Cargando…

高流量湿化氧疗对单孔胸腔镜下肺叶切除术后患者的疗效分析

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients who underwent lobectomy resection are prone to hypoxemia, and the vast majority present with type Ⅰ respiratory failure. Thus, improvement of hypoxemia is one of the most important factors to facilitate postoperative recovery of patients. In this study, the superio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36172728
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2022.102.38
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients who underwent lobectomy resection are prone to hypoxemia, and the vast majority present with type Ⅰ respiratory failure. Thus, improvement of hypoxemia is one of the most important factors to facilitate postoperative recovery of patients. In this study, the superiority-inferiority of different oxygen inhalation methods were compared with high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNO), noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) and nasal oxygen breath (NOB) in patients with hypoxemia after single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy, and the clinical efficacy of HFNO in these patients was further investigated. METHODS: A total of 180 patients from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University in China with hypoxemia who accepting single-port VATS lobectomy from June 2021 to March 2022 were randomly divided into three groups (n=60), which were treated with HFNO, NIMV and NOB, respectively. The results of arterial blood gas analysis, patient's comfort score and incidence of complications were observed before, 1 h, 6 h-12 h and after use. Statistical analyses were conducted using statistical program for social sciences 25.0 (SPSS 25.0), and P < 0.05 was considered as statistical significance. RESULTS: For patients with hypoxemia after accepting single-port VATS lobectomy, HFNO was no less effective than NIMV (P=0.333), and both of whom could fast increase patients' partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspiration O(2) (PaO(2)/FiO(2)) compared to NOB (P < 0.001). Besides, HFNO shows a great advantage in comfort degree and stay length (P < 0.001, P=0.004), and incidence of complications were slightly lower than other groups (P=0.232). But it is worthy to note that HFNO is still slightly less effective than NIMV in patients with postoperative hypoxemia accompanied by elevated partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO(2)). CONCLUSION: For patients with hypoxemia who accepting single-port VATS lobectomy, HFNO can be used as the first choice. However, for patients with postoperative hypoxemia accompanied by elevated PaCO(2), NIMV is still recommended to improve oxygenation.