Cargando…

Safety and Efficacy of Embolization Using N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate via a Percutaneous Direct Approach for Endoleaks after Abdominal/Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

Purpose: To elucidate the safety and efficacy of embolization using N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) for endoleaks after abdominal/thoracic endovascular aortic repair (EVAR/TEVAR) via a direct percutaneous approach versus a transarterial approach. Materials and Methods: The retrospective design of the s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ushijima, Yasuhiro, Asayama, Yoshiki, Nishie, Akihiro, Ishigami, Kousei, Takayama, Yukihisa, Okamoto, Daisuke, Fujita, Nobuhiro, Morita, Koichiro, Honda, Hiroshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society of Interventional Radiology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9550392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36284832
http://dx.doi.org/10.22575/interventionalradiology.2018-0018
_version_ 1784805874210963456
author Ushijima, Yasuhiro
Asayama, Yoshiki
Nishie, Akihiro
Ishigami, Kousei
Takayama, Yukihisa
Okamoto, Daisuke
Fujita, Nobuhiro
Morita, Koichiro
Honda, Hiroshi
author_facet Ushijima, Yasuhiro
Asayama, Yoshiki
Nishie, Akihiro
Ishigami, Kousei
Takayama, Yukihisa
Okamoto, Daisuke
Fujita, Nobuhiro
Morita, Koichiro
Honda, Hiroshi
author_sort Ushijima, Yasuhiro
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To elucidate the safety and efficacy of embolization using N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) for endoleaks after abdominal/thoracic endovascular aortic repair (EVAR/TEVAR) via a direct percutaneous approach versus a transarterial approach. Materials and Methods: The retrospective design of the study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and the requirement for informed written consent was waived. Sixteen patients underwent embolization for endoleaks after EVAR/TEVAR, which was diagnosed as type II, from March 2010 to December 2013 at our institution. The number of embolization sessions was 21. A direct percutaneous approach was used in 10 sessions, and a transarterial approach was used in 11 sessions. There were 11 and 15 embolic sites for the two approaches, respectively. The procedure time, amount of contrast media used, therapeutic effect, and complications were evaluated. Results: The mean procedure time (per embolic site) was 100 min (53-170) in the direct percutaneous approach, which was significantly shorter than the 191 min (76-275) in the transarterial approach. The mean amount of contrast media used during the procedure (per embolic site) was 12.8 ml (3-25) by the direct percutaneous approach, which was significantly lesser than the 71.8 ml (30-180) in the transarterial approach. Local control of the embolic site and interval increase in the size of aneurysm after embolization were not significantly different between the two approaches. In one case each, mesenteric hematoma and migration of the embolic agent occurred with a direct percutaneous approach, and a small arterial injury occurred with the transarterial approach; aneurysmal rupture/perianeurysmal hematoma and neurological dysfunction were not observed. Conclusion: A direct percutaneous approach is a feasible procedure for embolization of endoleaks after EVAR/TEVAR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9550392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Japanese Society of Interventional Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95503922022-10-24 Safety and Efficacy of Embolization Using N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate via a Percutaneous Direct Approach for Endoleaks after Abdominal/Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Ushijima, Yasuhiro Asayama, Yoshiki Nishie, Akihiro Ishigami, Kousei Takayama, Yukihisa Okamoto, Daisuke Fujita, Nobuhiro Morita, Koichiro Honda, Hiroshi Interv Radiol (Higashimatsuyama) Original Research Purpose: To elucidate the safety and efficacy of embolization using N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) for endoleaks after abdominal/thoracic endovascular aortic repair (EVAR/TEVAR) via a direct percutaneous approach versus a transarterial approach. Materials and Methods: The retrospective design of the study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and the requirement for informed written consent was waived. Sixteen patients underwent embolization for endoleaks after EVAR/TEVAR, which was diagnosed as type II, from March 2010 to December 2013 at our institution. The number of embolization sessions was 21. A direct percutaneous approach was used in 10 sessions, and a transarterial approach was used in 11 sessions. There were 11 and 15 embolic sites for the two