Cargando…

Safety, efficacy, and selection strategy of laparoscopic local gastrectomy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the esophagogastric junction

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety, efficacy, and selection strategy of laparoscopic local gastrectomy for stromal tumors in the esophagogastric junction. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with mesenchymal tumors in the esophagogastric junction were retrospectively enrolled from April 2018 to July 20...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Haiqiao, Liu, Xiaoye, Zheng, Zhi, Yin, Jie, Zhang, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9551255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36238859
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1015126
_version_ 1784806056129462272
author Zhang, Haiqiao
Liu, Xiaoye
Zheng, Zhi
Yin, Jie
Zhang, Jun
author_facet Zhang, Haiqiao
Liu, Xiaoye
Zheng, Zhi
Yin, Jie
Zhang, Jun
author_sort Zhang, Haiqiao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety, efficacy, and selection strategy of laparoscopic local gastrectomy for stromal tumors in the esophagogastric junction. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with mesenchymal tumors in the esophagogastric junction were retrospectively enrolled from April 2018 to July 2021 in which the upper edge of the tumor is less than 2 cm from the Z-line or has invaded the Z-line <1/2 circumference. Surgical outcomes, complications, recover, and postoperative gastroesophageal reflux of both groups were compared. RESULTS: 27 patients underwent wedge resection, and 11 underwent resection by opening all of the layers of the stomach wall. Operative time (90.0 vs. 181.8 min, respectively, P = 0.001) was shorter for the WR group vs. RASW. Blood loss (20 vs. 50 ml, respectively, P = 0.012) was less for the WR group vs. RASW. Recovery of the RASW group was slower in terms of time to pass gas (2 vs. 3 days, P = 0.034), time to oral intake (2 vs. 4 days, P = 0.007), time to semi-liquid food intake (4 vs. 8 days, P = 0.003), and postoperative hospitalization (5 vs. 8 days, P = 0.001) vs. WR. In terms of short-term complications (≤30 days), no significant between-group differences were observed. Cardia stenosis did not occur in either group. In the WR group, one patient experienced mild reflux at 6 months and recovered 1 year after surgery. In the RASW group, one patient experienced severe gastroesophageal reflux at 6 months and 1 year after surgery, which was not entirely relieved by taking antacids. No other patients have gastroesophageal reflux. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic local gastrectomy is safe and feasible for mesenchymal tumors in the esophagogastric junction in which the upper edge of the tumor is less than 2 cm from the Z-line or has invaded the Z-line <1/2 circumference, and has achieved an excellent short-term effect. The choice of surgery is based on the relationship between the tumor and the position of the cardia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9551255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95512552022-10-12 Safety, efficacy, and selection strategy of laparoscopic local gastrectomy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the esophagogastric junction Zhang, Haiqiao Liu, Xiaoye Zheng, Zhi Yin, Jie Zhang, Jun Front Surg Surgery OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety, efficacy, and selection strategy of laparoscopic local gastrectomy for stromal tumors in the esophagogastric junction. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with mesenchymal tumors in the esophagogastric junction were retrospectively enrolled from April 2018 to July 2021 in which the upper edge of the tumor is less than 2 cm from the Z-line or has invaded the Z-line <1/2 circumference. Surgical outcomes, complications, recover, and postoperative gastroesophageal reflux of both groups were compared. RESULTS: 27 patients underwent wedge resection, and 11 underwent resection by opening all of the layers of the stomach wall. Operative time (90.0 vs. 181.8 min, respectively, P = 0.001) was shorter for the WR group vs. RASW. Blood loss (20 vs. 50 ml, respectively, P = 0.012) was less for the WR group vs. RASW. Recovery of the RASW group was slower in terms of time to pass gas (2 vs. 3 days, P = 0.034), time to oral intake (2 vs. 4 days, P = 0.007), time to semi-liquid food intake (4 vs. 8 days, P = 0.003), and postoperative hospitalization (5 vs. 8 days, P = 0.001) vs. WR. In terms of short-term complications (≤30 days), no significant between-group differences were observed. Cardia stenosis did not occur in either group. In the WR group, one patient experienced mild reflux at 6 months and recovered 1 year after surgery. In the RASW group, one patient experienced severe gastroesophageal reflux at 6 months and 1 year after surgery, which was not entirely relieved by taking antacids. No other patients have gastroesophageal reflux. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic local gastrectomy is safe and feasible for mesenchymal tumors in the esophagogastric junction in which the upper edge of the tumor is less than 2 cm from the Z-line or has invaded the Z-line <1/2 circumference, and has achieved an excellent short-term effect. The choice of surgery is based on the relationship between the tumor and the position of the cardia. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9551255/ /pubmed/36238859 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1015126 Text en © 2022 Zhang, Liu, Zheng, Yin and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Zhang, Haiqiao
Liu, Xiaoye
Zheng, Zhi
Yin, Jie
Zhang, Jun
Safety, efficacy, and selection strategy of laparoscopic local gastrectomy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the esophagogastric junction
title Safety, efficacy, and selection strategy of laparoscopic local gastrectomy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the esophagogastric junction
title_full Safety, efficacy, and selection strategy of laparoscopic local gastrectomy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the esophagogastric junction
title_fullStr Safety, efficacy, and selection strategy of laparoscopic local gastrectomy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the esophagogastric junction
title_full_unstemmed Safety, efficacy, and selection strategy of laparoscopic local gastrectomy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the esophagogastric junction
title_short Safety, efficacy, and selection strategy of laparoscopic local gastrectomy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the esophagogastric junction
title_sort safety, efficacy, and selection strategy of laparoscopic local gastrectomy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the esophagogastric junction
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9551255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36238859
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1015126
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanghaiqiao safetyefficacyandselectionstrategyoflaparoscopiclocalgastrectomyforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsintheesophagogastricjunction
AT liuxiaoye safetyefficacyandselectionstrategyoflaparoscopiclocalgastrectomyforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsintheesophagogastricjunction
AT zhengzhi safetyefficacyandselectionstrategyoflaparoscopiclocalgastrectomyforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsintheesophagogastricjunction
AT yinjie safetyefficacyandselectionstrategyoflaparoscopiclocalgastrectomyforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsintheesophagogastricjunction
AT zhangjun safetyefficacyandselectionstrategyoflaparoscopiclocalgastrectomyforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsintheesophagogastricjunction