Cargando…

A comparison of uni- and multi-variate methods for identifying brain networks activated by cognitive tasks using intracranial EEG

Cognitive tasks are commonly used to identify brain networks involved in the underlying cognitive process. However, inferring the brain networks from intracranial EEG data presents several challenges related to the sparse spatial sampling of the brain and the high variability of the EEG trace due to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donos, Cristian, Blidarescu, Bogdan, Pistol, Constantin, Oane, Irina, Mindruta, Ioana, Barborica, Andrei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36225734
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.946240
_version_ 1784805603078569984
author Donos, Cristian
Blidarescu, Bogdan
Pistol, Constantin
Oane, Irina
Mindruta, Ioana
Barborica, Andrei
author_facet Donos, Cristian
Blidarescu, Bogdan
Pistol, Constantin
Oane, Irina
Mindruta, Ioana
Barborica, Andrei
author_sort Donos, Cristian
collection PubMed
description Cognitive tasks are commonly used to identify brain networks involved in the underlying cognitive process. However, inferring the brain networks from intracranial EEG data presents several challenges related to the sparse spatial sampling of the brain and the high variability of the EEG trace due to concurrent brain processes. In this manuscript, we use a well-known facial emotion recognition task to compare three different ways of analyzing the contrasts between task conditions: permutation cluster tests, machine learning (ML) classifiers, and a searchlight implementation of multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) for intracranial sparse data recorded from 13 patients undergoing presurgical evaluation for drug-resistant epilepsy. Using all three methods, we aim at highlighting the brain structures with significant contrast between conditions. In the absence of ground truth, we use the scientific literature to validate our results. The comparison of the three methods’ results shows moderate agreement, measured by the Jaccard coefficient, between the permutation cluster tests and the machine learning [0.33 and 0.52 for the left (LH) and right (RH) hemispheres], and 0.44 and 0.37 for the LH and RH between the permutation cluster tests and MVPA. The agreement between ML and MVPA is higher: 0.65 for the LH and 0.62 for the RH. To put these results in context, we performed a brief review of the literature and we discuss how each brain structure’s involvement in the facial emotion recognition task.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9549146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95491462022-10-11 A comparison of uni- and multi-variate methods for identifying brain networks activated by cognitive tasks using intracranial EEG Donos, Cristian Blidarescu, Bogdan Pistol, Constantin Oane, Irina Mindruta, Ioana Barborica, Andrei Front Neurosci Neuroscience Cognitive tasks are commonly used to identify brain networks involved in the underlying cognitive process. However, inferring the brain networks from intracranial EEG data presents several challenges related to the sparse spatial sampling of the brain and the high variability of the EEG trace due to concurrent brain processes. In this manuscript, we use a well-known facial emotion recognition task to compare three different ways of analyzing the contrasts between task conditions: permutation cluster tests, machine learning (ML) classifiers, and a searchlight implementation of multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) for intracranial sparse data recorded from 13 patients undergoing presurgical evaluation for drug-resistant epilepsy. Using all three methods, we aim at highlighting the brain structures with significant contrast between conditions. In the absence of ground truth, we use the scientific literature to validate our results. The comparison of the three methods’ results shows moderate agreement, measured by the Jaccard coefficient, between the permutation cluster tests and the machine learning [0.33 and 0.52 for the left (LH) and right (RH) hemispheres], and 0.44 and 0.37 for the LH and RH between the permutation cluster tests and MVPA. The agreement between ML and MVPA is higher: 0.65 for the LH and 0.62 for the RH. To put these results in context, we performed a brief review of the literature and we discuss how each brain structure’s involvement in the facial emotion recognition task. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9549146/ /pubmed/36225734 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.946240 Text en Copyright © 2022 Donos, Blidarescu, Pistol, Oane, Mindruta and Barborica. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Donos, Cristian
Blidarescu, Bogdan
Pistol, Constantin
Oane, Irina
Mindruta, Ioana
Barborica, Andrei
A comparison of uni- and multi-variate methods for identifying brain networks activated by cognitive tasks using intracranial EEG
title A comparison of uni- and multi-variate methods for identifying brain networks activated by cognitive tasks using intracranial EEG
title_full A comparison of uni- and multi-variate methods for identifying brain networks activated by cognitive tasks using intracranial EEG
title_fullStr A comparison of uni- and multi-variate methods for identifying brain networks activated by cognitive tasks using intracranial EEG
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of uni- and multi-variate methods for identifying brain networks activated by cognitive tasks using intracranial EEG
title_short A comparison of uni- and multi-variate methods for identifying brain networks activated by cognitive tasks using intracranial EEG
title_sort comparison of uni- and multi-variate methods for identifying brain networks activated by cognitive tasks using intracranial eeg
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36225734
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.946240
work_keys_str_mv AT donoscristian acomparisonofuniandmultivariatemethodsforidentifyingbrainnetworksactivatedbycognitivetasksusingintracranialeeg
AT blidarescubogdan acomparisonofuniandmultivariatemethodsforidentifyingbrainnetworksactivatedbycognitivetasksusingintracranialeeg
AT pistolconstantin acomparisonofuniandmultivariatemethodsforidentifyingbrainnetworksactivatedbycognitivetasksusingintracranialeeg
AT oaneirina acomparisonofuniandmultivariatemethodsforidentifyingbrainnetworksactivatedbycognitivetasksusingintracranialeeg
AT mindrutaioana acomparisonofuniandmultivariatemethodsforidentifyingbrainnetworksactivatedbycognitivetasksusingintracranialeeg
AT barboricaandrei acomparisonofuniandmultivariatemethodsforidentifyingbrainnetworksactivatedbycognitivetasksusingintracranialeeg
AT donoscristian comparisonofuniandmultivariatemethodsforidentifyingbrainnetworksactivatedbycognitivetasksusingintracranialeeg
AT blidarescubogdan comparisonofuniandmultivariatemethodsforidentifyingbrainnetworksactivatedbycognitivetasksusingintracranialeeg
AT pistolconstantin comparisonofuniandmultivariatemethodsforidentifyingbrainnetworksactivatedbycognitivetasksusingintracranialeeg
AT oaneirina comparisonofuniandmultivariatemethodsforidentifyingbrainnetworksactivatedbycognitivetasksusingintracranialeeg
AT mindrutaioana comparisonofuniandmultivariatemethodsforidentifyingbrainnetworksactivatedbycognitivetasksusingintracranialeeg
AT barboricaandrei comparisonofuniandmultivariatemethodsforidentifyingbrainnetworksactivatedbycognitivetasksusingintracranialeeg