Cargando…

Within‐eye and between‐subject variability for reflectance of the retinal nerve fibre layer

PURPOSE: Reflectance of retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) can contribute to detecting the presence of glaucomatous damage and defining its extent. As a step towards developing a normative database for RNFL reflectance, we assessed within‐eye and between‐subject variability for RNFL reflectance in hea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheung, Hin, Swanson, William H., King, Brett J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9547838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35915921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opo.13027
_version_ 1784805347071885312
author Cheung, Hin
Swanson, William H.
King, Brett J.
author_facet Cheung, Hin
Swanson, William H.
King, Brett J.
author_sort Cheung, Hin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Reflectance of retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) can contribute to detecting the presence of glaucomatous damage and defining its extent. As a step towards developing a normative database for RNFL reflectance, we assessed within‐eye and between‐subject variability for RNFL reflectance in healthy eyes. METHODS: Vertical 30° × 15° volume scans at the optic disc were gathered using SD‐OCT (Spectralis OCT) from people free of eye disease. Scans were gathered for both eyes of 30 younger adults (mean ± SD = 27 ± 3 years) and for one eye of 30 older adults (68 ± 8 years). Reflectance was quantified for each voxel as the depth‐resolved attenuation coefficient (AC). Values for AC were extracted for four slabs (0–52, 24–52, 24–36 and 36–60 μm) and at depths from 24 to 60 μm below the inner limiting membrane (ILM) in 4 μm steps. RESULTS: Between‐subject and within‐eye standard deviations (SDs) for the logarithm of AC were similar; median differences were 0.02–0.03 log unit across all four slabs and depths from 24 to 48 μm. Means for the logarithm of AC were higher for younger than older eyes by ~0.1 log unit; this age effect was not due to differences in the raw reflectance of the RNFL, but rather to age‐related changes in reflectance of deeper retina affecting the calculation of AC. CONCLUSIONS: In both groups, within‐eye variability in RNFL reflectance near the optic disc was similar to between‐subject variability. A better understanding of within‐eye variability would be useful for developing normative databases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9547838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95478382022-11-01 Within‐eye and between‐subject variability for reflectance of the retinal nerve fibre layer Cheung, Hin Swanson, William H. King, Brett J. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Original Articles PURPOSE: Reflectance of retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) can contribute to detecting the presence of glaucomatous damage and defining its extent. As a step towards developing a normative database for RNFL reflectance, we assessed within‐eye and between‐subject variability for RNFL reflectance in healthy eyes. METHODS: Vertical 30° × 15° volume scans at the optic disc were gathered using SD‐OCT (Spectralis OCT) from people free of eye disease. Scans were gathered for both eyes of 30 younger adults (mean ± SD = 27 ± 3 years) and for one eye of 30 older adults (68 ± 8 years). Reflectance was quantified for each voxel as the depth‐resolved attenuation coefficient (AC). Values for AC were extracted for four slabs (0–52, 24–52, 24–36 and 36–60 μm) and at depths from 24 to 60 μm below the inner limiting membrane (ILM) in 4 μm steps. RESULTS: Between‐subject and within‐eye standard deviations (SDs) for the logarithm of AC were similar; median differences were 0.02–0.03 log unit across all four slabs and depths from 24 to 48 μm. Means for the logarithm of AC were higher for younger than older eyes by ~0.1 log unit; this age effect was not due to differences in the raw reflectance of the RNFL, but rather to age‐related changes in reflectance of deeper retina affecting the calculation of AC. CONCLUSIONS: In both groups, within‐eye variability in RNFL reflectance near the optic disc was similar to between‐subject variability. A better understanding of within‐eye variability would be useful for developing normative databases. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-01 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9547838/ /pubmed/35915921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opo.13027 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of College of Optometrists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Cheung, Hin
Swanson, William H.
King, Brett J.
Within‐eye and between‐subject variability for reflectance of the retinal nerve fibre layer
title Within‐eye and between‐subject variability for reflectance of the retinal nerve fibre layer
title_full Within‐eye and between‐subject variability for reflectance of the retinal nerve fibre layer
title_fullStr Within‐eye and between‐subject variability for reflectance of the retinal nerve fibre layer
title_full_unstemmed Within‐eye and between‐subject variability for reflectance of the retinal nerve fibre layer
title_short Within‐eye and between‐subject variability for reflectance of the retinal nerve fibre layer
title_sort within‐eye and between‐subject variability for reflectance of the retinal nerve fibre layer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9547838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35915921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opo.13027
work_keys_str_mv AT cheunghin withineyeandbetweensubjectvariabilityforreflectanceoftheretinalnervefibrelayer
AT swansonwilliamh withineyeandbetweensubjectvariabilityforreflectanceoftheretinalnervefibrelayer
AT kingbrettj withineyeandbetweensubjectvariabilityforreflectanceoftheretinalnervefibrelayer