Cargando…

Treatment of impacted or retained second molars with the miniscrew-supported pole technique: a prospective follow-up study

BACKGROUND: Eruption disturbances of permanent molars are uncommon; however, it is important to treat them as soon as they are diagnosed. The main objective was to analyze the effectiveness of the “miniscrew-supported pole technique,” a surgically assisted orthodontic procedure to force the eruption...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lorente, Carmen, Lorente, Pedro, Perez-Vela, Maria, Esquinas, Cristina, Lorente, Teresa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9548456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36210386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-022-00432-5
_version_ 1784805439253250048
author Lorente, Carmen
Lorente, Pedro
Perez-Vela, Maria
Esquinas, Cristina
Lorente, Teresa
author_facet Lorente, Carmen
Lorente, Pedro
Perez-Vela, Maria
Esquinas, Cristina
Lorente, Teresa
author_sort Lorente, Carmen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Eruption disturbances of permanent molars are uncommon; however, it is important to treat them as soon as they are diagnosed. The main objective was to analyze the effectiveness of the “miniscrew-supported pole technique,” a surgically assisted orthodontic procedure to force the eruption of impacted/retained second molars (M2s) when there are indicators of complex molar inclusion. An observational prospective study was carried out during a 2-year period. Sociodemographic, clinical and low-dose scanner variables were taken at baseline (T0). Follow-up variables (T1) were the time between surgery and tooth eruption, radiographic measurements, debonding of buttons, failure rate of miniscrews and success rate of eruption. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients (mean age of 13.9 years) with 24 retained/impacted M2s were recruited; 13 molars were maxillary (54.2%) and 11 (45.8%) were mandibular. Six (25%) were impacted molars and 18 (75%) primarily retained. At T0, molar angulation was mesial in six molars (25%), distal in five molars (20.8%) and 13 molars were vertically positioned (54.2%). Infraocclusion degree was moderate in four (16.7%) molars and severe in 20 (83.3%). Only three (12.5%) third molars were removed due to lack of space. All M2s managed to erupt, achieving a success rate of 100%; however, two molars of the same patient did not achieve occlusion. The period of eruption after surgery was 126.8 (117.3) days. Anatomical radicular alteration was the only variable independently related to a longer time of treatment (p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: The pole technique, using one mesial miniscrew and simple orthodontic mechanics, applies forces that succeed in erupting complicated retained/impacted M2s in a short period of time and with a low failure rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9548456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95484562022-11-14 Treatment of impacted or retained second molars with the miniscrew-supported pole technique: a prospective follow-up study Lorente, Carmen Lorente, Pedro Perez-Vela, Maria Esquinas, Cristina Lorente, Teresa Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: Eruption disturbances of permanent molars are uncommon; however, it is important to treat them as soon as they are diagnosed. The main objective was to analyze the effectiveness of the “miniscrew-supported pole technique,” a surgically assisted orthodontic procedure to force the eruption of impacted/retained second molars (M2s) when there are indicators of complex molar inclusion. An observational prospective study was carried out during a 2-year period. Sociodemographic, clinical and low-dose scanner variables were taken at baseline (T0). Follow-up variables (T1) were the time between surgery and tooth eruption, radiographic measurements, debonding of buttons, failure rate of miniscrews and success rate of eruption. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients (mean age of 13.9 years) with 24 retained/impacted M2s were recruited; 13 molars were maxillary (54.2%) and 11 (45.8%) were mandibular. Six (25%) were impacted molars and 18 (75%) primarily retained. At T0, molar angulation was mesial in six molars (25%), distal in five molars (20.8%) and 13 molars were vertically positioned (54.2%). Infraocclusion degree was moderate in four (16.7%) molars and severe in 20 (83.3%). Only three (12.5%) third molars were removed due to lack of space. All M2s managed to erupt, achieving a success rate of 100%; however, two molars of the same patient did not achieve occlusion. The period of eruption after surgery was 126.8 (117.3) days. Anatomical radicular alteration was the only variable independently related to a longer time of treatment (p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: The pole technique, using one mesial miniscrew and simple orthodontic mechanics, applies forces that succeed in erupting complicated retained/impacted M2s in a short period of time and with a low failure rate. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9548456/ /pubmed/36210386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-022-00432-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Lorente, Carmen
Lorente, Pedro
Perez-Vela, Maria
Esquinas, Cristina
Lorente, Teresa
Treatment of impacted or retained second molars with the miniscrew-supported pole technique: a prospective follow-up study
title Treatment of impacted or retained second molars with the miniscrew-supported pole technique: a prospective follow-up study
title_full Treatment of impacted or retained second molars with the miniscrew-supported pole technique: a prospective follow-up study
title_fullStr Treatment of impacted or retained second molars with the miniscrew-supported pole technique: a prospective follow-up study
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of impacted or retained second molars with the miniscrew-supported pole technique: a prospective follow-up study
title_short Treatment of impacted or retained second molars with the miniscrew-supported pole technique: a prospective follow-up study
title_sort treatment of impacted or retained second molars with the miniscrew-supported pole technique: a prospective follow-up study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9548456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36210386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-022-00432-5
work_keys_str_mv AT lorentecarmen treatmentofimpactedorretainedsecondmolarswiththeminiscrewsupportedpoletechniqueaprospectivefollowupstudy
AT lorentepedro treatmentofimpactedorretainedsecondmolarswiththeminiscrewsupportedpoletechniqueaprospectivefollowupstudy
AT perezvelamaria treatmentofimpactedorretainedsecondmolarswiththeminiscrewsupportedpoletechniqueaprospectivefollowupstudy
AT esquinascristina treatmentofimpactedorretainedsecondmolarswiththeminiscrewsupportedpoletechniqueaprospectivefollowupstudy
AT lorenteteresa treatmentofimpactedorretainedsecondmolarswiththeminiscrewsupportedpoletechniqueaprospectivefollowupstudy