Cargando…

Evaluating a tool to improve engagement and recruitment of under-served groups in trials

BACKGROUND: Despite substantial awareness that certain groups (e.g. ethnic minorities) are under-represented and under-served in trials, limited progress has been made in addressing this. As well as a public service and ethical duty to recruit and engage under-served groups in relevant research, imp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morris, Lydia, Dumville, Jo, Treweek, Shaun, Miah, Nasima, Curtis, Ffion, Bower, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36210444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06747-2
_version_ 1784805721568706560
author Morris, Lydia
Dumville, Jo
Treweek, Shaun
Miah, Nasima
Curtis, Ffion
Bower, Peter
author_facet Morris, Lydia
Dumville, Jo
Treweek, Shaun
Miah, Nasima
Curtis, Ffion
Bower, Peter
author_sort Morris, Lydia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite substantial awareness that certain groups (e.g. ethnic minorities) are under-represented and under-served in trials, limited progress has been made in addressing this. As well as a public service and ethical duty to recruit and engage under-served groups in relevant research, importantly, there are clear scientific benefits, for example, increased generalisability. The key aims of the current study were to explore the following: general barriers and facilitators to enhancing the recruitment of under-served groups into trials, the usability and value of a specific tool (INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework) to support engagement and recruitment of under-served groups, and ways of engaging diverse patient, public and community involvement and engagement (PCIE) groups. METHODS: Firstly, researchers completed a brief survey in relation to a specific trial in which they were involved (N = 182, 38% response rate). A second stage involved sampling survey respondents and asking them to complete the INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework and then a remote semi-structured interview (N = 15). Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. Finally, we conducted a consultation process with PCIE contributors primarily to develop guidelines for discussing the INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework with PCIE representatives. RESULTS: Researchers recognised the importance of increasing engagement and recruitment of under-served groups within trials, but varied in their knowledge, ability and commitment to implementation in practice. The INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework was described by some as raising their awareness of how inclusion could be improved. Respondents highlighted a need for shared resources and wider structural change to facilitate such engagement. PCIE was identified, in the survey and interviews, as the most common method of trying to improve recruitment of under-served groups. However, researchers also commonly highlighted that PCIE groups were sometimes not very diverse. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for researchers to consider the funding and time resources required for diverse and inclusive recruitment to trials and for funders to enable this. The INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework can help to raise awareness of inclusion challenges. This study indicates that it is important to take proactive steps to involve relevant under-served groups in PCIE and practical suggestions are made to facilitate this. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06747-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9549666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95496662022-10-11 Evaluating a tool to improve engagement and recruitment of under-served groups in trials Morris, Lydia Dumville, Jo Treweek, Shaun Miah, Nasima Curtis, Ffion Bower, Peter Trials Methodology BACKGROUND: Despite substantial awareness that certain groups (e.g. ethnic minorities) are under-represented and under-served in trials, limited progress has been made in addressing this. As well as a public service and ethical duty to recruit and engage under-served groups in relevant research, importantly, there are clear scientific benefits, for example, increased generalisability. The key aims of the current study were to explore the following: general barriers and facilitators to enhancing the recruitment of under-served groups into trials, the usability and value of a specific tool (INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework) to support engagement and recruitment of under-served groups, and ways of engaging diverse patient, public and community involvement and engagement (PCIE) groups. METHODS: Firstly, researchers completed a brief survey in relation to a specific trial in which they were involved (N = 182, 38% response rate). A second stage involved sampling survey respondents and asking them to complete the INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework and then a remote semi-structured interview (N = 15). Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. Finally, we conducted a consultation process with PCIE contributors primarily to develop guidelines for discussing the INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework with PCIE representatives. RESULTS: Researchers recognised the importance of increasing engagement and recruitment of under-served groups within trials, but varied in their knowledge, ability and commitment to implementation in practice. The INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework was described by some as raising their awareness of how inclusion could be improved. Respondents highlighted a need for shared resources and wider structural change to facilitate such engagement. PCIE was identified, in the survey and interviews, as the most common method of trying to improve recruitment of under-served groups. However, researchers also commonly highlighted that PCIE groups were sometimes not very diverse. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for researchers to consider the funding and time resources required for diverse and inclusive recruitment to trials and for funders to enable this. The INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework can help to raise awareness of inclusion challenges. This study indicates that it is important to take proactive steps to involve relevant under-served groups in PCIE and practical suggestions are made to facilitate this. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06747-2. BioMed Central 2022-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9549666/ /pubmed/36210444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06747-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Methodology
Morris, Lydia
Dumville, Jo
Treweek, Shaun
Miah, Nasima
Curtis, Ffion
Bower, Peter
Evaluating a tool to improve engagement and recruitment of under-served groups in trials
title Evaluating a tool to improve engagement and recruitment of under-served groups in trials
title_full Evaluating a tool to improve engagement and recruitment of under-served groups in trials
title_fullStr Evaluating a tool to improve engagement and recruitment of under-served groups in trials
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating a tool to improve engagement and recruitment of under-served groups in trials
title_short Evaluating a tool to improve engagement and recruitment of under-served groups in trials
title_sort evaluating a tool to improve engagement and recruitment of under-served groups in trials
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9549666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36210444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06747-2
work_keys_str_mv AT morrislydia evaluatingatooltoimproveengagementandrecruitmentofunderservedgroupsintrials
AT dumvillejo evaluatingatooltoimproveengagementandrecruitmentofunderservedgroupsintrials
AT treweekshaun evaluatingatooltoimproveengagementandrecruitmentofunderservedgroupsintrials
AT miahnasima evaluatingatooltoimproveengagementandrecruitmentofunderservedgroupsintrials
AT curtisffion evaluatingatooltoimproveengagementandrecruitmentofunderservedgroupsintrials
AT bowerpeter evaluatingatooltoimproveengagementandrecruitmentofunderservedgroupsintrials