Cargando…

Robotic-Assisted Esophagectomy Leads to Significant Reduction in Postoperative Acute Pain: A Retrospective Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) shows promising results regarding postoperative complications in patients with esophageal cancer. To date, no data are available regarding postoperative analgesic consumption. The aim of this work is to evaluate analgesic consumptio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoelzen, Jens P., Sander, Karl J., Sesia, Matteo, Roy, Dhruvajyoti, Rijcken, Emile, Schnabel, Alexander, Struecker, Benjamin, Juratli, Mazen A., Pascher, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9550779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35854033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12200-0
_version_ 1784805957547589632
author Hoelzen, Jens P.
Sander, Karl J.
Sesia, Matteo
Roy, Dhruvajyoti
Rijcken, Emile
Schnabel, Alexander
Struecker, Benjamin
Juratli, Mazen A.
Pascher, Andreas
author_facet Hoelzen, Jens P.
Sander, Karl J.
Sesia, Matteo
Roy, Dhruvajyoti
Rijcken, Emile
Schnabel, Alexander
Struecker, Benjamin
Juratli, Mazen A.
Pascher, Andreas
author_sort Hoelzen, Jens P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) shows promising results regarding postoperative complications in patients with esophageal cancer. To date, no data are available regarding postoperative analgesic consumption. The aim of this work is to evaluate analgesic consumption after esophagectomy. METHODS: A total of 274 Ivor Lewis esophageal resections performed sequentially from January 2012 to December 2020 were evaluated. RAMIE cases (n = 51) were compared with the hybrid technique (laparoscopic abdominal phase followed by open thoracotomy, n = 59) and open abdominothoracic esophagectomy (OTE) (n = 164). Data were collected retrospectively. The primary endpoint was the overall postoperative morphine consumption, which represents a reliable indirect measurement of pain. Pain levels recorded on the first, third, and fifth postoperative days were assessed as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: A total of 274 patients were included. The postoperative opioid consumption rate for patients who underwent RAMIE (quartiles: 0.14, 0.23, 0.36 mg morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/kg body weight (bw)/day) was significantly lower than in the open group (0.19, 0.33, 0.58 mg MME/kg bw/day, p = 0.016). The overall postoperative opioid consumption for patients who underwent RAMIE was significantly lower (2.45, 3.63, 7.20 mg MME/kg bw/day; morphine milligram equivalents per kilogram body weight) compared with the open (4.85, 8.59, 14.63 MME/kg bw/day, p < 0.0001) and hybrid (4.13, 6.84, 11.36 MME/kg bw/day, p = 0.008) groups. Patients who underwent RAMIE reported lower pain scores compared with the open group on the fifth postoperative day, both at rest (p = 0.004) and while performing activities (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that patients who underwent RAMIE experienced similar postoperative pain while requiring significantly lower amounts of opioids compared with patients who underwent open and hybrid surgery. Further studies are required to verify the results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9550779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95507792022-10-12 Robotic-Assisted Esophagectomy Leads to Significant Reduction in Postoperative Acute Pain: A Retrospective Clinical Trial Hoelzen, Jens P. Sander, Karl J. Sesia, Matteo Roy, Dhruvajyoti Rijcken, Emile Schnabel, Alexander Struecker, Benjamin Juratli, Mazen A. Pascher, Andreas Ann Surg Oncol Thoracic Oncology BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) shows promising results regarding postoperative complications in patients with esophageal cancer. To date, no data are available regarding postoperative analgesic consumption. The aim of this work is to evaluate analgesic consumption after esophagectomy. METHODS: A total of 274 Ivor Lewis esophageal resections performed sequentially from January 2012 to December 2020 were evaluated. RAMIE cases (n = 51) were compared with the hybrid technique (laparoscopic abdominal phase followed by open thoracotomy, n = 59) and open abdominothoracic esophagectomy (OTE) (n = 164). Data were collected retrospectively. The primary endpoint was the overall postoperative morphine consumption, which represents a reliable indirect measurement of pain. Pain levels recorded on the first, third, and fifth postoperative days were assessed as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: A total of 274 patients were included. The postoperative opioid consumption rate for patients who underwent RAMIE (quartiles: 0.14, 0.23, 0.36 mg morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/kg body weight (bw)/day) was significantly lower than in the open group (0.19, 0.33, 0.58 mg MME/kg bw/day, p = 0.016). The overall postoperative opioid consumption for patients who underwent RAMIE was significantly lower (2.45, 3.63, 7.20 mg MME/kg bw/day; morphine milligram equivalents per kilogram body weight) compared with the open (4.85, 8.59, 14.63 MME/kg bw/day, p < 0.0001) and hybrid (4.13, 6.84, 11.36 MME/kg bw/day, p = 0.008) groups. Patients who underwent RAMIE reported lower pain scores compared with the open group on the fifth postoperative day, both at rest (p = 0.004) and while performing activities (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that patients who underwent RAMIE experienced similar postoperative pain while requiring significantly lower amounts of opioids compared with patients who underwent open and hybrid surgery. Further studies are required to verify the results. Springer International Publishing 2022-07-19 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9550779/ /pubmed/35854033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12200-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Thoracic Oncology
Hoelzen, Jens P.
Sander, Karl J.
Sesia, Matteo
Roy, Dhruvajyoti
Rijcken, Emile
Schnabel, Alexander
Struecker, Benjamin
Juratli, Mazen A.
Pascher, Andreas
Robotic-Assisted Esophagectomy Leads to Significant Reduction in Postoperative Acute Pain: A Retrospective Clinical Trial
title Robotic-Assisted Esophagectomy Leads to Significant Reduction in Postoperative Acute Pain: A Retrospective Clinical Trial
title_full Robotic-Assisted Esophagectomy Leads to Significant Reduction in Postoperative Acute Pain: A Retrospective Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Robotic-Assisted Esophagectomy Leads to Significant Reduction in Postoperative Acute Pain: A Retrospective Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Robotic-Assisted Esophagectomy Leads to Significant Reduction in Postoperative Acute Pain: A Retrospective Clinical Trial
title_short Robotic-Assisted Esophagectomy Leads to Significant Reduction in Postoperative Acute Pain: A Retrospective Clinical Trial
title_sort robotic-assisted esophagectomy leads to significant reduction in postoperative acute pain: a retrospective clinical trial
topic Thoracic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9550779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35854033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12200-0
work_keys_str_mv AT hoelzenjensp roboticassistedesophagectomyleadstosignificantreductioninpostoperativeacutepainaretrospectiveclinicaltrial
AT sanderkarlj roboticassistedesophagectomyleadstosignificantreductioninpostoperativeacutepainaretrospectiveclinicaltrial
AT sesiamatteo roboticassistedesophagectomyleadstosignificantreductioninpostoperativeacutepainaretrospectiveclinicaltrial
AT roydhruvajyoti roboticassistedesophagectomyleadstosignificantreductioninpostoperativeacutepainaretrospectiveclinicaltrial
AT rijckenemile roboticassistedesophagectomyleadstosignificantreductioninpostoperativeacutepainaretrospectiveclinicaltrial
AT schnabelalexander roboticassistedesophagectomyleadstosignificantreductioninpostoperativeacutepainaretrospectiveclinicaltrial
AT strueckerbenjamin roboticassistedesophagectomyleadstosignificantreductioninpostoperativeacutepainaretrospectiveclinicaltrial
AT juratlimazena roboticassistedesophagectomyleadstosignificantreductioninpostoperativeacutepainaretrospectiveclinicaltrial
AT pascherandreas roboticassistedesophagectomyleadstosignificantreductioninpostoperativeacutepainaretrospectiveclinicaltrial