Cargando…

Recent Update of Endovascular Type 2 Endoleak Management

EVAR has been used clinically for almost three decades, and it has been widely applied in clinical practice and has been applied to difficult cases as devices and techniques have evolved. Although the major advantage of EVAR is its lower perioperative mortality, compared with open surgery, late-onse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Katada, Yoshiaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society of Interventional Radiology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9550397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36284754
http://dx.doi.org/10.22575/interventionalradiology.2020-0016
_version_ 1784805875402145792
author Katada, Yoshiaki
author_facet Katada, Yoshiaki
author_sort Katada, Yoshiaki
collection PubMed
description EVAR has been used clinically for almost three decades, and it has been widely applied in clinical practice and has been applied to difficult cases as devices and techniques have evolved. Although the major advantage of EVAR is its lower perioperative mortality, compared with open surgery, late-onset complications such as endoleaks have become major issues, requiring lifelong follow-up after EVAR. The clinical guidelines have been updated, and many systematic reviews/meta-analyses and multi-center registries have been published; surgeons must keep up-to-date regarding these changes. In this review, the author reviews evidence on the recent update of the type 2 endoleak management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9550397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Japanese Society of Interventional Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95503972022-10-24 Recent Update of Endovascular Type 2 Endoleak Management Katada, Yoshiaki Interv Radiol (Higashimatsuyama) Review EVAR has been used clinically for almost three decades, and it has been widely applied in clinical practice and has been applied to difficult cases as devices and techniques have evolved. Although the major advantage of EVAR is its lower perioperative mortality, compared with open surgery, late-onset complications such as endoleaks have become major issues, requiring lifelong follow-up after EVAR. The clinical guidelines have been updated, and many systematic reviews/meta-analyses and multi-center registries have been published; surgeons must keep up-to-date regarding these changes. In this review, the author reviews evidence on the recent update of the type 2 endoleak management. The Japanese Society of Interventional Radiology 2020-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9550397/ /pubmed/36284754 http://dx.doi.org/10.22575/interventionalradiology.2020-0016 Text en © 2020 Japanese Society of Interventional Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Interventional Radiology is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Katada, Yoshiaki
Recent Update of Endovascular Type 2 Endoleak Management
title Recent Update of Endovascular Type 2 Endoleak Management
title_full Recent Update of Endovascular Type 2 Endoleak Management
title_fullStr Recent Update of Endovascular Type 2 Endoleak Management
title_full_unstemmed Recent Update of Endovascular Type 2 Endoleak Management
title_short Recent Update of Endovascular Type 2 Endoleak Management
title_sort recent update of endovascular type 2 endoleak management
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9550397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36284754
http://dx.doi.org/10.22575/interventionalradiology.2020-0016
work_keys_str_mv AT katadayoshiaki recentupdateofendovasculartype2endoleakmanagement