline eligibilityscreeningolderresearchparticipantsusingremotecognitiveassessmentexperiencesandreflectionsfromaprimarycarerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT heavenanne eligibilityscreeningolderresearchparticipantsusingremotecognitiveassessmentexperiencesandreflectionsfromaprimarycarerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cleggandrew eligibilityscreeningolderresearchparticipantsusingremotecognitiveassessmentexperiencesandreflectionsfromaprimarycarerandomisedcontrolledtrial |