Cargando…

Clinical evaluation of suture materials for transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear

BACKGROUND: There are no recommendations for specific suture materials in transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears using ultrahigh-molecular-weight poly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hiranaka, Takaaki, Furumatsu, Takayuki, Okazaki, Yuki, Kintaka, Keisuke, Kamatsuki, Yusuke, Zhang, Ximing, Xue, Haowei, Hamada, Masanori, Ozaki, Toshifumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9548199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36209256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-022-00167-x
_version_ 1784805393257463808
author Hiranaka, Takaaki
Furumatsu, Takayuki
Okazaki, Yuki
Kintaka, Keisuke
Kamatsuki, Yusuke
Zhang, Ximing
Xue, Haowei
Hamada, Masanori
Ozaki, Toshifumi
author_facet Hiranaka, Takaaki
Furumatsu, Takayuki
Okazaki, Yuki
Kintaka, Keisuke
Kamatsuki, Yusuke
Zhang, Ximing
Xue, Haowei
Hamada, Masanori
Ozaki, Toshifumi
author_sort Hiranaka, Takaaki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are no recommendations for specific suture materials in transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears using ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene sutures and suture tape. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 36 patients (27 women and 9 men, mean age 64.1 years) who had undergone transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears between November 2018 and December 2019. Two groups of 18 patients each received either two different cord-like sutures or suture tape. Clinical parameters were assessed preoperatively and on second-look arthroscopy (mean postoperative period 12 months). The meniscal healing status was assessed using a previously published scoring system (ranging from 0 to 10), and the incidence rate of suture cut-out was assessed on second-look arthroscopy. RESULTS: All clinical scores significantly improved in both groups, with no significant between-group differences on second-look arthroscopy. The arthroscopic meniscal healing scores significantly differed between sutures (mean 6.7 points) and suture tape (mean 7.4 points; p = 0.044). No significant between-group difference in the suture cut-out rate was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no significant differences in the clinical outcomes between ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene sutures and suture tape. Favorable clinical outcomes were obtained using both types of suture; however, the usefulness of suture tape appears to be limited. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43019-022-00167-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9548199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95481992022-10-10 Clinical evaluation of suture materials for transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear Hiranaka, Takaaki Furumatsu, Takayuki Okazaki, Yuki Kintaka, Keisuke Kamatsuki, Yusuke Zhang, Ximing Xue, Haowei Hamada, Masanori Ozaki, Toshifumi Knee Surg Relat Res Research Article BACKGROUND: There are no recommendations for specific suture materials in transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears using ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene sutures and suture tape. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 36 patients (27 women and 9 men, mean age 64.1 years) who had undergone transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears between November 2018 and December 2019. Two groups of 18 patients each received either two different cord-like sutures or suture tape. Clinical parameters were assessed preoperatively and on second-look arthroscopy (mean postoperative period 12 months). The meniscal healing status was assessed using a previously published scoring system (ranging from 0 to 10), and the incidence rate of suture cut-out was assessed on second-look arthroscopy. RESULTS: All clinical scores significantly improved in both groups, with no significant between-group differences on second-look arthroscopy. The arthroscopic meniscal healing scores significantly differed between sutures (mean 6.7 points) and suture tape (mean 7.4 points; p = 0.044). No significant between-group difference in the suture cut-out rate was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no significant differences in the clinical outcomes between ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene sutures and suture tape. Favorable clinical outcomes were obtained using both types of suture; however, the usefulness of suture tape appears to be limited. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43019-022-00167-x. BioMed Central 2022-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9548199/ /pubmed/36209256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-022-00167-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hiranaka, Takaaki
Furumatsu, Takayuki
Okazaki, Yuki
Kintaka, Keisuke
Kamatsuki, Yusuke
Zhang, Ximing
Xue, Haowei
Hamada, Masanori
Ozaki, Toshifumi
Clinical evaluation of suture materials for transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear
title Clinical evaluation of suture materials for transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear
title_full Clinical evaluation of suture materials for transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear
title_fullStr Clinical evaluation of suture materials for transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evaluation of suture materials for transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear
title_short Clinical evaluation of suture materials for transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear
title_sort clinical evaluation of suture materials for transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9548199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36209256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-022-00167-x
work_keys_str_mv AT hiranakatakaaki clinicalevaluationofsuturematerialsfortranstibialpulloutrepairofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottear
AT furumatsutakayuki clinicalevaluationofsuturematerialsfortranstibialpulloutrepairofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottear
AT okazakiyuki clinicalevaluationofsuturematerialsfortranstibialpulloutrepairofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottear
AT kintakakeisuke clinicalevaluationofsuturematerialsfortranstibialpulloutrepairofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottear
AT kamatsukiyusuke clinicalevaluationofsuturematerialsfortranstibialpulloutrepairofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottear
AT zhangximing clinicalevaluationofsuturematerialsfortranstibialpulloutrepairofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottear
AT xuehaowei clinicalevaluationofsuturematerialsfortranstibialpulloutrepairofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottear
AT hamadamasanori clinicalevaluationofsuturematerialsfortranstibialpulloutrepairofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottear
AT ozakitoshifumi clinicalevaluationofsuturematerialsfortranstibialpulloutrepairofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottear