Cargando…

Predictive model to identify multiple failure to biological therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the wide range of therapies available, there is a percentage of patients whose treatment presents a challenge for clinicians due to lack of response to multiple biologic and target-specific disease-modifying antirheumatic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Novella-Navarro, Marta, Benavent, Diego, Ruiz-Esquide, Virginia, Tornero, Carolina, Díaz-Almirón, Mariana, Chacur, Chafik Alejandro, Peiteado, Diana, Villalba, Alejandro, Sanmartí, Raimon, Plasencia-Rodríguez, Chamaida, Balsa, Alejandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36226311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1759720X221124028
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Despite advances in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the wide range of therapies available, there is a percentage of patients whose treatment presents a challenge for clinicians due to lack of response to multiple biologic and target-specific disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs). OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an algorithm to predict multiple failure to biological therapy in patients with RA. DESIGN: Observational retrospective study involving subjects from a cohort of patients with RA receiving b/tsDMARDs. METHODS: Based on the number of prior failures to b/tsDMARDs, patients were classified as either multi-refractory (MR) or non-refractory (NR). Patient characteristics were considered in the statistical analysis to design the predictive model, selecting those variables with a predictive capability. A decision algorithm known as ‘classification and regression tree’ (CART) was developed to create a prediction model of multi-drug resistance. Performance of the prediction algorithm was evaluated in an external independent cohort using area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 136 patients were included: 51 MR and 85 NR. The CART model was able to predict multiple failures to b/tsDMARDs using disease activity score-28 (DAS-28) values at 6 months after the start time of the initial b/tsDMARD, as well as DAS-28 improvement in the first 6 months and baseline DAS-28. The CART model showed a capability to correctly classify 94.1% NR and 87.5% MR patients with a sensitivity = 0.88, a specificity = 0.94, and an AUC = 0.89 (95% CI: 0.74–1.00). In the external validation cohort, 35 MR and 47 NR patients were included. The AUC value for the CART model in this cohort was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.73–0.9). CONCLUSION: Our model correctly classified NR and MR patients based on simple measurements available in routine clinical practice, which provides the possibility to characterize and individualize patient treatments during early stages.