Cargando…

Time to speed up the diagnostic evaluation in clinically suspected rhinosinusitis patients: A debate on the conventional versus molecular workup to establish fungal infective etiology for prompt management

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Rhinosinusitis (RS) is a clinical and radiological diagnosis that rarely reaches a proper infective etiological diagnosis. The most dreaded fact about invasive fungal rhinosinusitis is its poor prognosis in immunocompromised patients with a 60-80% mortality rate. The present...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Husain, Uneza, Tilak, Ragini, K. Aggarwal, Sushil, Priyadarshi, Ketan, Dhameja, Neeraj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Society of Medical Mycology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9548079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36340434
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/cmm.8.1.9207
_version_ 1784805370097565696
author Husain, Uneza
Tilak, Ragini
K. Aggarwal, Sushil
Priyadarshi, Ketan
Dhameja, Neeraj
author_facet Husain, Uneza
Tilak, Ragini
K. Aggarwal, Sushil
Priyadarshi, Ketan
Dhameja, Neeraj
author_sort Husain, Uneza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Rhinosinusitis (RS) is a clinical and radiological diagnosis that rarely reaches a proper infective etiological diagnosis. The most dreaded fact about invasive fungal rhinosinusitis is its poor prognosis in immunocompromised patients with a 60-80% mortality rate. The present study highlights and compares the various diagnostic techniques to establish a fungal etiological diagnosis in clinically suspected cases of RS from nasal biopsy specimens, with the emphasis on the molecular diagnostic approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included a total of 34 clinically suspected cases of RS who had recently undergone functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS)/biopsy from nasal polyps. Various laboratory methods (microbiological and histopathological) were utilized, including direct microscopic examination of clinical samples and fungal culture isolation. The molecular detection method of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from clinical samples was also explored simultaneously. Serum immunoglobulin-E (IgE) testing of patients was also performed. RESULTS: Out of 34 clinically suspected RS cases, fungal etiology was established in a total of 18 cases, 17 of whom were culture-proven. A total of 15 and 14 culture-proven cases were also detected on direct microscopic examination by potassium hydroxide (KOH) mount and histopathological staining, respectively. One case was additionally identified by molecular method. Aspergillus flavus complex was the most common pathogen isolated in culture. Allergic fungal RS was the most common type, followed by acute and chronic invasive types among all fungal RS cases. CONCLUSION: Accurate and prompt etiological diagnosis of fungal RS is still lagging with fewer options for quick results. Although microscopy and culture isolation can’t be replaced, PCR is a sensitive and specific method that should be incorporated as a supplementary tool for the early diagnosis and management, considering the delayed growth of fungi.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9548079
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Iranian Society of Medical Mycology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95480792022-11-03 Time to speed up the diagnostic evaluation in clinically suspected rhinosinusitis patients: A debate on the conventional versus molecular workup to establish fungal infective etiology for prompt management Husain, Uneza Tilak, Ragini K. Aggarwal, Sushil Priyadarshi, Ketan Dhameja, Neeraj Curr Med Mycol Original Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Rhinosinusitis (RS) is a clinical and radiological diagnosis that rarely reaches a proper infective etiological diagnosis. The most dreaded fact about invasive fungal rhinosinusitis is its poor prognosis in immunocompromised patients with a 60-80% mortality rate. The present study highlights and compares the various diagnostic techniques to establish a fungal etiological diagnosis in clinically suspected cases of RS from nasal biopsy specimens, with the emphasis on the molecular diagnostic approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included a total of 34 clinically suspected cases of RS who had recently undergone functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS)/biopsy from nasal polyps. Various laboratory methods (microbiological and histopathological) were utilized, including direct microscopic examination of clinical samples and fungal culture isolation. The molecular detection method of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from clinical samples was also explored simultaneously. Serum immunoglobulin-E (IgE) testing of patients was also performed. RESULTS: Out of 34 clinically suspected RS cases, fungal etiology was established in a total of 18 cases, 17 of whom were culture-proven. A total of 15 and 14 culture-proven cases were also detected on direct microscopic examination by potassium hydroxide (KOH) mount and histopathological staining, respectively. One case was additionally identified by molecular method. Aspergillus flavus complex was the most common pathogen isolated in culture. Allergic fungal RS was the most common type, followed by acute and chronic invasive types among all fungal RS cases. CONCLUSION: Accurate and prompt etiological diagnosis of fungal RS is still lagging with fewer options for quick results. Although microscopy and culture isolation can’t be replaced, PCR is a sensitive and specific method that should be incorporated as a supplementary tool for the early diagnosis and management, considering the delayed growth of fungi. Iranian Society of Medical Mycology 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9548079/ /pubmed/36340434 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/cmm.8.1.9207 Text en Copyright: © 2021, Published by Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences on behalf of Iranian Society of Medical Mycology and Invasive Fungi Research Center. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Husain, Uneza
Tilak, Ragini
K. Aggarwal, Sushil
Priyadarshi, Ketan
Dhameja, Neeraj
Time to speed up the diagnostic evaluation in clinically suspected rhinosinusitis patients: A debate on the conventional versus molecular workup to establish fungal infective etiology for prompt management
title Time to speed up the diagnostic evaluation in clinically suspected rhinosinusitis patients: A debate on the conventional versus molecular workup to establish fungal infective etiology for prompt management
title_full Time to speed up the diagnostic evaluation in clinically suspected rhinosinusitis patients: A debate on the conventional versus molecular workup to establish fungal infective etiology for prompt management
title_fullStr Time to speed up the diagnostic evaluation in clinically suspected rhinosinusitis patients: A debate on the conventional versus molecular workup to establish fungal infective etiology for prompt management
title_full_unstemmed Time to speed up the diagnostic evaluation in clinically suspected rhinosinusitis patients: A debate on the conventional versus molecular workup to establish fungal infective etiology for prompt management
title_short Time to speed up the diagnostic evaluation in clinically suspected rhinosinusitis patients: A debate on the conventional versus molecular workup to establish fungal infective etiology for prompt management
title_sort time to speed up the diagnostic evaluation in clinically suspected rhinosinusitis patients: a debate on the conventional versus molecular workup to establish fungal infective etiology for prompt management
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9548079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36340434
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/cmm.8.1.9207
work_keys_str_mv AT husainuneza timetospeedupthediagnosticevaluationinclinicallysuspectedrhinosinusitispatientsadebateontheconventionalversusmolecularworkuptoestablishfungalinfectiveetiologyforpromptmanagement
AT tilakragini timetospeedupthediagnosticevaluationinclinicallysuspectedrhinosinusitispatientsadebateontheconventionalversusmolecularworkuptoestablishfungalinfectiveetiologyforpromptmanagement
AT kaggarwalsushil timetospeedupthediagnosticevaluationinclinicallysuspectedrhinosinusitispatientsadebateontheconventionalversusmolecularworkuptoestablishfungalinfectiveetiologyforpromptmanagement
AT priyadarshiketan timetospeedupthediagnosticevaluationinclinicallysuspectedrhinosinusitispatientsadebateontheconventionalversusmolecularworkuptoestablishfungalinfectiveetiologyforpromptmanagement
AT dhamejaneeraj timetospeedupthediagnosticevaluationinclinicallysuspectedrhinosinusitispatientsadebateontheconventionalversusmolecularworkuptoestablishfungalinfectiveetiologyforpromptmanagement