Cargando…

GPs’ identification of patients with mental distress: a coupled questionnaire and cohort study from norwegian urban general practice

BACKGROUND: Mental health problems are one of the leading causes of disease burden worldwide, and are mainly diagnosed and treated in general practice. It is unclear however, how general practitioners (GPs) identify mental health problems in their patients. The aim of this study was to explore how p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dahli, Mina P., Haavet, Ole R, Ruud, Torleif, Brekke, Mette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36210430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01865-x
_version_ 1784805715644252160
author Dahli, Mina P.
Haavet, Ole R
Ruud, Torleif
Brekke, Mette
author_facet Dahli, Mina P.
Haavet, Ole R
Ruud, Torleif
Brekke, Mette
author_sort Dahli, Mina P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mental health problems are one of the leading causes of disease burden worldwide, and are mainly diagnosed and treated in general practice. It is unclear however, how general practitioners (GPs) identify mental health problems in their patients. The aim of this study was to explore how patients’ self-reported levels of mental distress correspond with psychological diagnoses made by their GPs, and associations with sex, age, number of consultations, and somatic symptom diagnoses. METHODS: A questionnaire study coupled with retrospective and prospective cohort data from 553 patients aged 16–65 years in six GP offices in Oslo, Norway during 21 months in 2014–2016. RESULTS: We found that 73.3% of patients with self-reported high levels of mental distress versus only 13.3% of the patients with low levels of mental distress had received a psychological diagnosis (p < 0.01). We found an increase in number of consultations for the group with high levels of mental distress regardless of having received a psychological diagnosis (p < 0.01). There was also an increase in number of somatic symptoms (p = 0.04) and higher number of females (0.04) in this group. 35% of patients had received one or more psychological diagnosis by their GP. Mean CORE-10 score, being female and a high number of consultations was associated with having received a psychological diagnosis. In the adjusted analyses high CORE-10 score and a high number of consultations still predicted a psychological diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: We found a clear association between self-reported mental distress and having received a psychological diagnosis amongst the participants, and the probability for being identified increased with increasing levels of mental distress, and increasing number of visits to their doctor. This suggests that GPs can identify patients with high levels of mental distress in general practice in an adequate way, even though this can sometimes be a complex issue. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration The main study was retrospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on August 10 2019 with identification number NCT03624829. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01865-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9549632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95496322022-10-11 GPs’ identification of patients with mental distress: a coupled questionnaire and cohort study from norwegian urban general practice Dahli, Mina P. Haavet, Ole R Ruud, Torleif Brekke, Mette BMC Prim Care Research BACKGROUND: Mental health problems are one of the leading causes of disease burden worldwide, and are mainly diagnosed and treated in general practice. It is unclear however, how general practitioners (GPs) identify mental health problems in their patients. The aim of this study was to explore how patients’ self-reported levels of mental distress correspond with psychological diagnoses made by their GPs, and associations with sex, age, number of consultations, and somatic symptom diagnoses. METHODS: A questionnaire study coupled with retrospective and prospective cohort data from 553 patients aged 16–65 years in six GP offices in Oslo, Norway during 21 months in 2014–2016. RESULTS: We found that 73.3% of patients with self-reported high levels of mental distress versus only 13.3% of the patients with low levels of mental distress had received a psychological diagnosis (p < 0.01). We found an increase in number of consultations for the group with high levels of mental distress regardless of having received a psychological diagnosis (p < 0.01). There was also an increase in number of somatic symptoms (p = 0.04) and higher number of females (0.04) in this group. 35% of patients had received one or more psychological diagnosis by their GP. Mean CORE-10 score, being female and a high number of consultations was associated with having received a psychological diagnosis. In the adjusted analyses high CORE-10 score and a high number of consultations still predicted a psychological diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: We found a clear association between self-reported mental distress and having received a psychological diagnosis amongst the participants, and the probability for being identified increased with increasing levels of mental distress, and increasing number of visits to their doctor. This suggests that GPs can identify patients with high levels of mental distress in general practice in an adequate way, even though this can sometimes be a complex issue. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration The main study was retrospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on August 10 2019 with identification number NCT03624829. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01865-x. BioMed Central 2022-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9549632/ /pubmed/36210430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01865-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Dahli, Mina P.
Haavet, Ole R
Ruud, Torleif
Brekke, Mette
GPs’ identification of patients with mental distress: a coupled questionnaire and cohort study from norwegian urban general practice
title GPs’ identification of patients with mental distress: a coupled questionnaire and cohort study from norwegian urban general practice
title_full GPs’ identification of patients with mental distress: a coupled questionnaire and cohort study from norwegian urban general practice
title_fullStr GPs’ identification of patients with mental distress: a coupled questionnaire and cohort study from norwegian urban general practice
title_full_unstemmed GPs’ identification of patients with mental distress: a coupled questionnaire and cohort study from norwegian urban general practice
title_short GPs’ identification of patients with mental distress: a coupled questionnaire and cohort study from norwegian urban general practice
title_sort gps’ identification of patients with mental distress: a coupled questionnaire and cohort study from norwegian urban general practice
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36210430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01865-x
work_keys_str_mv AT dahliminap gpsidentificationofpatientswithmentaldistressacoupledquestionnaireandcohortstudyfromnorwegianurbangeneralpractice
AT haavetoler gpsidentificationofpatientswithmentaldistressacoupledquestionnaireandcohortstudyfromnorwegianurbangeneralpractice
AT ruudtorleif gpsidentificationofpatientswithmentaldistressacoupledquestionnaireandcohortstudyfromnorwegianurbangeneralpractice
AT brekkemette gpsidentificationofpatientswithmentaldistressacoupledquestionnaireandcohortstudyfromnorwegianurbangeneralpractice