Cargando…

Comparison of vaccination efficacy using live or ultraviolet-inactivated influenza viruses introduced by different routes in a mouse model

Influenza is a major cause of highly contagious respiratory illness resulting in high mortality and morbidity worldwide. Annual vaccination is an effective way to prevent infection and complication from constantly mutating influenza strains. Vaccination utilizes preemptive inoculation with live viru...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baek, Kyeongbin, Maharjan, Sony, Akauliya, Madhav, Thapa, Bikash, Kim, Dongbum, Kim, Jinsoo, Kim, Minyoung, Kang, Mijeong, Kim, Suyeon, Bae, Joon-Yong, Lee, Keun-Wook, Park, Man-Seong, Lee, Younghee, Kwon, Hyung-Joo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9550053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36215268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275722
_version_ 1784805804983975936
author Baek, Kyeongbin
Maharjan, Sony
Akauliya, Madhav
Thapa, Bikash
Kim, Dongbum
Kim, Jinsoo
Kim, Minyoung
Kang, Mijeong
Kim, Suyeon
Bae, Joon-Yong
Lee, Keun-Wook
Park, Man-Seong
Lee, Younghee
Kwon, Hyung-Joo
author_facet Baek, Kyeongbin
Maharjan, Sony
Akauliya, Madhav
Thapa, Bikash
Kim, Dongbum
Kim, Jinsoo
Kim, Minyoung
Kang, Mijeong
Kim, Suyeon
Bae, Joon-Yong
Lee, Keun-Wook
Park, Man-Seong
Lee, Younghee
Kwon, Hyung-Joo
author_sort Baek, Kyeongbin
collection PubMed
description Influenza is a major cause of highly contagious respiratory illness resulting in high mortality and morbidity worldwide. Annual vaccination is an effective way to prevent infection and complication from constantly mutating influenza strains. Vaccination utilizes preemptive inoculation with live virus, live attenuated virus, inactivated virus, or virus segments for optimal immune activation. The route of administration also affects the efficacy of the vaccination. Here, we evaluated the effects of inoculation with ultraviolet (UV)-inactivated or live influenza A virus strains and compared their effectiveness and cross protection when intraperitoneal and intramuscular routes of administration were used in mice. Intramuscular or intraperitoneal inoculation with UV-inactivated Influenza A/WSN/1933 provided some protection against intranasal challenge with a lethal dose of live Influenza A/WSN/1933 but only when a high dose of the virus was used in the inoculation. By contrast, inoculation with a low dose of live virus via either route provided complete protection against the same intranasal challenge. Intraperitoneal inoculation with live or UV-inactivated Influenza A/Philippines/2/1982 and intramuscular inoculation with UV-inactivated Influenza A/Philippines/2/1982 failed to produce cross-reactive antibodies against Influenza A/WSN/1933. Intramuscular inoculation with live Influenza A/Philippines/2/1982 induced small amounts of cross-reactive antibodies but could not suppress the cytokine storm produced upon intranasal challenge with Influenza A/WSN/1993. None of the tested inoculation conditions provided observable cross protection against intranasal challenge with a different influenza strain. Taken together, vaccination efficacy was affected by the state and dose of the vaccine virus and the route of administration. These results provide practical data for the development of effective vaccines against influenza virus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9550053
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95500532022-10-11 Comparison of vaccination efficacy using live or ultraviolet-inactivated influenza viruses introduced by different routes in a mouse model Baek, Kyeongbin Maharjan, Sony Akauliya, Madhav Thapa, Bikash Kim, Dongbum Kim, Jinsoo Kim, Minyoung Kang, Mijeong Kim, Suyeon Bae, Joon-Yong Lee, Keun-Wook Park, Man-Seong Lee, Younghee Kwon, Hyung-Joo PLoS One Research Article Influenza is a major cause of highly contagious respiratory illness resulting in high mortality and morbidity worldwide. Annual vaccination is an effective way to prevent infection and complication from constantly mutating influenza strains. Vaccination utilizes preemptive inoculation with live virus, live attenuated virus, inactivated virus, or virus segments for optimal immune activation. The route of administration also affects the efficacy of the vaccination. Here, we evaluated the effects of inoculation with ultraviolet (UV)-inactivated or live influenza A virus strains and compared their effectiveness and cross protection when intraperitoneal and intramuscular routes of administration were used in mice. Intramuscular or intraperitoneal inoculation with UV-inactivated Influenza A/WSN/1933 provided some protection against intranasal challenge with a lethal dose of live Influenza A/WSN/1933 but only when a high dose of the virus was used in the inoculation. By contrast, inoculation with a low dose of live virus via either route provided complete protection against the same intranasal challenge. Intraperitoneal inoculation with live or UV-inactivated Influenza A/Philippines/2/1982 and intramuscular inoculation with UV-inactivated Influenza A/Philippines/2/1982 failed to produce cross-reactive antibodies against Influenza A/WSN/1933. Intramuscular inoculation with live Influenza A/Philippines/2/1982 induced small amounts of cross-reactive antibodies but could not suppress the cytokine storm produced upon intranasal challenge with Influenza A/WSN/1993. None of the tested inoculation conditions provided observable cross protection against intranasal challenge with a different influenza strain. Taken together, vaccination efficacy was affected by the state and dose of the vaccine virus and the route of administration. These results provide practical data for the development of effective vaccines against influenza virus. Public Library of Science 2022-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9550053/ /pubmed/36215268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275722 Text en © 2022 Baek et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Baek, Kyeongbin
Maharjan, Sony
Akauliya, Madhav
Thapa, Bikash
Kim, Dongbum
Kim, Jinsoo
Kim, Minyoung
Kang, Mijeong
Kim, Suyeon
Bae, Joon-Yong
Lee, Keun-Wook
Park, Man-Seong
Lee, Younghee
Kwon, Hyung-Joo
Comparison of vaccination efficacy using live or ultraviolet-inactivated influenza viruses introduced by different routes in a mouse model
title Comparison of vaccination efficacy using live or ultraviolet-inactivated influenza viruses introduced by different routes in a mouse model
title_full Comparison of vaccination efficacy using live or ultraviolet-inactivated influenza viruses introduced by different routes in a mouse model
title_fullStr Comparison of vaccination efficacy using live or ultraviolet-inactivated influenza viruses introduced by different routes in a mouse model
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of vaccination efficacy using live or ultraviolet-inactivated influenza viruses introduced by different routes in a mouse model
title_short Comparison of vaccination efficacy using live or ultraviolet-inactivated influenza viruses introduced by different routes in a mouse model
title_sort comparison of vaccination efficacy using live or ultraviolet-inactivated influenza viruses introduced by different routes in a mouse model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9550053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36215268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275722
work_keys_str_mv AT baekkyeongbin comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel
AT maharjansony comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel
AT akauliyamadhav comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel
AT thapabikash comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel
AT kimdongbum comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel
AT kimjinsoo comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel
AT kimminyoung comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel
AT kangmijeong comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel
AT kimsuyeon comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel
AT baejoonyong comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel
AT leekeunwook comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel
AT parkmanseong comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel
AT leeyounghee comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel
AT kwonhyungjoo comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel