Cargando…
Evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygen
QUESTION ADDRESSED BY STUDY: Administration of aerosol to patients receiving high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) ranges from concurrent aerosol delivery by mouthpiece to aerosol via cannula alone. This study examines the conditions to provide optimal aerosol delivery with low- or high-flow nasal oxygen wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Respiratory Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36225335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00220-2022 |
_version_ | 1784805642771365888 |
---|---|
author | Murphy, Barry Eain, Marc Mac Giolla Joyce, Mary Fink, James B. MacLoughlin, Ronan |
author_facet | Murphy, Barry Eain, Marc Mac Giolla Joyce, Mary Fink, James B. MacLoughlin, Ronan |
author_sort | Murphy, Barry |
collection | PubMed |
description | QUESTION ADDRESSED BY STUDY: Administration of aerosol to patients receiving high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) ranges from concurrent aerosol delivery by mouthpiece to aerosol via cannula alone. This study examines the conditions to provide optimal aerosol delivery with low- or high-flow nasal oxygen with concurrent mouthpiece or through nasal cannula alone, and the impact on fugitive aerosols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A vibrating mesh nebuliser delivered salbutamol via mouthpiece, aerosol holding chamber and nasal cannula to an adult head model simulating relaxed breathing. The mean±sd inhaled dose (%) was assayed from a filter distal to the trachea. Optical particle sizers were used to measure fugitive aerosol concentrations during aerosol delivery. RESULTS: Concurrent low-flow nasal oxygen (LFNO) and aerosol delivery with a mouthpiece and aerosol holding chamber increased the inhaled dose (%) available, 31.44±1.33% when supplemented with 2 L·min(−1) of nasal oxygen. Concurrent HFNO above 30 L·min(−1) resulted in a lower inhaled dose (%) compared to aerosol delivered through HFNO alone. The addition of concurrent LFNO or HFNO resulted in no increase in aerosol levels in the test room. ANSWER TO QUESTION POSED: Concurrent LFNO with a mouthpiece and aerosol holding chamber is an effective and safe means of aerosol delivery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9549318 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | European Respiratory Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95493182022-10-11 Evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygen Murphy, Barry Eain, Marc Mac Giolla Joyce, Mary Fink, James B. MacLoughlin, Ronan ERJ Open Res Original Research Articles QUESTION ADDRESSED BY STUDY: Administration of aerosol to patients receiving high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) ranges from concurrent aerosol delivery by mouthpiece to aerosol via cannula alone. This study examines the conditions to provide optimal aerosol delivery with low- or high-flow nasal oxygen with concurrent mouthpiece or through nasal cannula alone, and the impact on fugitive aerosols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A vibrating mesh nebuliser delivered salbutamol via mouthpiece, aerosol holding chamber and nasal cannula to an adult head model simulating relaxed breathing. The mean±sd inhaled dose (%) was assayed from a filter distal to the trachea. Optical particle sizers were used to measure fugitive aerosol concentrations during aerosol delivery. RESULTS: Concurrent low-flow nasal oxygen (LFNO) and aerosol delivery with a mouthpiece and aerosol holding chamber increased the inhaled dose (%) available, 31.44±1.33% when supplemented with 2 L·min(−1) of nasal oxygen. Concurrent HFNO above 30 L·min(−1) resulted in a lower inhaled dose (%) compared to aerosol delivered through HFNO alone. The addition of concurrent LFNO or HFNO resulted in no increase in aerosol levels in the test room. ANSWER TO QUESTION POSED: Concurrent LFNO with a mouthpiece and aerosol holding chamber is an effective and safe means of aerosol delivery. European Respiratory Society 2022-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9549318/ /pubmed/36225335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00220-2022 Text en Copyright ©The authors 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org (mailto:permissions@ersnet.org) |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles Murphy, Barry Eain, Marc Mac Giolla Joyce, Mary Fink, James B. MacLoughlin, Ronan Evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygen |
title | Evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygen |
title_full | Evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygen |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygen |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygen |
title_short | Evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygen |
title_sort | evaluation of aerosol drug delivery with concurrent low- and high-flow nasal oxygen |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36225335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00220-2022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murphybarry evaluationofaerosoldrugdeliverywithconcurrentlowandhighflownasaloxygen AT eainmarcmacgiolla evaluationofaerosoldrugdeliverywithconcurrentlowandhighflownasaloxygen AT joycemary evaluationofaerosoldrugdeliverywithconcurrentlowandhighflownasaloxygen AT finkjamesb evaluationofaerosoldrugdeliverywithconcurrentlowandhighflownasaloxygen AT macloughlinronan evaluationofaerosoldrugdeliverywithconcurrentlowandhighflownasaloxygen |