Cargando…

Evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygen

QUESTION ADDRESSED BY STUDY: Administration of aerosol to patients receiving high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) ranges from concurrent aerosol delivery by mouthpiece to aerosol via cannula alone. This study examines the conditions to provide optimal aerosol delivery with low- or high-flow nasal oxygen wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murphy, Barry, Eain, Marc Mac Giolla, Joyce, Mary, Fink, James B., MacLoughlin, Ronan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Respiratory Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36225335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00220-2022
_version_ 1784805642771365888
author Murphy, Barry
Eain, Marc Mac Giolla
Joyce, Mary
Fink, James B.
MacLoughlin, Ronan
author_facet Murphy, Barry
Eain, Marc Mac Giolla
Joyce, Mary
Fink, James B.
MacLoughlin, Ronan
author_sort Murphy, Barry
collection PubMed
description QUESTION ADDRESSED BY STUDY: Administration of aerosol to patients receiving high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) ranges from concurrent aerosol delivery by mouthpiece to aerosol via cannula alone. This study examines the conditions to provide optimal aerosol delivery with low- or high-flow nasal oxygen with concurrent mouthpiece or through nasal cannula alone, and the impact on fugitive aerosols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A vibrating mesh nebuliser delivered salbutamol via mouthpiece, aerosol holding chamber and nasal cannula to an adult head model simulating relaxed breathing. The mean±sd inhaled dose (%) was assayed from a filter distal to the trachea. Optical particle sizers were used to measure fugitive aerosol concentrations during aerosol delivery. RESULTS: Concurrent low-flow nasal oxygen (LFNO) and aerosol delivery with a mouthpiece and aerosol holding chamber increased the inhaled dose (%) available, 31.44±1.33% when supplemented with 2 L·min(−1) of nasal oxygen. Concurrent HFNO above 30 L·min(−1) resulted in a lower inhaled dose (%) compared to aerosol delivered through HFNO alone. The addition of concurrent LFNO or HFNO resulted in no increase in aerosol levels in the test room. ANSWER TO QUESTION POSED: Concurrent LFNO with a mouthpiece and aerosol holding chamber is an effective and safe means of aerosol delivery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9549318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher European Respiratory Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95493182022-10-11 Evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygen Murphy, Barry Eain, Marc Mac Giolla Joyce, Mary Fink, James B. MacLoughlin, Ronan ERJ Open Res Original Research Articles QUESTION ADDRESSED BY STUDY: Administration of aerosol to patients receiving high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) ranges from concurrent aerosol delivery by mouthpiece to aerosol via cannula alone. This study examines the conditions to provide optimal aerosol delivery with low- or high-flow nasal oxygen with concurrent mouthpiece or through nasal cannula alone, and the impact on fugitive aerosols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A vibrating mesh nebuliser delivered salbutamol via mouthpiece, aerosol holding chamber and nasal cannula to an adult head model simulating relaxed breathing. The mean±sd inhaled dose (%) was assayed from a filter distal to the trachea. Optical particle sizers were used to measure fugitive aerosol concentrations during aerosol delivery. RESULTS: Concurrent low-flow nasal oxygen (LFNO) and aerosol delivery with a mouthpiece and aerosol holding chamber increased the inhaled dose (%) available, 31.44±1.33% when supplemented with 2 L·min(−1) of nasal oxygen. Concurrent HFNO above 30 L·min(−1) resulted in a lower inhaled dose (%) compared to aerosol delivered through HFNO alone. The addition of concurrent LFNO or HFNO resulted in no increase in aerosol levels in the test room. ANSWER TO QUESTION POSED: Concurrent LFNO with a mouthpiece and aerosol holding chamber is an effective and safe means of aerosol delivery. European Respiratory Society 2022-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9549318/ /pubmed/36225335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00220-2022 Text en Copyright ©The authors 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org (mailto:permissions@ersnet.org)
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Murphy, Barry
Eain, Marc Mac Giolla
Joyce, Mary
Fink, James B.
MacLoughlin, Ronan
Evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygen
title Evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygen
title_full Evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygen
title_fullStr Evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygen
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygen
title_short Evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygen
title_sort evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygen
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36225335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00220-2022
work_keys_str_mv AT murphybarry evaluationofaerosoldrugdeliverywithconcurrentlowandhighflownasaloxygen
AT eainmarcmacgiolla evaluationofaerosoldrugdeliverywithconcurrentlowandhighflownasaloxygen
AT joycemary evaluationofaerosoldrugdeliverywithconcurrentlowandhighflownasaloxygen
AT finkjamesb evaluationofaerosoldrugdeliverywithconcurrentlowandhighflownasaloxygen
AT macloughlinronan evaluationofaerosoldrugdeliverywithconcurrentlowandhighflownasaloxygen