Cargando…

Analysis of supplemental wildlife feeding in Mississippi and environmental gastrointestinal parasite load

Wildlife species are host to a variety of gastrointestinal parasites (GIPs). Artificially concentrating animals may increase the risk of disease spread due to increased GIP load and associated environmental load. Supplemental feeding of deer is common among hunters and known to concentrate animals,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Miranda H. J., Demarais, Steve, Brookshire, W. Cooper, Strickland, Bronson K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9550164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36225801
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.995437
_version_ 1784805819050622976
author Huang, Miranda H. J.
Demarais, Steve
Brookshire, W. Cooper
Strickland, Bronson K.
author_facet Huang, Miranda H. J.
Demarais, Steve
Brookshire, W. Cooper
Strickland, Bronson K.
author_sort Huang, Miranda H. J.
collection PubMed
description Wildlife species are host to a variety of gastrointestinal parasites (GIPs). Artificially concentrating animals may increase the risk of disease spread due to increased GIP load and associated environmental load. Supplemental feeding of deer is common among hunters and known to concentrate animals, but there is limited knowledge of how it affects GIP environmental load. GIP load was compared between ecologically-equivalent pairs of sites in Mississippi with and without year-round supplemental feeding (average distance between pairs = 147 m). During May-August in 2019 and 2020, feces from white-tailed deer and raccoons were collected and examined for the presence of nematodes, coccidia, Giardia spp., Cryptosporidium spp., and Baylisascaris procyonis. On average, fed sites had 8 more deer (241% increase) and 2 more raccoon fecal piles (540% increase) than unfed sites. Average parasite loads for individual fecal samples did not differ between fed and unfed sites, but the greater number of deer and raccoon fecal piles at fed sites (p < 0.0001) produced 231% and 308% greater environmental loads of nematodes and coccidia, respectively. Spin feeders, the only feeder type that distributed feed on the ground, had 326% more coccidia in feces on average compared to other feeder types (p < 0.03). These results show that supplemental feeding of white-tailed deer, especially with spin feeders, increases environmental loads of GIP and the potential for transmission of parasitic diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9550164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95501642022-10-11 Analysis of supplemental wildlife feeding in Mississippi and environmental gastrointestinal parasite load Huang, Miranda H. J. Demarais, Steve Brookshire, W. Cooper Strickland, Bronson K. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Wildlife species are host to a variety of gastrointestinal parasites (GIPs). Artificially concentrating animals may increase the risk of disease spread due to increased GIP load and associated environmental load. Supplemental feeding of deer is common among hunters and known to concentrate animals, but there is limited knowledge of how it affects GIP environmental load. GIP load was compared between ecologically-equivalent pairs of sites in Mississippi with and without year-round supplemental feeding (average distance between pairs = 147 m). During May-August in 2019 and 2020, feces from white-tailed deer and raccoons were collected and examined for the presence of nematodes, coccidia, Giardia spp., Cryptosporidium spp., and Baylisascaris procyonis. On average, fed sites had 8 more deer (241% increase) and 2 more raccoon fecal piles (540% increase) than unfed sites. Average parasite loads for individual fecal samples did not differ between fed and unfed sites, but the greater number of deer and raccoon fecal piles at fed sites (p < 0.0001) produced 231% and 308% greater environmental loads of nematodes and coccidia, respectively. Spin feeders, the only feeder type that distributed feed on the ground, had 326% more coccidia in feces on average compared to other feeder types (p < 0.03). These results show that supplemental feeding of white-tailed deer, especially with spin feeders, increases environmental loads of GIP and the potential for transmission of parasitic diseases. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9550164/ /pubmed/36225801 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.995437 Text en Copyright © 2022 Huang, Demarais, Brookshire and Strickland. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Huang, Miranda H. J.
Demarais, Steve
Brookshire, W. Cooper
Strickland, Bronson K.
Analysis of supplemental wildlife feeding in Mississippi and environmental gastrointestinal parasite load
title Analysis of supplemental wildlife feeding in Mississippi and environmental gastrointestinal parasite load
title_full Analysis of supplemental wildlife feeding in Mississippi and environmental gastrointestinal parasite load
title_fullStr Analysis of supplemental wildlife feeding in Mississippi and environmental gastrointestinal parasite load
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of supplemental wildlife feeding in Mississippi and environmental gastrointestinal parasite load
title_short Analysis of supplemental wildlife feeding in Mississippi and environmental gastrointestinal parasite load
title_sort analysis of supplemental wildlife feeding in mississippi and environmental gastrointestinal parasite load
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9550164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36225801
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.995437
work_keys_str_mv AT huangmirandahj analysisofsupplementalwildlifefeedinginmississippiandenvironmentalgastrointestinalparasiteload
AT demaraissteve analysisofsupplementalwildlifefeedinginmississippiandenvironmentalgastrointestinalparasiteload
AT brookshirewcooper analysisofsupplementalwildlifefeedinginmississippiandenvironmentalgastrointestinalparasiteload
AT stricklandbronsonk analysisofsupplementalwildlifefeedinginmississippiandenvironmentalgastrointestinalparasiteload