Cargando…
The influence of ambient cure chemistry and stoichiometry on epoxy coating surfaces
The surface properties of epoxy resin coatings influence their function as substrates for subsequent coats. Variation in ambient cure conditions (temperature and relative humidity, RH), stoichiometry (ratio of epoxy: amine) and delay time between epoxy component mixing and film casting (“induction t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society of Chemistry
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36320514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d2ra05067f |
_version_ | 1784805702650298368 |
---|---|
author | Bannister, Callum Guy, Alan Mihaylova, Ralitsa Orgill, Joseph Burg, Stephanie L. Parnell, Andrew Thompson, Richard L. |
author_facet | Bannister, Callum Guy, Alan Mihaylova, Ralitsa Orgill, Joseph Burg, Stephanie L. Parnell, Andrew Thompson, Richard L. |
author_sort | Bannister, Callum |
collection | PubMed |
description | The surface properties of epoxy resin coatings influence their function as substrates for subsequent coats. Variation in ambient cure conditions (temperature and relative humidity, RH), stoichiometry (ratio of epoxy: amine) and delay time between epoxy component mixing and film casting (“induction time”) significantly altered the surface properties of ambient cured epoxy resin coatings (Dow Epoxy Novolac D.E.N. 431, resorcinol diglycidyl ether and 4,4-diaminodicyclohexylmethane). Gravimetric analysis showed that increasing induction time significantly reduced surface layer formation (carbamation) of cured epoxy resin coatings at 80% RH but had no measurable effect at 40% RH and below. RMS surface roughness increased with increasing RH and decreased with increasing induction time and ambient cure temperature, at two stoichiometric extremes. However, the net change in surface area arising from these conditions was not sufficient to significantly alter the equilibrium contact angles or wetting regime. We conclude that the observed significant variation in surface wettability was more likely to depend on variation in surface chemistry than roughness; stoichiometry was the variable which most significantly influenced surface wettability, average void volume and fractional free volume, while cure temperature significantly influenced the extent of cure at both stoichiometries. Off-stoichiometry formulation and elevated ambient cure temperature significantly increased system average void volume while fractional free volume decreased, which may be significant for the barrier properties of the final coating. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9549571 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Royal Society of Chemistry |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95495712022-10-31 The influence of ambient cure chemistry and stoichiometry on epoxy coating surfaces Bannister, Callum Guy, Alan Mihaylova, Ralitsa Orgill, Joseph Burg, Stephanie L. Parnell, Andrew Thompson, Richard L. RSC Adv Chemistry The surface properties of epoxy resin coatings influence their function as substrates for subsequent coats. Variation in ambient cure conditions (temperature and relative humidity, RH), stoichiometry (ratio of epoxy: amine) and delay time between epoxy component mixing and film casting (“induction time”) significantly altered the surface properties of ambient cured epoxy resin coatings (Dow Epoxy Novolac D.E.N. 431, resorcinol diglycidyl ether and 4,4-diaminodicyclohexylmethane). Gravimetric analysis showed that increasing induction time significantly reduced surface layer formation (carbamation) of cured epoxy resin coatings at 80% RH but had no measurable effect at 40% RH and below. RMS surface roughness increased with increasing RH and decreased with increasing induction time and ambient cure temperature, at two stoichiometric extremes. However, the net change in surface area arising from these conditions was not sufficient to significantly alter the equilibrium contact angles or wetting regime. We conclude that the observed significant variation in surface wettability was more likely to depend on variation in surface chemistry than roughness; stoichiometry was the variable which most significantly influenced surface wettability, average void volume and fractional free volume, while cure temperature significantly influenced the extent of cure at both stoichiometries. Off-stoichiometry formulation and elevated ambient cure temperature significantly increased system average void volume while fractional free volume decreased, which may be significant for the barrier properties of the final coating. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2022-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9549571/ /pubmed/36320514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d2ra05067f Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Chemistry Bannister, Callum Guy, Alan Mihaylova, Ralitsa Orgill, Joseph Burg, Stephanie L. Parnell, Andrew Thompson, Richard L. The influence of ambient cure chemistry and stoichiometry on epoxy coating surfaces |
title | The influence of ambient cure chemistry and stoichiometry on epoxy coating surfaces |
title_full | The influence of ambient cure chemistry and stoichiometry on epoxy coating surfaces |
title_fullStr | The influence of ambient cure chemistry and stoichiometry on epoxy coating surfaces |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of ambient cure chemistry and stoichiometry on epoxy coating surfaces |
title_short | The influence of ambient cure chemistry and stoichiometry on epoxy coating surfaces |
title_sort | influence of ambient cure chemistry and stoichiometry on epoxy coating surfaces |
topic | Chemistry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36320514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d2ra05067f |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bannistercallum theinfluenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces AT guyalan theinfluenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces AT mihaylovaralitsa theinfluenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces AT orgilljoseph theinfluenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces AT burgstephaniel theinfluenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces AT parnellandrew theinfluenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces AT thompsonrichardl theinfluenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces AT bannistercallum influenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces AT guyalan influenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces AT mihaylovaralitsa influenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces AT orgilljoseph influenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces AT burgstephaniel influenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces AT parnellandrew influenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces AT thompsonrichardl influenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces |