Cargando…
A prediction model for treatment decisions in distal radial physeal injuries: A multicenter retrospective study
BACKGROUND: There are no clearly defined guidelines for the management of distal radial physeal injuries. We aimed to identify the risk factors for patients with distal radial physeal trauma for the risk of deformity, physeal closure, and revision procedure and develop a predictive model. METHODS: T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9551004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36238139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/18632521221126926 |
_version_ | 1784806001469292544 |
---|---|
author | Kannan, Sudhir Chong, Han Hong Fadulelmola, Ahmed Emmerson, Benjamin McConaghie, Gregory Lennox-Warburton, Hannah Eardley, William Venkatachalam, Santosh Abraham, Alwyn Henman, Philip |
author_facet | Kannan, Sudhir Chong, Han Hong Fadulelmola, Ahmed Emmerson, Benjamin McConaghie, Gregory Lennox-Warburton, Hannah Eardley, William Venkatachalam, Santosh Abraham, Alwyn Henman, Philip |
author_sort | Kannan, Sudhir |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There are no clearly defined guidelines for the management of distal radial physeal injuries. We aimed to identify the risk factors for patients with distal radial physeal trauma for the risk of deformity, physeal closure, and revision procedure and develop a predictive model. METHODS: The retrospective study included patients less than 16 years old with displaced distal radial physeal injuries treated between 2011 and 2018 across five centers in the United Kingdom. Deformity was defined as a volar angulation of >11°, dorsal angulation of >15°, a radial inclination of <15° or >23°, or positive ulnar variance. Presence of a bony bar spanning the physis was considered physeal closure. RESULTS: This study comprised of 479 patients. In that, 32 (6.6%) patients had a second procedure. Also, 49 (10.2%) patients had closure of physis, and 28 (6%) patients had deformity at the end of follow-up. The occurrence of deformity had a strong correlation with age (p = 0.04) and immobilization duration (p = 0.003). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that age >12.5 years (p = 0.006) and sagittal angulation of >21.7° (p = 0.002) had a higher odd of deformity. Immobilization for <4.5 weeks (p = 0.01) had a higher revision rate. The nomograms showed good calibration, with a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 75%. INTERPRETATION: The nomograms provide accurate, pragmatic multivariate predictive models. Anatomical reduction is recommended in patients >12.5 years of age with >22° of dorsal angulation with cast immobilization for no less than 4.5 weeks. Any revision procedure should be performed within 11 days from the date of injury to reduce the risk of physeal damage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9551004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95510042022-10-12 A prediction model for treatment decisions in distal radial physeal injuries: A multicenter retrospective study Kannan, Sudhir Chong, Han Hong Fadulelmola, Ahmed Emmerson, Benjamin McConaghie, Gregory Lennox-Warburton, Hannah Eardley, William Venkatachalam, Santosh Abraham, Alwyn Henman, Philip J Child Orthop Trauma BACKGROUND: There are no clearly defined guidelines for the management of distal radial physeal injuries. We aimed to identify the risk factors for patients with distal radial physeal trauma for the risk of deformity, physeal closure, and revision procedure and develop a predictive model. METHODS: The retrospective study included patients less than 16 years old with displaced distal radial physeal injuries treated between 2011 and 2018 across five centers in the United Kingdom. Deformity was defined as a volar angulation of >11°, dorsal angulation of >15°, a radial inclination of <15° or >23°, or positive ulnar variance. Presence of a bony bar spanning the physis was considered physeal closure. RESULTS: This study comprised of 479 patients. In that, 32 (6.6%) patients had a second procedure. Also, 49 (10.2%) patients had closure of physis, and 28 (6%) patients had deformity at the end of follow-up. The occurrence of deformity had a strong correlation with age (p = 0.04) and immobilization duration (p = 0.003). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that age >12.5 years (p = 0.006) and sagittal angulation of >21.7° (p = 0.002) had a higher odd of deformity. Immobilization for <4.5 weeks (p = 0.01) had a higher revision rate. The nomograms showed good calibration, with a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 75%. INTERPRETATION: The nomograms provide accurate, pragmatic multivariate predictive models. Anatomical reduction is recommended in patients >12.5 years of age with >22° of dorsal angulation with cast immobilization for no less than 4.5 weeks. Any revision procedure should be performed within 11 days from the date of injury to reduce the risk of physeal damage. SAGE Publications 2022-10-03 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9551004/ /pubmed/36238139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/18632521221126926 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Trauma Kannan, Sudhir Chong, Han Hong Fadulelmola, Ahmed Emmerson, Benjamin McConaghie, Gregory Lennox-Warburton, Hannah Eardley, William Venkatachalam, Santosh Abraham, Alwyn Henman, Philip A prediction model for treatment decisions in distal radial physeal injuries: A multicenter retrospective study |
title | A prediction model for treatment decisions in distal radial physeal
injuries: A multicenter retrospective study |
title_full | A prediction model for treatment decisions in distal radial physeal
injuries: A multicenter retrospective study |
title_fullStr | A prediction model for treatment decisions in distal radial physeal
injuries: A multicenter retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | A prediction model for treatment decisions in distal radial physeal
injuries: A multicenter retrospective study |
title_short | A prediction model for treatment decisions in distal radial physeal
injuries: A multicenter retrospective study |
title_sort | prediction model for treatment decisions in distal radial physeal
injuries: a multicenter retrospective study |
topic | Trauma |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9551004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36238139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/18632521221126926 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kannansudhir apredictionmodelfortreatmentdecisionsindistalradialphysealinjuriesamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT chonghanhong apredictionmodelfortreatmentdecisionsindistalradialphysealinjuriesamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT fadulelmolaahmed apredictionmodelfortreatmentdecisionsindistalradialphysealinjuriesamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT emmersonbenjamin apredictionmodelfortreatmentdecisionsindistalradialphysealinjuriesamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT mcconaghiegregory apredictionmodelfortreatmentdecisionsindistalradialphysealinjuriesamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT lennoxwarburtonhannah apredictionmodelfortreatmentdecisionsindistalradialphysealinjuriesamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT eardleywilliam apredictionmodelfortreatmentdecisionsindistalradialphysealinjuriesamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT venkatachalamsantosh apredictionmodelfortreatmentdecisionsindistalradialphysealinjuriesamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT abrahamalwyn apredictionmodelfortreatmentdecisionsindistalradialphysealinjuriesamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT henmanphilip apredictionmodelfortreatmentdecisionsindistalradialphysealinjuriesamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT kannansudhir predictionmodelfortreatmentdecisionsindistalradialphysealinjuriesamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT chonghanhong predictionmodelfortreatmentdecisionsindistalradialphysealinjuriesamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT fadulelmolaahmed predictionmodelfortreatmentdecisionsindistalradialphysealinjuriesamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT emmersonbenjamin predictionmodelfortreatmentdecisionsindistalradialphysealinjuriesamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT mcconaghiegregory predictionmodelfortreatmentdecisionsindistalradialphysealinjuriesamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT lennoxwarburtonhannah predictionmodelfortreatmentdecisionsindistalradialphysealinjuriesamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT eardleywilliam predictionmodelfortreatmentdecisionsindistalradialphysealinjuriesamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT venkatachalamsantosh predictionmodelfortreatmentdecisionsindistalradialphysealinjuriesamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT abrahamalwyn predictionmodelfortreatmentdecisionsindistalradialphysealinjuriesamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT henmanphilip predictionmodelfortreatmentdecisionsindistalradialphysealinjuriesamulticenterretrospectivestudy |