Cargando…

The influence of ambient cure chemistry and stoichiometry on epoxy coating surfaces

The surface properties of epoxy resin coatings influence their function as substrates for subsequent coats. Variation in ambient cure conditions (temperature and relative humidity, RH), stoichiometry (ratio of epoxy: amine) and delay time between epoxy component mixing and film casting (“induction t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bannister, Callum, Guy, Alan, Mihaylova, Ralitsa, Orgill, Joseph, Burg, Stephanie L., Parnell, Andrew, Thompson, Richard L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36320514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d2ra05067f
_version_ 1784805702650298368
author Bannister, Callum
Guy, Alan
Mihaylova, Ralitsa
Orgill, Joseph
Burg, Stephanie L.
Parnell, Andrew
Thompson, Richard L.
author_facet Bannister, Callum
Guy, Alan
Mihaylova, Ralitsa
Orgill, Joseph
Burg, Stephanie L.
Parnell, Andrew
Thompson, Richard L.
author_sort Bannister, Callum
collection PubMed
description The surface properties of epoxy resin coatings influence their function as substrates for subsequent coats. Variation in ambient cure conditions (temperature and relative humidity, RH), stoichiometry (ratio of epoxy: amine) and delay time between epoxy component mixing and film casting (“induction time”) significantly altered the surface properties of ambient cured epoxy resin coatings (Dow Epoxy Novolac D.E.N. 431, resorcinol diglycidyl ether and 4,4-diaminodicyclohexylmethane). Gravimetric analysis showed that increasing induction time significantly reduced surface layer formation (carbamation) of cured epoxy resin coatings at 80% RH but had no measurable effect at 40% RH and below. RMS surface roughness increased with increasing RH and decreased with increasing induction time and ambient cure temperature, at two stoichiometric extremes. However, the net change in surface area arising from these conditions was not sufficient to significantly alter the equilibrium contact angles or wetting regime. We conclude that the observed significant variation in surface wettability was more likely to depend on variation in surface chemistry than roughness; stoichiometry was the variable which most significantly influenced surface wettability, average void volume and fractional free volume, while cure temperature significantly influenced the extent of cure at both stoichiometries. Off-stoichiometry formulation and elevated ambient cure temperature significantly increased system average void volume while fractional free volume decreased, which may be significant for the barrier properties of the final coating.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9549571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95495712022-10-31 The influence of ambient cure chemistry and stoichiometry on epoxy coating surfaces Bannister, Callum Guy, Alan Mihaylova, Ralitsa Orgill, Joseph Burg, Stephanie L. Parnell, Andrew Thompson, Richard L. RSC Adv Chemistry The surface properties of epoxy resin coatings influence their function as substrates for subsequent coats. Variation in ambient cure conditions (temperature and relative humidity, RH), stoichiometry (ratio of epoxy: amine) and delay time between epoxy component mixing and film casting (“induction time”) significantly altered the surface properties of ambient cured epoxy resin coatings (Dow Epoxy Novolac D.E.N. 431, resorcinol diglycidyl ether and 4,4-diaminodicyclohexylmethane). Gravimetric analysis showed that increasing induction time significantly reduced surface layer formation (carbamation) of cured epoxy resin coatings at 80% RH but had no measurable effect at 40% RH and below. RMS surface roughness increased with increasing RH and decreased with increasing induction time and ambient cure temperature, at two stoichiometric extremes. However, the net change in surface area arising from these conditions was not sufficient to significantly alter the equilibrium contact angles or wetting regime. We conclude that the observed significant variation in surface wettability was more likely to depend on variation in surface chemistry than roughness; stoichiometry was the variable which most significantly influenced surface wettability, average void volume and fractional free volume, while cure temperature significantly influenced the extent of cure at both stoichiometries. Off-stoichiometry formulation and elevated ambient cure temperature significantly increased system average void volume while fractional free volume decreased, which may be significant for the barrier properties of the final coating. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2022-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9549571/ /pubmed/36320514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d2ra05067f Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Bannister, Callum
Guy, Alan
Mihaylova, Ralitsa
Orgill, Joseph
Burg, Stephanie L.
Parnell, Andrew
Thompson, Richard L.
The influence of ambient cure chemistry and stoichiometry on epoxy coating surfaces
title The influence of ambient cure chemistry and stoichiometry on epoxy coating surfaces
title_full The influence of ambient cure chemistry and stoichiometry on epoxy coating surfaces
title_fullStr The influence of ambient cure chemistry and stoichiometry on epoxy coating surfaces
title_full_unstemmed The influence of ambient cure chemistry and stoichiometry on epoxy coating surfaces
title_short The influence of ambient cure chemistry and stoichiometry on epoxy coating surfaces
title_sort influence of ambient cure chemistry and stoichiometry on epoxy coating surfaces
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36320514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d2ra05067f
work_keys_str_mv AT bannistercallum theinfluenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces
AT guyalan theinfluenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces
AT mihaylovaralitsa theinfluenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces
AT orgilljoseph theinfluenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces
AT burgstephaniel theinfluenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces
AT parnellandrew theinfluenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces
AT thompsonrichardl theinfluenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces
AT bannistercallum influenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces
AT guyalan influenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces
AT mihaylovaralitsa influenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces
AT orgilljoseph influenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces
AT burgstephaniel influenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces
AT parnellandrew influenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces
AT thompsonrichardl influenceofambientcurechemistryandstoichiometryonepoxycoatingsurfaces