Cargando…
The 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Clinically High-Risk Lobular and Ductal Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Study
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) are more likely to have discordant clinical and genomic risk than those with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) when using the 21-gene recurrence score (RS), and to assess overall survival outcomes o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9550696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35810223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12065-3 |
_version_ | 1784805937713774592 |
---|---|
author | Abel, Mary Kathryn Shui, Amy M. Chien, A. Jo Rugo, Hope S. Melisko, Michelle Baehner, Frederick Mukhtar, Rita A. |
author_facet | Abel, Mary Kathryn Shui, Amy M. Chien, A. Jo Rugo, Hope S. Melisko, Michelle Baehner, Frederick Mukhtar, Rita A. |
author_sort | Abel, Mary Kathryn |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) are more likely to have discordant clinical and genomic risk than those with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) when using the 21-gene recurrence score (RS), and to assess overall survival outcomes of patients with 1–3 positive nodes and RS ≤25 with and without chemotherapy, stratified by histology. METHODS: We performed a cohort study using the National Cancer Database and included patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, stage I–III invasive breast cancer who underwent 21-gene RS testing. Our primary outcome was rate of discordant clinical and genomic risk status by histologic subtype. Propensity score matching was used to compare 60-month overall survival in individuals with 1–3 positive nodes and RS ≤25 who did and did not receive chemotherapy. RESULTS: Overall, 186,867 patients were included in our analysis, including 37,685 (20.2%) patients with ILC. There was a significantly higher rate of discordant clinical and genomic risk in patients with ILC compared with IDC. Among patients with 1–3 positive nodes and RS ≤25, there was no significant difference in survival between those who did and did not receive chemotherapy in the IDC or ILC cohorts. Unadjusted exploratory analyses of patients under age 50 years with 1–3 positive nodes and RS ≤25 showed improved overall survival in IDC patients who received chemotherapy, but not among those with ILC. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the importance of lobular-specific tools for stratifying clinical and genomic risk, as well as the need for histologic subtype-specific analyses in randomized trials. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-022-12065-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9550696 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95506962022-10-12 The 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Clinically High-Risk Lobular and Ductal Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Study Abel, Mary Kathryn Shui, Amy M. Chien, A. Jo Rugo, Hope S. Melisko, Michelle Baehner, Frederick Mukhtar, Rita A. Ann Surg Oncol Breast Oncology OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) are more likely to have discordant clinical and genomic risk than those with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) when using the 21-gene recurrence score (RS), and to assess overall survival outcomes of patients with 1–3 positive nodes and RS ≤25 with and without chemotherapy, stratified by histology. METHODS: We performed a cohort study using the National Cancer Database and included patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, stage I–III invasive breast cancer who underwent 21-gene RS testing. Our primary outcome was rate of discordant clinical and genomic risk status by histologic subtype. Propensity score matching was used to compare 60-month overall survival in individuals with 1–3 positive nodes and RS ≤25 who did and did not receive chemotherapy. RESULTS: Overall, 186,867 patients were included in our analysis, including 37,685 (20.2%) patients with ILC. There was a significantly higher rate of discordant clinical and genomic risk in patients with ILC compared with IDC. Among patients with 1–3 positive nodes and RS ≤25, there was no significant difference in survival between those who did and did not receive chemotherapy in the IDC or ILC cohorts. Unadjusted exploratory analyses of patients under age 50 years with 1–3 positive nodes and RS ≤25 showed improved overall survival in IDC patients who received chemotherapy, but not among those with ILC. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the importance of lobular-specific tools for stratifying clinical and genomic risk, as well as the need for histologic subtype-specific analyses in randomized trials. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-022-12065-3. Springer International Publishing 2022-07-09 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9550696/ /pubmed/35810223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12065-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Breast Oncology Abel, Mary Kathryn Shui, Amy M. Chien, A. Jo Rugo, Hope S. Melisko, Michelle Baehner, Frederick Mukhtar, Rita A. The 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Clinically High-Risk Lobular and Ductal Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Study |
title | The 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Clinically High-Risk Lobular and Ductal Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Study |
title_full | The 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Clinically High-Risk Lobular and Ductal Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Study |
title_fullStr | The 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Clinically High-Risk Lobular and Ductal Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Clinically High-Risk Lobular and Ductal Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Study |
title_short | The 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Clinically High-Risk Lobular and Ductal Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Study |
title_sort | 21-gene recurrence score in clinically high-risk lobular and ductal breast cancer: a national cancer database study |
topic | Breast Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9550696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35810223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12065-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abelmarykathryn the21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy AT shuiamym the21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy AT chienajo the21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy AT rugohopes the21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy AT meliskomichelle the21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy AT baehnerfrederick the21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy AT mukhtarritaa the21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy AT abelmarykathryn 21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy AT shuiamym 21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy AT chienajo 21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy AT rugohopes 21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy AT meliskomichelle 21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy AT baehnerfrederick 21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy AT mukhtarritaa 21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy |