Cargando…

Interpreting Breast Cancer Mortality Trends Related to Introduction of Mammography Screening: A Simulation Study

Background. Several studies have evaluated the effect of mammography screening on breast cancer mortality based on overall breast cancer mortality trends, with varied conclusions. The statistical power of such trend analyses is, however, not carefully studied. Methods. We estimated how the effect of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heggland, Torunn, Vatten, Lars Johan, Opdahl, Signe, Weedon-Fekjær, Harald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36225967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23814683221131321
_version_ 1784805616729980928
author Heggland, Torunn
Vatten, Lars Johan
Opdahl, Signe
Weedon-Fekjær, Harald
author_facet Heggland, Torunn
Vatten, Lars Johan
Opdahl, Signe
Weedon-Fekjær, Harald
author_sort Heggland, Torunn
collection PubMed
description Background. Several studies have evaluated the effect of mammography screening on breast cancer mortality based on overall breast cancer mortality trends, with varied conclusions. The statistical power of such trend analyses is, however, not carefully studied. Methods. We estimated how the effect of screening on overall breast cancer mortality is likely to unfold. Because a screening effect is based on earlier treatment, screening can affect only new incident cases after screening introduction. To evaluate the likelihood of detecting screening effects on overall breast cancer mortality time trends, we calculated the statistical power of joinpoint regression analysis on breast cancer mortality trends around screening introduction using simulations. Results. We found that a very gradual increase in population-level screening effect is expected due to prescreening incident cases. Assuming 25% effectiveness of a biennial screening program in reducing breast cancer mortality among women 50 to 69 y of age, the expected reduction in overall breast cancer mortality was 3% after 2 y and reached a long-term effect of 18% after 20 y. In common settings, the statistical power to detect any screening effects using joinpoint regression analysis is very low (<50%), even in an artificial setting of constant risk of baseline breast cancer mortality over time. Conclusions. Population effects of screening on breast cancer mortality emerge very gradually and are expected to be considerably lower than the effects reported in trials excluding women diagnosed before screening. Studies of overall breast cancer mortality time trends have too low statistical power to reliably detect screening effects in most populations. Implications. Researchers and policy makers evaluating mammography screening should avoid using breast cancer mortality trend analysis that does not separate pre- and postscreening incident cases. HIGHLIGHTS: Population-level mammography screening effects on breast cancer mortality emerge gradually following screening introduction, resulting in very low statistical power of trend analysis. Researchers and policy makers evaluating mammography screening should avoid relying on population-wide breast cancer mortality trends. Expected mammography screening effects at population level are lower than those from screening trials, as many cases of breast cancer fall outside the screening age range.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9549205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95492052022-10-11 Interpreting Breast Cancer Mortality Trends Related to Introduction of Mammography Screening: A Simulation Study Heggland, Torunn Vatten, Lars Johan Opdahl, Signe Weedon-Fekjær, Harald MDM Policy Pract Original Research Article Background. Several studies have evaluated the effect of mammography screening on breast cancer mortality based on overall breast cancer mortality trends, with varied conclusions. The statistical power of such trend analyses is, however, not carefully studied. Methods. We estimated how the effect of screening on overall breast cancer mortality is likely to unfold. Because a screening effect is based on earlier treatment, screening can affect only new incident cases after screening introduction. To evaluate the likelihood of detecting screening effects on overall breast cancer mortality time trends, we calculated the statistical power of joinpoint regression analysis on breast cancer mortality trends around screening introduction using simulations. Results. We found that a very gradual increase in population-level screening effect is expected due to prescreening incident cases. Assuming 25% effectiveness of a biennial screening program in reducing breast cancer mortality among women 50 to 69 y of age, the expected reduction in overall breast cancer mortality was 3% after 2 y and reached a long-term effect of 18% after 20 y. In common settings, the statistical power to detect any screening effects using joinpoint regression analysis is very low (<50%), even in an artificial setting of constant risk of baseline breast cancer mortality over time. Conclusions. Population effects of screening on breast cancer mortality emerge very gradually and are expected to be considerably lower than the effects reported in trials excluding women diagnosed before screening. Studies of overall breast cancer mortality time trends have too low statistical power to reliably detect screening effects in most populations. Implications. Researchers and policy makers evaluating mammography screening should avoid using breast cancer mortality trend analysis that does not separate pre- and postscreening incident cases. HIGHLIGHTS: Population-level mammography screening effects on breast cancer mortality emerge gradually following screening introduction, resulting in very low statistical power of trend analysis. Researchers and policy makers evaluating mammography screening should avoid relying on population-wide breast cancer mortality trends. Expected mammography screening effects at population level are lower than those from screening trials, as many cases of breast cancer fall outside the screening age range. SAGE Publications 2022-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9549205/ /pubmed/36225967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23814683221131321 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Heggland, Torunn
Vatten, Lars Johan
Opdahl, Signe
Weedon-Fekjær, Harald
Interpreting Breast Cancer Mortality Trends Related to Introduction of Mammography Screening: A Simulation Study
title Interpreting Breast Cancer Mortality Trends Related to Introduction of Mammography Screening: A Simulation Study
title_full Interpreting Breast Cancer Mortality Trends Related to Introduction of Mammography Screening: A Simulation Study
title_fullStr Interpreting Breast Cancer Mortality Trends Related to Introduction of Mammography Screening: A Simulation Study
title_full_unstemmed Interpreting Breast Cancer Mortality Trends Related to Introduction of Mammography Screening: A Simulation Study
title_short Interpreting Breast Cancer Mortality Trends Related to Introduction of Mammography Screening: A Simulation Study
title_sort interpreting breast cancer mortality trends related to introduction of mammography screening: a simulation study
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36225967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23814683221131321
work_keys_str_mv AT hegglandtorunn interpretingbreastcancermortalitytrendsrelatedtointroductionofmammographyscreeningasimulationstudy
AT vattenlarsjohan interpretingbreastcancermortalitytrendsrelatedtointroductionofmammographyscreeningasimulationstudy
AT opdahlsigne interpretingbreastcancermortalitytrendsrelatedtointroductionofmammographyscreeningasimulationstudy
AT weedonfekjærharald interpretingbreastcancermortalitytrendsrelatedtointroductionofmammographyscreeningasimulationstudy