Cargando…

Blood loss in total en bloc spondylectomy for primary spinal bone tumours: a comparison of estimated blood loss versus actual blood loss in a single centre over 10 years

BACKGROUND: Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) is a widely accepted surgical technique for primary spinal bone tumours but is frequently accompanied by substantial peri-operative blood loss. Prior studies have reported estimated blood loss (EBL) can reach up to 3,200 mL. The aim of this study is to e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Isabella, Bleibleh, Sabri, Hartley, Laura J., Rehousek, Petr, Hughes, Simon, Grainger, Melvin, Jones, Morgan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9547703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36285091
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jss-22-27
_version_ 1784805321933324288
author Smith, Isabella
Bleibleh, Sabri
Hartley, Laura J.
Rehousek, Petr
Hughes, Simon
Grainger, Melvin
Jones, Morgan
author_facet Smith, Isabella
Bleibleh, Sabri
Hartley, Laura J.
Rehousek, Petr
Hughes, Simon
Grainger, Melvin
Jones, Morgan
author_sort Smith, Isabella
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) is a widely accepted surgical technique for primary spinal bone tumours but is frequently accompanied by substantial peri-operative blood loss. Prior studies have reported estimated blood loss (EBL) can reach up to 3,200 mL. The aim of this study is to estimate the blood loss during TES procedures performed in the last ten years at our tertiary referral centre and compare EBL with actual blood loss (ABL). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all cases managed surgically with TES referred to our centre between 2005 and 2015. We recorded the oncological characteristics of each tumour and surgical management in terms of resection margins, operative duration and instrumentation. Data relating to peri-operative blood loss was also recorded including an estimation of total blood loss, the use of cell salvage where applicable and transfusion rates. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients were found to meet our inclusion criteria. There were 11 men and 10 women, with a median age of 40 years. The mean total ABL was 3,310 mL. Total operation time ranged from 6.53 to 19.7 h. Compared to ABL, in 59% of cases EBL had been underestimated by an average of 78% by volume. The EBL of the remaining 41% cases had been overestimated by 43%. This was not statistically significant (P=0.373). Cell salvage was used in 62% patients with a mean blood loss of 2,845 mL (884–4,939 mL) and transfusion of 3.8 units (0–12 units) versus 4,069 mL (297–8,335 mL) and 9.3 units (0–18 units) in those not managed with cell salvage. There was no significant difference in ABL between the cell salvage and non-cell salvage groups. CONCLUSIONS: We report one of the largest case series in TES for primary bone tumours. EBL is not a reliable predictor for ABL. A large blood loss should be anticipated and use of cell salvage is recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9547703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95477032022-10-24 Blood loss in total en bloc spondylectomy for primary spinal bone tumours: a comparison of estimated blood loss versus actual blood loss in a single centre over 10 years Smith, Isabella Bleibleh, Sabri Hartley, Laura J. Rehousek, Petr Hughes, Simon Grainger, Melvin Jones, Morgan J Spine Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) is a widely accepted surgical technique for primary spinal bone tumours but is frequently accompanied by substantial peri-operative blood loss. Prior studies have reported estimated blood loss (EBL) can reach up to 3,200 mL. The aim of this study is to estimate the blood loss during TES procedures performed in the last ten years at our tertiary referral centre and compare EBL with actual blood loss (ABL). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all cases managed surgically with TES referred to our centre between 2005 and 2015. We recorded the oncological characteristics of each tumour and surgical management in terms of resection margins, operative duration and instrumentation. Data relating to peri-operative blood loss was also recorded including an estimation of total blood loss, the use of cell salvage where applicable and transfusion rates. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients were found to meet our inclusion criteria. There were 11 men and 10 women, with a median age of 40 years. The mean total ABL was 3,310 mL. Total operation time ranged from 6.53 to 19.7 h. Compared to ABL, in 59% of cases EBL had been underestimated by an average of 78% by volume. The EBL of the remaining 41% cases had been overestimated by 43%. This was not statistically significant (P=0.373). Cell salvage was used in 62% patients with a mean blood loss of 2,845 mL (884–4,939 mL) and transfusion of 3.8 units (0–12 units) versus 4,069 mL (297–8,335 mL) and 9.3 units (0–18 units) in those not managed with cell salvage. There was no significant difference in ABL between the cell salvage and non-cell salvage groups. CONCLUSIONS: We report one of the largest case series in TES for primary bone tumours. EBL is not a reliable predictor for ABL. A large blood loss should be anticipated and use of cell salvage is recommended. AME Publishing Company 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9547703/ /pubmed/36285091 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jss-22-27 Text en 2022 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Smith, Isabella
Bleibleh, Sabri
Hartley, Laura J.
Rehousek, Petr
Hughes, Simon
Grainger, Melvin
Jones, Morgan
Blood loss in total en bloc spondylectomy for primary spinal bone tumours: a comparison of estimated blood loss versus actual blood loss in a single centre over 10 years
title Blood loss in total en bloc spondylectomy for primary spinal bone tumours: a comparison of estimated blood loss versus actual blood loss in a single centre over 10 years
title_full Blood loss in total en bloc spondylectomy for primary spinal bone tumours: a comparison of estimated blood loss versus actual blood loss in a single centre over 10 years
title_fullStr Blood loss in total en bloc spondylectomy for primary spinal bone tumours: a comparison of estimated blood loss versus actual blood loss in a single centre over 10 years
title_full_unstemmed Blood loss in total en bloc spondylectomy for primary spinal bone tumours: a comparison of estimated blood loss versus actual blood loss in a single centre over 10 years
title_short Blood loss in total en bloc spondylectomy for primary spinal bone tumours: a comparison of estimated blood loss versus actual blood loss in a single centre over 10 years
title_sort blood loss in total en bloc spondylectomy for primary spinal bone tumours: a comparison of estimated blood loss versus actual blood loss in a single centre over 10 years
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9547703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36285091
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jss-22-27
work_keys_str_mv AT smithisabella bloodlossintotalenblocspondylectomyforprimaryspinalbonetumoursacomparisonofestimatedbloodlossversusactualbloodlossinasinglecentreover10years
AT bleiblehsabri bloodlossintotalenblocspondylectomyforprimaryspinalbonetumoursacomparisonofestimatedbloodlossversusactualbloodlossinasinglecentreover10years
AT hartleylauraj bloodlossintotalenblocspondylectomyforprimaryspinalbonetumoursacomparisonofestimatedbloodlossversusactualbloodlossinasinglecentreover10years
AT rehousekpetr bloodlossintotalenblocspondylectomyforprimaryspinalbonetumoursacomparisonofestimatedbloodlossversusactualbloodlossinasinglecentreover10years
AT hughessimon bloodlossintotalenblocspondylectomyforprimaryspinalbonetumoursacomparisonofestimatedbloodlossversusactualbloodlossinasinglecentreover10years
AT graingermelvin bloodlossintotalenblocspondylectomyforprimaryspinalbonetumoursacomparisonofestimatedbloodlossversusactualbloodlossinasinglecentreover10years
AT jonesmorgan bloodlossintotalenblocspondylectomyforprimaryspinalbonetumoursacomparisonofestimatedbloodlossversusactualbloodlossinasinglecentreover10years