Cargando…

The 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Clinically High-Risk Lobular and Ductal Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) are more likely to have discordant clinical and genomic risk than those with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) when using the 21-gene recurrence score (RS), and to assess overall survival outcomes o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abel, Mary Kathryn, Shui, Amy M., Chien, A. Jo, Rugo, Hope S., Melisko, Michelle, Baehner, Frederick, Mukhtar, Rita A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9550696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35810223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12065-3
_version_ 1784805937713774592
author Abel, Mary Kathryn
Shui, Amy M.
Chien, A. Jo
Rugo, Hope S.
Melisko, Michelle
Baehner, Frederick
Mukhtar, Rita A.
author_facet Abel, Mary Kathryn
Shui, Amy M.
Chien, A. Jo
Rugo, Hope S.
Melisko, Michelle
Baehner, Frederick
Mukhtar, Rita A.
author_sort Abel, Mary Kathryn
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) are more likely to have discordant clinical and genomic risk than those with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) when using the 21-gene recurrence score (RS), and to assess overall survival outcomes of patients with 1–3 positive nodes and RS ≤25 with and without chemotherapy, stratified by histology. METHODS: We performed a cohort study using the National Cancer Database and included patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, stage I–III invasive breast cancer who underwent 21-gene RS testing. Our primary outcome was rate of discordant clinical and genomic risk status by histologic subtype. Propensity score matching was used to compare 60-month overall survival in individuals with 1–3 positive nodes and RS ≤25 who did and did not receive chemotherapy. RESULTS: Overall, 186,867 patients were included in our analysis, including 37,685 (20.2%) patients with ILC. There was a significantly higher rate of discordant clinical and genomic risk in patients with ILC compared with IDC. Among patients with 1–3 positive nodes and RS ≤25, there was no significant difference in survival between those who did and did not receive chemotherapy in the IDC or ILC cohorts. Unadjusted exploratory analyses of patients under age 50 years with 1–3 positive nodes and RS ≤25 showed improved overall survival in IDC patients who received chemotherapy, but not among those with ILC. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the importance of lobular-specific tools for stratifying clinical and genomic risk, as well as the need for histologic subtype-specific analyses in randomized trials. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-022-12065-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9550696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95506962022-10-12 The 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Clinically High-Risk Lobular and Ductal Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Study Abel, Mary Kathryn Shui, Amy M. Chien, A. Jo Rugo, Hope S. Melisko, Michelle Baehner, Frederick Mukhtar, Rita A. Ann Surg Oncol Breast Oncology OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) are more likely to have discordant clinical and genomic risk than those with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) when using the 21-gene recurrence score (RS), and to assess overall survival outcomes of patients with 1–3 positive nodes and RS ≤25 with and without chemotherapy, stratified by histology. METHODS: We performed a cohort study using the National Cancer Database and included patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, stage I–III invasive breast cancer who underwent 21-gene RS testing. Our primary outcome was rate of discordant clinical and genomic risk status by histologic subtype. Propensity score matching was used to compare 60-month overall survival in individuals with 1–3 positive nodes and RS ≤25 who did and did not receive chemotherapy. RESULTS: Overall, 186,867 patients were included in our analysis, including 37,685 (20.2%) patients with ILC. There was a significantly higher rate of discordant clinical and genomic risk in patients with ILC compared with IDC. Among patients with 1–3 positive nodes and RS ≤25, there was no significant difference in survival between those who did and did not receive chemotherapy in the IDC or ILC cohorts. Unadjusted exploratory analyses of patients under age 50 years with 1–3 positive nodes and RS ≤25 showed improved overall survival in IDC patients who received chemotherapy, but not among those with ILC. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the importance of lobular-specific tools for stratifying clinical and genomic risk, as well as the need for histologic subtype-specific analyses in randomized trials. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-022-12065-3. Springer International Publishing 2022-07-09 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9550696/ /pubmed/35810223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12065-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Breast Oncology
Abel, Mary Kathryn
Shui, Amy M.
Chien, A. Jo
Rugo, Hope S.
Melisko, Michelle
Baehner, Frederick
Mukhtar, Rita A.
The 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Clinically High-Risk Lobular and Ductal Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Study
title The 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Clinically High-Risk Lobular and Ductal Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Study
title_full The 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Clinically High-Risk Lobular and Ductal Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Study
title_fullStr The 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Clinically High-Risk Lobular and Ductal Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Study
title_full_unstemmed The 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Clinically High-Risk Lobular and Ductal Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Study
title_short The 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Clinically High-Risk Lobular and Ductal Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Study
title_sort 21-gene recurrence score in clinically high-risk lobular and ductal breast cancer: a national cancer database study
topic Breast Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9550696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35810223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12065-3
work_keys_str_mv AT abelmarykathryn the21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy
AT shuiamym the21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy
AT chienajo the21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy
AT rugohopes the21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy
AT meliskomichelle the21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy
AT baehnerfrederick the21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy
AT mukhtarritaa the21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy
AT abelmarykathryn 21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy
AT shuiamym 21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy
AT chienajo 21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy
AT rugohopes 21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy
AT meliskomichelle 21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy
AT baehnerfrederick 21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy
AT mukhtarritaa 21generecurrencescoreinclinicallyhighrisklobularandductalbreastcanceranationalcancerdatabasestudy