approaches, respectively. The procedure time, amount of contrast media used, therapeutic effect, and complications were evaluated. Results: The mean procedure time (per embolic site) was 100 min (53-170) in the direct percutaneous approach, which was significantly shorter than the 191 min (76-275) in the transarterial approach. The mean amount of contrast media used during the procedure (per embolic site) was 12.8 ml (3-25) by the direct percutaneous approach, which was significantly lesser than the 71.8 ml (30-180) in the transarterial approach. Local control of the embolic site and interval increase in the size of aneurysm after embolization were not significantly different between the two approaches. In one case each, mesenteric hematoma and migration of the embolic agent occurred with a direct percutaneous approach, and a small arterial injury occurred with the transarterial approach; aneurysmal rupture/perianeurysmal hematoma and neurological dysfunction were not observed. Conclusion: A direct percutaneous approach is a feasible procedure for embolization of endoleaks after EVAR/TEVAR. The Japanese Society of Interventional Radiology 2019-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9550392/ /pubmed/36284832 http://dx.doi.org/10.22575/interventionalradiology.2018-0018 Text en © 2020 Japanese Society of Interventional Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Interventional Radiology is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Ushijima, Yasuhiro
Asayama, Yoshiki
Nishie, Akihiro
Ishigami, Kousei
Takayama, Yukihisa
Okamoto, Daisuke
Fujita, Nobuhiro
Morita, Koichiro
Honda, Hiroshi
Safety and Efficacy of Embolization Using N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate via a Percutaneous Direct Approach for Endoleaks after Abdominal/Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair
title Safety and Efficacy of Embolization Using N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate via a Percutaneous Direct Approach for Endoleaks after Abdominal/Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair
title_full Safety and Efficacy of Embolization Using N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate via a Percutaneous Direct Approach for Endoleaks after Abdominal/Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair
title_fullStr Safety and Efficacy of Embolization Using N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate via a Percutaneous Direct Approach for Endoleaks after Abdominal/Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Efficacy of Embolization Using N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate via a Percutaneous Direct Approach for Endoleaks after Abdominal/Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair
title_short Safety and Efficacy of Embolization Using N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate via a Percutaneous Direct Approach for Endoleaks after Abdominal/Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair
title_sort safety and efficacy of embolization using n-butyl cyanoacrylate via a percutaneous direct approach for endoleaks after abdominal/thoracic endovascular aortic repair
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9550392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36284832
http://dx.doi.org/10.22575/interventionalradiology.2018-0018
work_keys_str_mv AT ushijimayasuhiro safetyandefficacyofembolizationusingnbutylcyanoacrylateviaapercutaneousdirectapproachforendoleaksafterabdominalthoracicendovascularaorticrepair
AT asayamayoshiki safetyandefficacyofembolizationusingnbutylcyanoacrylateviaapercutaneousdirectapproachforendoleaksafterabdominalthoracicendovascularaorticrepair
AT nishieakihiro safetyandefficacyofembolizationusingnbutylcyanoacrylateviaapercutaneousdirectapproachforendoleaksafterabdominalthoracicendovascularaorticrepair
AT ishigamikousei safetyandefficacyofembolizationusingnbutylcyanoacrylateviaapercutaneousdirectapproachforendoleaksafterabdominalthoracicendovascularaorticrepair
AT takayamayukihisa safetyandefficacyofembolizationusingnbutylcyanoacrylateviaapercutaneousdirectapproachforendoleaksafterabdominalthoracicendovascularaorticrepair
AT okamotodaisuke safetyandefficacyofembolizationusingnbutylcyanoacrylateviaapercutaneousdirectapproachforendoleaksafterabdominalthoracicendovascularaorticrepair
AT fujitanobuhiro safetyandefficacyofembolizationusingnbutylcyanoacrylateviaapercutaneousdirectapproachforendoleaksafterabdominalthoracicendovascularaorticrepair
AT moritakoichiro safetyandefficacyofembolizationusingnbutylcyanoacrylateviaapercutaneousdirectapproachforendoleaksafterabdominalthoracicendovascularaorticrepair
AT hondahiroshi safetyandefficacyofembolizationusingnbutylcyanoacrylateviaapercutaneousdirectapproachforendoleaksafterabdominalthoracicendovascularaorticrepair