Cargando…

高流量湿化氧疗对单孔胸腔镜下肺叶切除术后患者的疗效分析

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients who underwent lobectomy resection are prone to hypoxemia, and the vast majority present with type Ⅰ respiratory failure. Thus, improvement of hypoxemia is one of the most important factors to facilitate postoperative recovery of patients. In this study, the superio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36172728
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2022.102.38
_version_ 1784805668384931840
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients who underwent lobectomy resection are prone to hypoxemia, and the vast majority present with type Ⅰ respiratory failure. Thus, improvement of hypoxemia is one of the most important factors to facilitate postoperative recovery of patients. In this study, the superiority-inferiority of different oxygen inhalation methods were compared with high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNO), noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) and nasal oxygen breath (NOB) in patients with hypoxemia after single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy, and the clinical efficacy of HFNO in these patients was further investigated. METHODS: A total of 180 patients from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University in China with hypoxemia who accepting single-port VATS lobectomy from June 2021 to March 2022 were randomly divided into three groups (n=60), which were treated with HFNO, NIMV and NOB, respectively. The results of arterial blood gas analysis, patient's comfort score and incidence of complications were observed before, 1 h, 6 h-12 h and after use. Statistical analyses were conducted using statistical program for social sciences 25.0 (SPSS 25.0), and P < 0.05 was considered as statistical significance. RESULTS: For patients with hypoxemia after accepting single-port VATS lobectomy, HFNO was no less effective than NIMV (P=0.333), and both of whom could fast increase patients' partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspiration O(2) (PaO(2)/FiO(2)) compared to NOB (P < 0.001). Besides, HFNO shows a great advantage in comfort degree and stay length (P < 0.001, P=0.004), and incidence of complications were slightly lower than other groups (P=0.232). But it is worthy to note that HFNO is still slightly less effective than NIMV in patients with postoperative hypoxemia accompanied by elevated partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO(2)). CONCLUSION: For patients with hypoxemia who accepting single-port VATS lobectomy, HFNO can be used as the first choice. However, for patients with postoperative hypoxemia accompanied by elevated PaCO(2), NIMV is still recommended to improve oxygenation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9549426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher 中国肺癌杂志编辑部
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95494262022-10-24 高流量湿化氧疗对单孔胸腔镜下肺叶切除术后患者的疗效分析 Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi 临床研究 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients who underwent lobectomy resection are prone to hypoxemia, and the vast majority present with type Ⅰ respiratory failure. Thus, improvement of hypoxemia is one of the most important factors to facilitate postoperative recovery of patients. In this study, the superiority-inferiority of different oxygen inhalation methods were compared with high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNO), noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) and nasal oxygen breath (NOB) in patients with hypoxemia after single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy, and the clinical efficacy of HFNO in these patients was further investigated. METHODS: A total of 180 patients from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University in China with hypoxemia who accepting single-port VATS lobectomy from June 2021 to March 2022 were randomly divided into three groups (n=60), which were treated with HFNO, NIMV and NOB, respectively. The results of arterial blood gas analysis, patient's comfort score and incidence of complications were observed before, 1 h, 6 h-12 h and after use. Statistical analyses were conducted using statistical program for social sciences 25.0 (SPSS 25.0), and P < 0.05 was considered as statistical significance. RESULTS: For patients with hypoxemia after accepting single-port VATS lobectomy, HFNO was no less effective than NIMV (P=0.333), and both of whom could fast increase patients' partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspiration O(2) (PaO(2)/FiO(2)) compared to NOB (P < 0.001). Besides, HFNO shows a great advantage in comfort degree and stay length (P < 0.001, P=0.004), and incidence of complications were slightly lower than other groups (P=0.232). But it is worthy to note that HFNO is still slightly less effective than NIMV in patients with postoperative hypoxemia accompanied by elevated partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO(2)). CONCLUSION: For patients with hypoxemia who accepting single-port VATS lobectomy, HFNO can be used as the first choice. However, for patients with postoperative hypoxemia accompanied by elevated PaCO(2), NIMV is still recommended to improve oxygenation. 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2022-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9549426/ /pubmed/36172728 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2022.102.38 Text en 版权所有©《中国肺癌杂志》编辑部2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) License. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/.
spellingShingle 临床研究
高流量湿化氧疗对单孔胸腔镜下肺叶切除术后患者的疗效分析
title 高流量湿化氧疗对单孔胸腔镜下肺叶切除术后患者的疗效分析
title_full 高流量湿化氧疗对单孔胸腔镜下肺叶切除术后患者的疗效分析
title_fullStr 高流量湿化氧疗对单孔胸腔镜下肺叶切除术后患者的疗效分析
title_full_unstemmed 高流量湿化氧疗对单孔胸腔镜下肺叶切除术后患者的疗效分析
title_short 高流量湿化氧疗对单孔胸腔镜下肺叶切除术后患者的疗效分析
title_sort 高流量湿化氧疗对单孔胸腔镜下肺叶切除术后患者的疗效分析
topic 临床研究
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36172728
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2022.102.38
work_keys_str_mv AT gāoliúliàngshīhuàyǎngliáoduìdānkǒngxiōngqiāngjìngxiàfèiyèqièchúshùhòuhuànzhědeliáoxiàofēnxī
AT gāoliúliàngshīhuàyǎngliáoduìdānkǒngxiōngqiāngjìngxiàfèiyèqièchúshùhòuhuànzhědeliáoxiàofēnxī
AT gāoliúliàngshīhuàyǎngliáoduìdānkǒngxiōngqiāngjìngxiàfèiyèqièchúshùhòuhuànzhědeliáoxiàofēnxī
AT gāoliúliàngshīhuàyǎngliáoduìdānkǒngxiōngqiāngjìngxiàfèiyèqièchúshùhòuhuànzhědeliáoxiàofēnxī
AT gāoliúliàngshīhuàyǎngliáoduìdānkǒngxiōngqiāngjìngxiàfèiyèqièchúshùhòuhuànzhědeliáoxiàofēnxī
AT gāoliúliàngshīhuàyǎngliáoduìdānkǒngxiōngqiāngjìngxiàfèiyèqièchúshùhòuhuànzhědeliáoxiàofēnxī
AT gāoliúliàngshīhuàyǎngliáoduìdānkǒngxiōngqiāngjìngxiàfèiyèqièchúshùhòuhuànzhědeliáoxiàofēnxī