Cargando…

Are patents linked on Twitter? A case study of Google patents

This study attempts to analyze patents as cited/mentioned documents to better understand the interest, dissemination and engagement of these documents in social environments, laying the foundations for social media studies of patents (social Patentometrics).Particularly, this study aims to determine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orduña-Malea, Enrique, Font-Julián, Cristina I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36246789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04519-y
_version_ 1784805574277332992
author Orduña-Malea, Enrique
Font-Julián, Cristina I.
author_facet Orduña-Malea, Enrique
Font-Julián, Cristina I.
author_sort Orduña-Malea, Enrique
collection PubMed
description This study attempts to analyze patents as cited/mentioned documents to better understand the interest, dissemination and engagement of these documents in social environments, laying the foundations for social media studies of patents (social Patentometrics).Particularly, this study aims to determine how patents are disseminated on Twitter by analyzing three elements: tweets linking to patents, users linking to patents, and patents linked from Twitter. To do this, all the tweets containing at least one link to a full-text patent available on Google Patents were collected and analyzed, yielding a total of 126,815 tweets (and 129,001 links) to 86,417 patents. The results evidence an increase of the number of linking tweets over the years, presumably due to the creation of a standardized patent URL ID and the integration of Google Patents and Google Scholar, which took place in 2015. The engagement achieved by these tweets is limited (80.2% of tweets did not attract likes) but increasing notably since 2018. Two super-publisher twitter bot accounts (dailypatent and uspatentbot) are responsible of 53.3% of all the linking tweets, while most accounts are sporadic users linking to patent as part of a conversation. The patents most tweeted are, by far, from United States (87.5% of all links to Google Patents), mainly due to the effect of the two super-publishers. The impact of patents in terms of the number of tweets linking to them is unrelated to their year of publication, status or number of patent citations received, while controversial and media topics might be more determinant factors. However, further research is needed to better understand the topics discussed around patents on Twitter, the users involved, and the metrics attained. Given the increasing number of linking users and linked patents, this study finds Twitter as a relevant source to measure patent-level metrics, shedding light on the impact and interest of patents by the broad public.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9549031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95490312022-10-11 Are patents linked on Twitter? A case study of Google patents Orduña-Malea, Enrique Font-Julián, Cristina I. Scientometrics Article This study attempts to analyze patents as cited/mentioned documents to better understand the interest, dissemination and engagement of these documents in social environments, laying the foundations for social media studies of patents (social Patentometrics).Particularly, this study aims to determine how patents are disseminated on Twitter by analyzing three elements: tweets linking to patents, users linking to patents, and patents linked from Twitter. To do this, all the tweets containing at least one link to a full-text patent available on Google Patents were collected and analyzed, yielding a total of 126,815 tweets (and 129,001 links) to 86,417 patents. The results evidence an increase of the number of linking tweets over the years, presumably due to the creation of a standardized patent URL ID and the integration of Google Patents and Google Scholar, which took place in 2015. The engagement achieved by these tweets is limited (80.2% of tweets did not attract likes) but increasing notably since 2018. Two super-publisher twitter bot accounts (dailypatent and uspatentbot) are responsible of 53.3% of all the linking tweets, while most accounts are sporadic users linking to patent as part of a conversation. The patents most tweeted are, by far, from United States (87.5% of all links to Google Patents), mainly due to the effect of the two super-publishers. The impact of patents in terms of the number of tweets linking to them is unrelated to their year of publication, status or number of patent citations received, while controversial and media topics might be more determinant factors. However, further research is needed to better understand the topics discussed around patents on Twitter, the users involved, and the metrics attained. Given the increasing number of linking users and linked patents, this study finds Twitter as a relevant source to measure patent-level metrics, shedding light on the impact and interest of patents by the broad public. Springer International Publishing 2022-10-10 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9549031/ /pubmed/36246789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04519-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Orduña-Malea, Enrique
Font-Julián, Cristina I.
Are patents linked on Twitter? A case study of Google patents
title Are patents linked on Twitter? A case study of Google patents
title_full Are patents linked on Twitter? A case study of Google patents
title_fullStr Are patents linked on Twitter? A case study of Google patents
title_full_unstemmed Are patents linked on Twitter? A case study of Google patents
title_short Are patents linked on Twitter? A case study of Google patents
title_sort are patents linked on twitter? a case study of google patents
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36246789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04519-y
work_keys_str_mv AT ordunamaleaenrique arepatentslinkedontwitteracasestudyofgooglepatents
AT fontjuliancristinai arepatentslinkedontwitteracasestudyofgooglepatents