Cargando…
A comparison of uni- and multi-variate methods for identifying brain networks activated by cognitive tasks using intracranial EEG
Cognitive tasks are commonly used to identify brain networks involved in the underlying cognitive process. However, inferring the brain networks from intracranial EEG data presents several challenges related to the sparse spatial sampling of the brain and the high variability of the EEG trace due to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36225734 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.946240 |
_version_ | 1784805603078569984 |
---|---|
author | Donos, Cristian Blidarescu, Bogdan Pistol, Constantin Oane, Irina Mindruta, Ioana Barborica, Andrei |
author_facet | Donos, Cristian Blidarescu, Bogdan Pistol, Constantin Oane, Irina Mindruta, Ioana Barborica, Andrei |
author_sort | Donos, Cristian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cognitive tasks are commonly used to identify brain networks involved in the underlying cognitive process. However, inferring the brain networks from intracranial EEG data presents several challenges related to the sparse spatial sampling of the brain and the high variability of the EEG trace due to concurrent brain processes. In this manuscript, we use a well-known facial emotion recognition task to compare three different ways of analyzing the contrasts between task conditions: permutation cluster tests, machine learning (ML) classifiers, and a searchlight implementation of multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) for intracranial sparse data recorded from 13 patients undergoing presurgical evaluation for drug-resistant epilepsy. Using all three methods, we aim at highlighting the brain structures with significant contrast between conditions. In the absence of ground truth, we use the scientific literature to validate our results. The comparison of the three methods’ results shows moderate agreement, measured by the Jaccard coefficient, between the permutation cluster tests and the machine learning [0.33 and 0.52 for the left (LH) and right (RH) hemispheres], and 0.44 and 0.37 for the LH and RH between the permutation cluster tests and MVPA. The agreement between ML and MVPA is higher: 0.65 for the LH and 0.62 for the RH. To put these results in context, we performed a brief review of the literature and we discuss how each brain structure’s involvement in the facial emotion recognition task. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9549146 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95491462022-10-11 A comparison of uni- and multi-variate methods for identifying brain networks activated by cognitive tasks using intracranial EEG Donos, Cristian Blidarescu, Bogdan Pistol, Constantin Oane, Irina Mindruta, Ioana Barborica, Andrei Front Neurosci Neuroscience Cognitive tasks are commonly used to identify brain networks involved in the underlying cognitive process. However, inferring the brain networks from intracranial EEG data presents several challenges related to the sparse spatial sampling of the brain and the high variability of the EEG trace due to concurrent brain processes. In this manuscript, we use a well-known facial emotion recognition task to compare three different ways of analyzing the contrasts between task conditions: permutation cluster tests, machine learning (ML) classifiers, and a searchlight implementation of multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) for intracranial sparse data recorded from 13 patients undergoing presurgical evaluation for drug-resistant epilepsy. Using all three methods, we aim at highlighting the brain structures with significant contrast between conditions. In the absence of ground truth, we use the scientific literature to validate our results. The comparison of the three methods’ results shows moderate agreement, measured by the Jaccard coefficient, between the permutation cluster tests and the machine learning [0.33 and 0.52 for the left (LH) and right (RH) hemispheres], and 0.44 and 0.37 for the LH and RH between the permutation cluster tests and MVPA. The agreement between ML and MVPA is higher: 0.65 for the LH and 0.62 for the RH. To put these results in context, we performed a brief review of the literature and we discuss how each brain structure’s involvement in the facial emotion recognition task. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9549146/ /pubmed/36225734 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.946240 Text en Copyright © 2022 Donos, Blidarescu, Pistol, Oane, Mindruta and Barborica. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Donos, Cristian Blidarescu, Bogdan Pistol, Constantin Oane, Irina Mindruta, Ioana Barborica, Andrei A comparison of uni- and multi-variate methods for identifying brain networks activated by cognitive tasks using intracranial EEG |
title | A comparison of uni- and multi-variate methods for identifying brain networks activated by cognitive tasks using intracranial EEG |
title_full | A comparison of uni- and multi-variate methods for identifying brain networks activated by cognitive tasks using intracranial EEG |
title_fullStr | A comparison of uni- and multi-variate methods for identifying brain networks activated by cognitive tasks using intracranial EEG |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of uni- and multi-variate methods for identifying brain networks activated by cognitive tasks using intracranial EEG |
title_short | A comparison of uni- and multi-variate methods for identifying brain networks activated by cognitive tasks using intracranial EEG |
title_sort | comparison of uni- and multi-variate methods for identifying brain networks activated by cognitive tasks using intracranial eeg |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36225734 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.946240 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT donoscristian acomparisonofuniandmultivariatemethodsforidentifyingbrainnetworksactivatedbycognitivetasksusingintracranialeeg AT blidarescubogdan acomparisonofuniandmultivariatemethodsforidentifyingbrainnetworksactivatedbycognitivetasksusingintracranialeeg AT pistolconstantin acomparisonofuniandmultivariatemethodsforidentifyingbrainnetworksactivatedbycognitivetasksusingintracranialeeg AT oaneirina acomparisonofuniandmultivariatemethodsforidentifyingbrainnetworksactivatedbycognitivetasksusingintracranialeeg AT mindrutaioana acomparisonofuniandmultivariatemethodsforidentifyingbrainnetworksactivatedbycognitivetasksusingintracranialeeg AT barboricaandrei acomparisonofuniandmultivariatemethodsforidentifyingbrainnetworksactivatedbycognitivetasksusingintracranialeeg AT donoscristian comparisonofuniandmultivariatemethodsforidentifyingbrainnetworksactivatedbycognitivetasksusingintracranialeeg AT blidarescubogdan comparisonofuniandmultivariatemethodsforidentifyingbrainnetworksactivatedbycognitivetasksusingintracranialeeg AT pistolconstantin comparisonofuniandmultivariatemethodsforidentifyingbrainnetworksactivatedbycognitivetasksusingintracranialeeg AT oaneirina comparisonofuniandmultivariatemethodsforidentifyingbrainnetworksactivatedbycognitivetasksusingintracranialeeg AT mindrutaioana comparisonofuniandmultivariatemethodsforidentifyingbrainnetworksactivatedbycognitivetasksusingintracranialeeg AT barboricaandrei comparisonofuniandmultivariatemethodsforidentifyingbrainnetworksactivatedbycognitivetasksusingintracranialeeg |