Cargando…
Comparison of vaccination efficacy using live or ultraviolet-inactivated influenza viruses introduced by different routes in a mouse model
Influenza is a major cause of highly contagious respiratory illness resulting in high mortality and morbidity worldwide. Annual vaccination is an effective way to prevent infection and complication from constantly mutating influenza strains. Vaccination utilizes preemptive inoculation with live viru...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9550053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36215268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275722 |
_version_ | 1784805804983975936 |
---|---|
author | Baek, Kyeongbin Maharjan, Sony Akauliya, Madhav Thapa, Bikash Kim, Dongbum Kim, Jinsoo Kim, Minyoung Kang, Mijeong Kim, Suyeon Bae, Joon-Yong Lee, Keun-Wook Park, Man-Seong Lee, Younghee Kwon, Hyung-Joo |
author_facet | Baek, Kyeongbin Maharjan, Sony Akauliya, Madhav Thapa, Bikash Kim, Dongbum Kim, Jinsoo Kim, Minyoung Kang, Mijeong Kim, Suyeon Bae, Joon-Yong Lee, Keun-Wook Park, Man-Seong Lee, Younghee Kwon, Hyung-Joo |
author_sort | Baek, Kyeongbin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Influenza is a major cause of highly contagious respiratory illness resulting in high mortality and morbidity worldwide. Annual vaccination is an effective way to prevent infection and complication from constantly mutating influenza strains. Vaccination utilizes preemptive inoculation with live virus, live attenuated virus, inactivated virus, or virus segments for optimal immune activation. The route of administration also affects the efficacy of the vaccination. Here, we evaluated the effects of inoculation with ultraviolet (UV)-inactivated or live influenza A virus strains and compared their effectiveness and cross protection when intraperitoneal and intramuscular routes of administration were used in mice. Intramuscular or intraperitoneal inoculation with UV-inactivated Influenza A/WSN/1933 provided some protection against intranasal challenge with a lethal dose of live Influenza A/WSN/1933 but only when a high dose of the virus was used in the inoculation. By contrast, inoculation with a low dose of live virus via either route provided complete protection against the same intranasal challenge. Intraperitoneal inoculation with live or UV-inactivated Influenza A/Philippines/2/1982 and intramuscular inoculation with UV-inactivated Influenza A/Philippines/2/1982 failed to produce cross-reactive antibodies against Influenza A/WSN/1933. Intramuscular inoculation with live Influenza A/Philippines/2/1982 induced small amounts of cross-reactive antibodies but could not suppress the cytokine storm produced upon intranasal challenge with Influenza A/WSN/1993. None of the tested inoculation conditions provided observable cross protection against intranasal challenge with a different influenza strain. Taken together, vaccination efficacy was affected by the state and dose of the vaccine virus and the route of administration. These results provide practical data for the development of effective vaccines against influenza virus. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9550053 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95500532022-10-11 Comparison of vaccination efficacy using live or ultraviolet-inactivated influenza viruses introduced by different routes in a mouse model Baek, Kyeongbin Maharjan, Sony Akauliya, Madhav Thapa, Bikash Kim, Dongbum Kim, Jinsoo Kim, Minyoung Kang, Mijeong Kim, Suyeon Bae, Joon-Yong Lee, Keun-Wook Park, Man-Seong Lee, Younghee Kwon, Hyung-Joo PLoS One Research Article Influenza is a major cause of highly contagious respiratory illness resulting in high mortality and morbidity worldwide. Annual vaccination is an effective way to prevent infection and complication from constantly mutating influenza strains. Vaccination utilizes preemptive inoculation with live virus, live attenuated virus, inactivated virus, or virus segments for optimal immune activation. The route of administration also affects the efficacy of the vaccination. Here, we evaluated the effects of inoculation with ultraviolet (UV)-inactivated or live influenza A virus strains and compared their effectiveness and cross protection when intraperitoneal and intramuscular routes of administration were used in mice. Intramuscular or intraperitoneal inoculation with UV-inactivated Influenza A/WSN/1933 provided some protection against intranasal challenge with a lethal dose of live Influenza A/WSN/1933 but only when a high dose of the virus was used in the inoculation. By contrast, inoculation with a low dose of live virus via either route provided complete protection against the same intranasal challenge. Intraperitoneal inoculation with live or UV-inactivated Influenza A/Philippines/2/1982 and intramuscular inoculation with UV-inactivated Influenza A/Philippines/2/1982 failed to produce cross-reactive antibodies against Influenza A/WSN/1933. Intramuscular inoculation with live Influenza A/Philippines/2/1982 induced small amounts of cross-reactive antibodies but could not suppress the cytokine storm produced upon intranasal challenge with Influenza A/WSN/1993. None of the tested inoculation conditions provided observable cross protection against intranasal challenge with a different influenza strain. Taken together, vaccination efficacy was affected by the state and dose of the vaccine virus and the route of administration. These results provide practical data for the development of effective vaccines against influenza virus. Public Library of Science 2022-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9550053/ /pubmed/36215268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275722 Text en © 2022 Baek et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Baek, Kyeongbin Maharjan, Sony Akauliya, Madhav Thapa, Bikash Kim, Dongbum Kim, Jinsoo Kim, Minyoung Kang, Mijeong Kim, Suyeon Bae, Joon-Yong Lee, Keun-Wook Park, Man-Seong Lee, Younghee Kwon, Hyung-Joo Comparison of vaccination efficacy using live or ultraviolet-inactivated influenza viruses introduced by different routes in a mouse model |
title | Comparison of vaccination efficacy using live or ultraviolet-inactivated influenza viruses introduced by different routes in a mouse model |
title_full | Comparison of vaccination efficacy using live or ultraviolet-inactivated influenza viruses introduced by different routes in a mouse model |
title_fullStr | Comparison of vaccination efficacy using live or ultraviolet-inactivated influenza viruses introduced by different routes in a mouse model |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of vaccination efficacy using live or ultraviolet-inactivated influenza viruses introduced by different routes in a mouse model |
title_short | Comparison of vaccination efficacy using live or ultraviolet-inactivated influenza viruses introduced by different routes in a mouse model |
title_sort | comparison of vaccination efficacy using live or ultraviolet-inactivated influenza viruses introduced by different routes in a mouse model |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9550053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36215268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275722 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baekkyeongbin comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel AT maharjansony comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel AT akauliyamadhav comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel AT thapabikash comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel AT kimdongbum comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel AT kimjinsoo comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel AT kimminyoung comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel AT kangmijeong comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel AT kimsuyeon comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel AT baejoonyong comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel AT leekeunwook comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel AT parkmanseong comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel AT leeyounghee comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel AT kwonhyungjoo comparisonofvaccinationefficacyusingliveorultravioletinactivatedinfluenzavirusesintroducedbydifferentroutesinamousemodel |