Cargando…
Evaluating a tool to improve engagement and recruitment of under-served groups in trials
BACKGROUND: Despite substantial awareness that certain groups (e.g. ethnic minorities) are under-represented and under-served in trials, limited progress has been made in addressing this. As well as a public service and ethical duty to recruit and engage under-served groups in relevant research, imp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36210444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06747-2 |
_version_ | 1784805721568706560 |
---|---|
author | Morris, Lydia Dumville, Jo Treweek, Shaun Miah, Nasima Curtis, Ffion Bower, Peter |
author_facet | Morris, Lydia Dumville, Jo Treweek, Shaun Miah, Nasima Curtis, Ffion Bower, Peter |
author_sort | Morris, Lydia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite substantial awareness that certain groups (e.g. ethnic minorities) are under-represented and under-served in trials, limited progress has been made in addressing this. As well as a public service and ethical duty to recruit and engage under-served groups in relevant research, importantly, there are clear scientific benefits, for example, increased generalisability. The key aims of the current study were to explore the following: general barriers and facilitators to enhancing the recruitment of under-served groups into trials, the usability and value of a specific tool (INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework) to support engagement and recruitment of under-served groups, and ways of engaging diverse patient, public and community involvement and engagement (PCIE) groups. METHODS: Firstly, researchers completed a brief survey in relation to a specific trial in which they were involved (N = 182, 38% response rate). A second stage involved sampling survey respondents and asking them to complete the INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework and then a remote semi-structured interview (N = 15). Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. Finally, we conducted a consultation process with PCIE contributors primarily to develop guidelines for discussing the INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework with PCIE representatives. RESULTS: Researchers recognised the importance of increasing engagement and recruitment of under-served groups within trials, but varied in their knowledge, ability and commitment to implementation in practice. The INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework was described by some as raising their awareness of how inclusion could be improved. Respondents highlighted a need for shared resources and wider structural change to facilitate such engagement. PCIE was identified, in the survey and interviews, as the most common method of trying to improve recruitment of under-served groups. However, researchers also commonly highlighted that PCIE groups were sometimes not very diverse. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for researchers to consider the funding and time resources required for diverse and inclusive recruitment to trials and for funders to enable this. The INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework can help to raise awareness of inclusion challenges. This study indicates that it is important to take proactive steps to involve relevant under-served groups in PCIE and practical suggestions are made to facilitate this. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06747-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9549666 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95496662022-10-11 Evaluating a tool to improve engagement and recruitment of under-served groups in trials Morris, Lydia Dumville, Jo Treweek, Shaun Miah, Nasima Curtis, Ffion Bower, Peter Trials Methodology BACKGROUND: Despite substantial awareness that certain groups (e.g. ethnic minorities) are under-represented and under-served in trials, limited progress has been made in addressing this. As well as a public service and ethical duty to recruit and engage under-served groups in relevant research, importantly, there are clear scientific benefits, for example, increased generalisability. The key aims of the current study were to explore the following: general barriers and facilitators to enhancing the recruitment of under-served groups into trials, the usability and value of a specific tool (INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework) to support engagement and recruitment of under-served groups, and ways of engaging diverse patient, public and community involvement and engagement (PCIE) groups. METHODS: Firstly, researchers completed a brief survey in relation to a specific trial in which they were involved (N = 182, 38% response rate). A second stage involved sampling survey respondents and asking them to complete the INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework and then a remote semi-structured interview (N = 15). Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. Finally, we conducted a consultation process with PCIE contributors primarily to develop guidelines for discussing the INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework with PCIE representatives. RESULTS: Researchers recognised the importance of increasing engagement and recruitment of under-served groups within trials, but varied in their knowledge, ability and commitment to implementation in practice. The INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework was described by some as raising their awareness of how inclusion could be improved. Respondents highlighted a need for shared resources and wider structural change to facilitate such engagement. PCIE was identified, in the survey and interviews, as the most common method of trying to improve recruitment of under-served groups. However, researchers also commonly highlighted that PCIE groups were sometimes not very diverse. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for researchers to consider the funding and time resources required for diverse and inclusive recruitment to trials and for funders to enable this. The INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework can help to raise awareness of inclusion challenges. This study indicates that it is important to take proactive steps to involve relevant under-served groups in PCIE and practical suggestions are made to facilitate this. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06747-2. BioMed Central 2022-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9549666/ /pubmed/36210444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06747-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Morris, Lydia Dumville, Jo Treweek, Shaun Miah, Nasima Curtis, Ffion Bower, Peter Evaluating a tool to improve engagement and recruitment of under-served groups in trials |
title | Evaluating a tool to improve engagement and recruitment of under-served groups in trials |
title_full | Evaluating a tool to improve engagement and recruitment of under-served groups in trials |
title_fullStr | Evaluating a tool to improve engagement and recruitment of under-served groups in trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating a tool to improve engagement and recruitment of under-served groups in trials |
title_short | Evaluating a tool to improve engagement and recruitment of under-served groups in trials |
title_sort | evaluating a tool to improve engagement and recruitment of under-served groups in trials |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36210444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06747-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morrislydia evaluatingatooltoimproveengagementandrecruitmentofunderservedgroupsintrials AT dumvillejo evaluatingatooltoimproveengagementandrecruitmentofunderservedgroupsintrials AT treweekshaun evaluatingatooltoimproveengagementandrecruitmentofunderservedgroupsintrials AT miahnasima evaluatingatooltoimproveengagementandrecruitmentofunderservedgroupsintrials AT curtisffion evaluatingatooltoimproveengagementandrecruitmentofunderservedgroupsintrials AT bowerpeter evaluatingatooltoimproveengagementandrecruitmentofunderservedgroupsintrials |